Validation of a simplified oral indicator for home care nurses to refer older people to dental care professionals.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Acta Odontologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.2340/aos.v83.42487
Lina F Weening-Verbree, Annemarie A Schuller, Wim P Krijnen, Cees P Van der Schans, Sytse U Zuidema, Johannes S M Hobbelen
{"title":"Validation of a simplified oral indicator for home care nurses to refer older people to dental care professionals.","authors":"Lina F Weening-Verbree, Annemarie A Schuller, Wim P Krijnen, Cees P Van der Schans, Sytse U Zuidema, Johannes S M Hobbelen","doi":"10.2340/aos.v83.42487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to explore the identification of older people in need of dental consultation, with a Simplified Oral Indicator (SOI) used by home care nurses (HCNs) and with the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI-NL) completed by older people themselves, compared with the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT-NL), performed by dental hygienists.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The HCNs completed SOI based on their professional view, knowledge and experience; scores red/orange/green were given to older people for oral health and oral hygiene. Older people completed the GOHAI-NL and dental hygienists completed the OHAT-NL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 141 older people were analysed. Sensitivity and specificity of SOI -OHAT-NL were low (0.45 and 0.64, respectively); SOI scored only few older people as 'red', while only 11 older people did not need a dental referral according to the OHAT-NL. OHAT-NL and GOHAI-NL correlation was significant, but low (r = -0.226, p = 0.012).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Simplified Oral Indicator is currently not sensitive enough to identify older people in need of dental consultation. Additional education to HCNs and/or adjusting SOI may be needed. The GOHAI-NL seems not useful in dental triage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7313,"journal":{"name":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","volume":"83 ","pages":"672-681"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11707687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Odontologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/aos.v83.42487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to explore the identification of older people in need of dental consultation, with a Simplified Oral Indicator (SOI) used by home care nurses (HCNs) and with the Geriatric Oral Health Assessment Index (GOHAI-NL) completed by older people themselves, compared with the Oral Health Assessment Tool (OHAT-NL), performed by dental hygienists.

Methods: The HCNs completed SOI based on their professional view, knowledge and experience; scores red/orange/green were given to older people for oral health and oral hygiene. Older people completed the GOHAI-NL and dental hygienists completed the OHAT-NL.

Results: Data from 141 older people were analysed. Sensitivity and specificity of SOI -OHAT-NL were low (0.45 and 0.64, respectively); SOI scored only few older people as 'red', while only 11 older people did not need a dental referral according to the OHAT-NL. OHAT-NL and GOHAI-NL correlation was significant, but low (r = -0.226, p = 0.012).

Conclusion: Simplified Oral Indicator is currently not sensitive enough to identify older people in need of dental consultation. Additional education to HCNs and/or adjusting SOI may be needed. The GOHAI-NL seems not useful in dental triage.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
验证家庭护理护士将老年人转介给牙科护理专业人员的简化口腔指标。
目的:本研究旨在探讨家庭护理护士(HCNs)使用的简化口腔指标(SOI)和老年人自行完成的老年口腔健康评估指数(GOHAI-NL)与口腔卫生员使用的口腔健康评估工具(OHAT-NL)对需要牙科咨询的老年人的识别。方法:HCNs根据其专业观点、知识和经验完成SOI;老年人的口腔健康和口腔卫生得分为红色/橙色/绿色。老年人完成GOHAI-NL,牙科保健师完成OHAT-NL。结果:对141名老年人的数据进行了分析。SOI -OHAT-NL的敏感性和特异性较低(分别为0.45和0.64);根据OHAT-NL, SOI只有少数老年人被评为“红色”,而只有11名老年人不需要牙科转诊。OHAT-NL与GOHAI-NL相关性显著,但较低(r = -0.226, p = 0.012)。结论:目前简化口腔指标在识别老年人牙科会诊方面不够灵敏。可能需要对hcn进行额外的教育和/或调整SOI。GOHAI-NL在牙科分诊中似乎没有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica
Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Odontologica Scandinavica publishes papers conveying new knowledge within all areas of oral health and disease sciences.
期刊最新文献
Attracting dentists to the Swedish public dental services through the organisations' websites. Therapy and material choices in pulp exposure among public dentists in Norway. Bisphosphonate and statin: adverse effects of co-medication on wound healing in in vitro models of periodontal tissues. Comparison of oral health-related quality of life in a group of 19-year-old patients with or without previous orthodontic treatment. Expression of intracellular toll-like receptors in leukoplakia and oral squamous cell carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1