Education and mammographic breast density.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1007/s10549-024-07575-5
Syed Mahfuz Al Hasan, Kayode A Matthew, Adetunji T Toriola
{"title":"Education and mammographic breast density.","authors":"Syed Mahfuz Al Hasan, Kayode A Matthew, Adetunji T Toriola","doi":"10.1007/s10549-024-07575-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There are conflicting reports on the associations of education with mammographic breast density (MBD). To address this, we investigated the associations of education with MBD and additionally determined if and to what extent this association is mediated by known confounders such as age and adiposity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women (n = 1155) were recruited during their annual screening mammogram at the Joanne Knight Breast Health Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO. We assessed MBD using volumetric percent density (VPD; Volpara 1.5; Volpara Health<sup>®</sup>). We performed generalized linear modeling adjusted for potential confounders to estimate the differences in VPD by education level and evaluated whether associations differ by race and menopausal status. We also performed mediation analysis using PROCESS macro version 4.3. VPD was log-transformed, and back-transformed values are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women with college (n = 401) and postgraduate education (n = 396) had higher VPD (7.21% [95% CI 6.87-7.59] and 7.18% [95% CI 6.82-7.53], respectively) compared to women (n = 358) with below college education (6.62% [95% CI 6.27-7.00]; p = 0.051) in analysis adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI) and other confounders. However, the association attenuated when the analysis was adjusted for body fat% instead of BMI (college graduate: 7.26% [95% CI 6.92-7.62]; postgraduate: 7.19% [95% CI 6.85-7.55] vs. below college: 6.78% [95% CI 6.41-7.16]; p = 0.156). Body fat% and BMI mediated 71% and 64% of the association between education and VPD, respectively in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women. Associations did not differ by race.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Education was not associated with VPD after adjusting for adiposity. Adiposity mostly mediated the association between education and VPD, particularly among premenopausal women with body fat% a slightly more robust capture of adiposity than BMI.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"377-384"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07575-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There are conflicting reports on the associations of education with mammographic breast density (MBD). To address this, we investigated the associations of education with MBD and additionally determined if and to what extent this association is mediated by known confounders such as age and adiposity.

Methods: Women (n = 1155) were recruited during their annual screening mammogram at the Joanne Knight Breast Health Center at Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, MO. We assessed MBD using volumetric percent density (VPD; Volpara 1.5; Volpara Health®). We performed generalized linear modeling adjusted for potential confounders to estimate the differences in VPD by education level and evaluated whether associations differ by race and menopausal status. We also performed mediation analysis using PROCESS macro version 4.3. VPD was log-transformed, and back-transformed values are reported.

Results: Women with college (n = 401) and postgraduate education (n = 396) had higher VPD (7.21% [95% CI 6.87-7.59] and 7.18% [95% CI 6.82-7.53], respectively) compared to women (n = 358) with below college education (6.62% [95% CI 6.27-7.00]; p = 0.051) in analysis adjusted for age, body mass index (BMI) and other confounders. However, the association attenuated when the analysis was adjusted for body fat% instead of BMI (college graduate: 7.26% [95% CI 6.92-7.62]; postgraduate: 7.19% [95% CI 6.85-7.55] vs. below college: 6.78% [95% CI 6.41-7.16]; p = 0.156). Body fat% and BMI mediated 71% and 64% of the association between education and VPD, respectively in premenopausal women, but not in postmenopausal women. Associations did not differ by race.

Conclusion: Education was not associated with VPD after adjusting for adiposity. Adiposity mostly mediated the association between education and VPD, particularly among premenopausal women with body fat% a slightly more robust capture of adiposity than BMI.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
教育和乳房x光检查乳房密度。
目的:关于教育与乳房x线摄影乳腺密度(MBD)之间的关系,有相互矛盾的报道。为了解决这个问题,我们调查了教育与MBD的关系,并确定了这种关系是否以及在多大程度上受到年龄和肥胖等已知混杂因素的影响。方法:女性(n = 1155)在密苏里州圣路易斯华盛顿大学医学院Joanne Knight乳房健康中心进行年度筛查乳房x光检查时招募。我们使用体积百分比密度(VPD;Volpara 1.5;Volpara健康®)。我们采用广义线性模型校正了潜在的混杂因素,以估计受教育程度对VPD的影响,并评估其相关性是否因种族和绝经状态而异。我们还使用PROCESS宏4.3版本执行中介分析。对VPD进行对数变换,并报告反向变换值。结果:大学学历女性(n = 401)和研究生学历女性(n = 396) VPD高于大学学历以下女性(n = 358) (6.62% [95% CI 6.27-7.00])(分别为7.21% [95% CI 6.87-7.59]和7.18% [95% CI 6.82-7.53]);p = 0.051)在分析中调整了年龄、体重指数(BMI)和其他混杂因素。然而,当分析调整体脂率而不是BMI时,这种关联减弱(大学毕业生:7.26% [95% CI 6.92-7.62];研究生:7.19% [95% CI 6.85-7.55],大学以下:6.78% [95% CI 6.41-7.16];p = 0.156)。在绝经前妇女中,体脂率和BMI分别介导了71%和64%的受教育程度和VPD之间的关联,但在绝经后妇女中没有。协会没有因种族而异。结论:经肥胖因素调整后,教育程度与VPD无关。肥胖主要介导了受教育程度和VPD之间的关系,特别是在体脂%比BMI更明显的绝经前妇女中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.
期刊最新文献
Baseline and early postoperative bioimpedance spectroscopy and perometry measurements in patients treated for breast cancer: insights from a prospective screening program. Ovarian function suppression decision-making and uptake in premenopausal women with breast cancer: a mixed methods analysis. Prognostic significance of circulating tumor DNA in early breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Impact of immune-related adverse events on response to neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: a single-institution retrospective study. Investigating initial patterns of progression on first-line treatment in patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1