Analysis of practical judgment in older adults with epilepsy: An exploratory, multicenter cohort study.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1111/epi.18228
Ifrah Zawar, Anny Reyes, Kayela Arrotta, Alice D Lam, Rani Sarkis, Bruce P Hermann, Robyn M Busch, Jaideep Kapur, Emily Johnson, Sabrina Tavella-Burka, Carrie R McDonald, Vineet Punia
{"title":"Analysis of practical judgment in older adults with epilepsy: An exploratory, multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Ifrah Zawar, Anny Reyes, Kayela Arrotta, Alice D Lam, Rani Sarkis, Bruce P Hermann, Robyn M Busch, Jaideep Kapur, Emily Johnson, Sabrina Tavella-Burka, Carrie R McDonald, Vineet Punia","doi":"10.1111/epi.18228","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the high prevalence of cognitive deficits in older people with epilepsy (PWE), their ability to judge and make decisions in daily life remains unexplored. In 61 older PWE (55-90 years) from the multicenter BRain Aging and Cognition in Epilepsy (BrACE) study, we examined everyday judgment, as measured by the Test of Practical Judgment (TOP-J: 9 questions, score range = 0-27; higher score = better judgment) and evaluated its association with clinical and demographic characteristics, global cognition, neuropsychological performance, subjective cognition, and quality of life (QOL). In our participants (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 66.3 ± 6.57 years; 57.4% female), >50% scored in the range observed in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (≤21) and 10% in the range similar to people with dementia (≤16). Multivariable analysis revealed that education was the only demographic factor associated with TOP-J performance. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that lower TOP-J scores were associated with lower global cognition, language, and abstraction/executive function. Lower TOP-J scores were also associated with poorer QOL and self-reported cognitive complaints. These data suggest that the TOP-J may be a viable screening tool for early identification of reduced judgment. This could guide appropriate interventions in clinical practice, especially when older PWE present with deficits in language and executive function.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18228","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the high prevalence of cognitive deficits in older people with epilepsy (PWE), their ability to judge and make decisions in daily life remains unexplored. In 61 older PWE (55-90 years) from the multicenter BRain Aging and Cognition in Epilepsy (BrACE) study, we examined everyday judgment, as measured by the Test of Practical Judgment (TOP-J: 9 questions, score range = 0-27; higher score = better judgment) and evaluated its association with clinical and demographic characteristics, global cognition, neuropsychological performance, subjective cognition, and quality of life (QOL). In our participants (mean age ± standard deviation [SD] = 66.3 ± 6.57 years; 57.4% female), >50% scored in the range observed in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (≤21) and 10% in the range similar to people with dementia (≤16). Multivariable analysis revealed that education was the only demographic factor associated with TOP-J performance. Pearson correlation analysis revealed that lower TOP-J scores were associated with lower global cognition, language, and abstraction/executive function. Lower TOP-J scores were also associated with poorer QOL and self-reported cognitive complaints. These data suggest that the TOP-J may be a viable screening tool for early identification of reduced judgment. This could guide appropriate interventions in clinical practice, especially when older PWE present with deficits in language and executive function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
老年癫痫患者的实际判断分析:一项探索性、多中心队列研究。
尽管老年癫痫患者(PWE)中认知缺陷的患病率很高,但他们在日常生活中的判断和决策能力仍未得到探索。在多中心癫痫脑老化和认知研究的61例老年PWE(55-90岁)中,我们通过实用判断测试(TOP-J: 9题,得分范围= 0-27;得分越高=判断力越好),并评估其与临床和人口学特征、整体认知、神经心理表现、主观认知和生活质量(QOL)的关系。在我们的参与者中(平均年龄±标准差[SD] = 66.3±6.57岁;57.4%女性),>50%的评分在轻度认知障碍个体(≤21)的范围内,10%的评分在与痴呆症患者相似的范围内(≤16)。多变量分析显示,教育是与TOP-J表现相关的唯一人口统计学因素。Pearson相关分析显示,TOP-J分数越低,整体认知、语言和抽象/执行功能越低。较低的TOP-J分数也与较差的生活质量和自我报告的认知抱怨有关。这些数据表明,TOP-J可能是早期识别判断能力下降的可行筛选工具。这可以在临床实践中指导适当的干预措施,特别是当老年PWE出现语言和执行功能缺陷时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Chronic optogenetic stimulation of dentate gyrus granule cells in mouse organotypic slice cultures synaptically drives mossy cell degeneration. A multicenter cohort study on the efficacy, retention, and tolerability of cenobamate in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Acute and persistent changes in neural oscillatory activity predict development of epilepsy following acute organophosphate intoxication in adult rats. Implementing intraoperative high-density electrocorticography during epilepsy surgery. Infraslow activity as part of seizure fingerprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1