A multicenter cohort study on the efficacy, retention, and tolerability of cenobamate in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-02-11 DOI:10.1111/epi.18308
Elisa Buhleier, Susanne Schubert-Bast, Susanne Knake, Felix von Podewils, Hajo M Hamer, Nico Melzer, Gerhard Kurlemann, Kerstin Alexandra Klotz, Laurent M Willems, Felix Rosenow, Andreas Brunklaus, Adam Strzelczyk
{"title":"A multicenter cohort study on the efficacy, retention, and tolerability of cenobamate in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies.","authors":"Elisa Buhleier, Susanne Schubert-Bast, Susanne Knake, Felix von Podewils, Hajo M Hamer, Nico Melzer, Gerhard Kurlemann, Kerstin Alexandra Klotz, Laurent M Willems, Felix Rosenow, Andreas Brunklaus, Adam Strzelczyk","doi":"10.1111/epi.18308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was undertaken to evaluate retention and treatment characteristics of cenobamate (CNB) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients with DEEs who started CNB treatment between October 2020 and April 2023 at participating epilepsy centers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 patients (mean age = 28.3 ± 13.1 years, median = 26 years, range = 4-73 years; 24 male [58.5%]) were treated with CNB. Of these, 33 had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, seven had tuberous sclerosis complex, and one had Dravet syndrome. The median number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) at enrollment was three, and patients had a median of eight failed ASMs in the past. The retention rate for CNB was 94.9% at 3 months, 82.9% at 6 months, and 72.4% at 12 months of follow-up. Cumulative exposure to CNB was 477 months (39.2 years). Efficacy (50% responder rate) at 3 months was 39% including 7.3% seizure-free patients. Long-term, the 50% responder rate at 12 months was 34.5% (seizure-free [10.3%]). There was no difference in response at 3 months regarding sex, age (adult vs. children), previous and concomitant number of ASMs, or first target dose of CNB. Treatment-emergent adverse events were predominantly sedation and dizziness and were observed in 58.5% of patients. Children and adolescents showed comparable efficacy, retention, and tolerability compared to adults.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>The findings from this open-label, retrospective study suggest that CNB may be effective in some patients with DEEs. Its overall use in DEEs seems to be safe and well tolerated. We observed similar response, retention, and adverse event profiles in children and adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18308","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate retention and treatment characteristics of cenobamate (CNB) in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs) in clinical practice.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study recruited all patients with DEEs who started CNB treatment between October 2020 and April 2023 at participating epilepsy centers.

Results: A total of 41 patients (mean age = 28.3 ± 13.1 years, median = 26 years, range = 4-73 years; 24 male [58.5%]) were treated with CNB. Of these, 33 had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, seven had tuberous sclerosis complex, and one had Dravet syndrome. The median number of antiseizure medications (ASMs) at enrollment was three, and patients had a median of eight failed ASMs in the past. The retention rate for CNB was 94.9% at 3 months, 82.9% at 6 months, and 72.4% at 12 months of follow-up. Cumulative exposure to CNB was 477 months (39.2 years). Efficacy (50% responder rate) at 3 months was 39% including 7.3% seizure-free patients. Long-term, the 50% responder rate at 12 months was 34.5% (seizure-free [10.3%]). There was no difference in response at 3 months regarding sex, age (adult vs. children), previous and concomitant number of ASMs, or first target dose of CNB. Treatment-emergent adverse events were predominantly sedation and dizziness and were observed in 58.5% of patients. Children and adolescents showed comparable efficacy, retention, and tolerability compared to adults.

Significance: The findings from this open-label, retrospective study suggest that CNB may be effective in some patients with DEEs. Its overall use in DEEs seems to be safe and well tolerated. We observed similar response, retention, and adverse event profiles in children and adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究目的本研究旨在评估临床实践中发育性癫痫性脑病(DEEs)患者使用仙诺巴马特(CNB)的保留率和治疗特点:这项多中心回顾性队列研究招募了2020年10月至2023年4月期间在参与研究的癫痫中心开始接受CNB治疗的所有发育性癫痫患者:共有 41 名患者(平均年龄 = 28.3 ± 13.1 岁,中位数 = 26 岁,范围 = 4-73 岁;24 名男性 [58.5%])接受了 CNB 治疗。其中,33 名患者患有伦诺克斯-加斯科特综合征,7 名患者患有结节性硬化综合征,1 名患者患有德雷维综合征。入组时抗癫痫药物(ASMs)的中位数为 3 种,患者过去曾服用过 8 种失败的 ASMs。随访3个月时,CNB的保留率为94.9%,随访6个月时为82.9%,随访12个月时为72.4%。接受 CNB 治疗的累计时间为 477 个月(39.2 年)。3 个月的疗效(50% 的应答率)为 39%,其中 7.3% 的患者无癫痫发作。从长期来看,12 个月时的 50%应答率为 34.5%(无癫痫发作 [10.3%])。3个月时的应答情况与性别、年龄(成人与儿童)、既往和伴随的 ASMs 数量或 CNB 的首次目标剂量没有差异。治疗中出现的不良反应主要是镇静和头晕,占患者总数的58.5%。与成人相比,儿童和青少年的疗效、保留率和耐受性相当:这项开放标签、回顾性研究的结果表明,氯化萘可能对某些 DEE 患者有效。CNB在DEEs中的总体使用似乎安全且耐受性良好。我们在儿童和成人中观察到了相似的反应、保留率和不良反应情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Clinical effectiveness, feasibility, acceptability, and usability of mobile health applications for epilepsy: A systematic review. Evaluating the effectiveness of medical therapy in infantile epileptic spasms syndrome due to surgically-remediable lesions. Chronic optogenetic stimulation of dentate gyrus granule cells in mouse organotypic slice cultures synaptically drives mossy cell degeneration. A multicenter cohort study on the efficacy, retention, and tolerability of cenobamate in patients with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Acute and persistent changes in neural oscillatory activity predict development of epilepsy following acute organophosphate intoxication in adult rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1