Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of the bacteriophages PCM F/00069, PCM F/00070, PCM F/00071 and PCM F/00097 (Bafasal®) for all poultry (Proteon Pharmaceuticals S.A.)

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9132
EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Ilen Röhe, Katerina Theodoridou, Vasileios Bampidis, Pier Sandro Cocconcelli, Lieve Herman, Montserrat Anguita, Jaume Galobart, Matteo L. Innocenti, Jordi Ortuño, Rosella Brozzi
{"title":"Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of the bacteriophages PCM F/00069, PCM F/00070, PCM F/00071 and PCM F/00097 (Bafasal®) for all poultry (Proteon Pharmaceuticals S.A.)","authors":"EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP),&nbsp;Roberto Edoardo Villa,&nbsp;Giovanna Azimonti,&nbsp;Eleftherios Bonos,&nbsp;Henrik Christensen,&nbsp;Mojca Durjava,&nbsp;Birgit Dusemund,&nbsp;Ronette Gehring,&nbsp;Boet Glandorf,&nbsp;Maryline Kouba,&nbsp;Marta López-Alonso,&nbsp;Francesca Marcon,&nbsp;Carlo Nebbia,&nbsp;Alena Pechová,&nbsp;Miguel Prieto-Maradona,&nbsp;Ilen Röhe,&nbsp;Katerina Theodoridou,&nbsp;Vasileios Bampidis,&nbsp;Pier Sandro Cocconcelli,&nbsp;Lieve Herman,&nbsp;Montserrat Anguita,&nbsp;Jaume Galobart,&nbsp;Matteo L. Innocenti,&nbsp;Jordi Ortuño,&nbsp;Rosella Brozzi","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a product consisting of four bacteriophages infecting <i>Salmonella enterica</i> ser. Gallinarum B/00111, intended for be as a zootechnical additive (functional group: other zootechnical additives) for all poultry species. Bafasal® is proposed for use in water for drinking and liquid complementary feed to guarantee a minimum daily dose of 2 × 10<sup>6</sup> PFU/bird, to reduce the <i>Salmonella</i> spp. contamination of poultry carcasses and load in the environment, and to improve the zootechnical performance of the treated animals. In previous opinions, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that Bafasal® is safe for the target species, consumers and the environment and is not a skin or eye irritant but should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. No conclusion could be drawn on its dermal sensitisation potential. The additive showed the potential to decrease the counts of two Salmonella Enteritidis strains in boots swabs and caecal digesta of chickens for fattening. However, the Panel was not in the position to conclude on the capacity of Bafasal® to improve the zootechnical performance of poultry, to reduce the contamination of other <i>Salmonella enterica</i> strains, serovars or other <i>Salmonella</i> spp. in chickens, or to reduce the <i>Salmonella</i> spp. contamination of poultry other than chickens. In the current application, the claim on zootechnical performance has been withdrawn. Bafasal® is not a skin or eye irritant but should be considered a potential skin and respiratory sensitiser and inhalation and dermal exposure is considered a risk. Based on the new data provided, the Panel concluded that Bafasal® has the potential to reduce the environmental contamination with <i>S.</i> Enteritidis when used in feed and water for all poultry species. No conclusions could be drawn on the effects of the additive on other <i>Salmonella</i> serotypes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"22 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647178/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.9132","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety and efficacy of a product consisting of four bacteriophages infecting Salmonella enterica ser. Gallinarum B/00111, intended for be as a zootechnical additive (functional group: other zootechnical additives) for all poultry species. Bafasal® is proposed for use in water for drinking and liquid complementary feed to guarantee a minimum daily dose of 2 × 106 PFU/bird, to reduce the Salmonella spp. contamination of poultry carcasses and load in the environment, and to improve the zootechnical performance of the treated animals. In previous opinions, the FEEDAP Panel concluded that Bafasal® is safe for the target species, consumers and the environment and is not a skin or eye irritant but should be considered a respiratory sensitiser. No conclusion could be drawn on its dermal sensitisation potential. The additive showed the potential to decrease the counts of two Salmonella Enteritidis strains in boots swabs and caecal digesta of chickens for fattening. However, the Panel was not in the position to conclude on the capacity of Bafasal® to improve the zootechnical performance of poultry, to reduce the contamination of other Salmonella enterica strains, serovars or other Salmonella spp. in chickens, or to reduce the Salmonella spp. contamination of poultry other than chickens. In the current application, the claim on zootechnical performance has been withdrawn. Bafasal® is not a skin or eye irritant but should be considered a potential skin and respiratory sensitiser and inhalation and dermal exposure is considered a risk. Based on the new data provided, the Panel concluded that Bafasal® has the potential to reduce the environmental contamination with S. Enteritidis when used in feed and water for all poultry species. No conclusions could be drawn on the effects of the additive on other Salmonella serotypes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
由噬菌体PCM F/00069、PCM F/00070、PCM F/00071和PCM F/00097 (basasal®)组成的饲料添加剂用于所有家禽的安全性和有效性(Proteon Pharmaceuticals S.A.)。
应欧盟委员会的要求,欧洲食品安全局被要求就一种由四种感染肠道沙门氏菌的噬菌体组成的产品的安全性和有效性发表科学意见。Gallinarum B/00111,拟作为所有家禽品种的动物添加剂(功能组:其他动物添加剂)。Bafasal®被建议用于饮用水和液体补充饲料中,以保证最低日剂量为2 × 106 PFU/只,减少家禽胴体和环境中沙门氏菌的污染,提高处理动物的动物技术性能。在之前的意见中,FEEDAP小组得出结论,Bafasal®对目标物种、消费者和环境是安全的,对皮肤或眼睛没有刺激性,但应被视为呼吸致敏剂。没有结论可以得出其皮肤致敏潜力。该添加剂显示有可能减少育肥鸡靴擦和盲肠食糜中两种肠炎沙门氏菌的计数。然而,专家小组无法就basasal®改善家禽动物技术性能的能力、减少其他肠道沙门氏菌菌株、血清型或其他沙门氏菌在鸡体内的污染的能力,或减少沙门氏菌对除鸡以外的家禽的污染的能力得出结论。在目前的申请中,关于动物技术性能的声明已被撤回。basasal®对皮肤或眼睛没有刺激性,但应被认为是潜在的皮肤和呼吸道致敏剂,吸入和皮肤暴露被认为是一种风险。根据提供的新数据,专家小组得出结论,在所有家禽品种的饲料和水中使用Bafasal®时,有可能减少肠炎沙门氏菌对环境的污染。该添加剂对其他血清型沙门氏菌的影响尚未得出结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance cyprodinil Safety evaluation of the food enzyme acylglycerol lipase from the genetically modified Penicillium sp. strain AE-LGS Flavouring group evaluation 418 (FGE. 418): 3-[3-(2-isopropyl-5-methyl-cyclohexyl)-ureido]-butyric acid ethyl ester Re-evaluation of butane (E 943a), isobutane (E 943b) and propane (E 944) as food additives Safety evaluation of the food enzyme α-amylase from the non-genetically modified Aspergillus sp. strain FUA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1