Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurological Research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022
Marina Barbosa da Silva, Domênica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira Ferreira, Cristian D Mendieta, Hamilcar Pereira da Silva, Lívia Aguiar Nogueira-Rosa, Nathalia Moraes-Figueiredo
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for cluster headache preventive treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Marina Barbosa da Silva, Domênica Baroni Coelho de Oliveira Ferreira, Cristian D Mendieta, Hamilcar Pereira da Silva, Lívia Aguiar Nogueira-Rosa, Nathalia Moraes-Figueiredo","doi":"10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 ± 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.</p>","PeriodicalId":19131,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Research","volume":" ","pages":"63-76"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01616412.2024.2440022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Galcanezumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting the CGRP pathway and represents the latest disease-specific and mechanism-based therapeutic option for cluster headache (CH).

Objective: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for CH.

Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for studies implementing galcanezumab for episodic and chronic CH. We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Reporting Guidelines for Meta-analyses of Observational Studies (MOOSE) guidelines. The primary outcome was efficacy, defined by a reduction from the baseline of at least 50% in the weekly frequency of CH attacks and the Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I). Secondary outcomes included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs).

Results: A total of 504 patients were included from 6 studies, of which 2 were RCTs. The follow-up period ranged from 3 weeks to 15 months. The mean age was 44.4 ± 10.2 years, with 24.4% female patients. Overall efficacy was 76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), TEAEs were observed in 48.0% of patients (95% CI 0.25-0.72), and the most common were nasopharyngitis, local injection pain, and local injection swelling. TEAEs were, however, considerably higher within the 300 mg dose group compared with the 240 mg dose group, 80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87) versus 28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47), respectively.

Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that galcanezumab is effective in reducing the number of CH attacks and can be considered a safe medication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
galcanezumab用于丛集性头痛预防治疗的有效性和安全性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:Galcanezumab是一种靶向CGRP通路的单克隆抗体,是治疗丛集性头痛(CH)的最新疾病特异性和基于机制的治疗选择。目的:我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估galcanezumab治疗CH的疗效和安全性。方法:我们检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中使用galcanezumab治疗发作性和慢性CH的研究。我们遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)和观察性研究荟萃分析报告指南(MOOSE)指南。主要结果是疗效,由每周CH发作频率和患者总体印象改善量表(PGI-I)从基线降低至少50%来定义。次要结局包括治疗中出现的不良事件(teae)和严重不良事件(sae)。结果:6项研究共纳入504例患者,其中2项为随机对照试验。随访时间为3周到15个月。平均年龄44.4±10.2岁,女性占24.4%。总有效率为76.0% (95% CI 0.67-0.85), teae发生率为48.0% (95% CI 0.25-0.72),最常见的是鼻咽炎、局部注射痛和局部注射肿胀。然而,与240 mg剂量组相比,300 mg剂量组的teae明显更高,分别为80.0% (95% CI 0.65-0.87)和28.0% (95% CI 0.12-0.47)。结论:这项荟萃分析表明,galcanezumab可有效减少CH发作次数,可被认为是一种安全的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurological Research
Neurological Research 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
116
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Neurological Research is an international, peer-reviewed journal for reporting both basic and clinical research in the fields of neurosurgery, neurology, neuroengineering and neurosciences. It provides a medium for those who recognize the wider implications of their work and who wish to be informed of the relevant experience of others in related and more distant fields. The scope of the journal includes: •Stem cell applications •Molecular neuroscience •Neuropharmacology •Neuroradiology •Neurochemistry •Biomathematical models •Endovascular neurosurgery •Innovation in neurosurgery.
期刊最新文献
Central administration of p234, kisspeptin antagonist, but not kisspeptin-10, reduces the power of epileptiform activity and slow EEG waves in male rats. Revisiting sinking skin flap syndrome: a series of case reports and literature review on cranioplasty with PEEK implants. Intravenous lidocaine for the treatment of sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study. The effect of eight weeks of aerobic training with vitamin C on some apoptotic markers in the hippocampus tissue of rats with Alzheimer's disease; an experimental study. The relationship between smoking and clinical outcome in ischemic stroke patients undergoing reperfusion therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1