Efficacy of different dietary therapy strategies in active pediatric Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 2.4 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES PeerJ Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18692
Jiaze Ma, Jinchen Chong, Zhengxi Qiu, Yuji Wang, Tuo Chen, Yugen Chen
{"title":"Efficacy of different dietary therapy strategies in active pediatric Crohn's disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiaze Ma, Jinchen Chong, Zhengxi Qiu, Yuji Wang, Tuo Chen, Yugen Chen","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dietary therapy strategies play an important role in the treatment of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD), but the relative efficacy of different dietary therapy strategies for Crohn's remission is unknown. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of these dietary therapy strategies for active pediatric CD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the medical literature up to August 30, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dietary therapy strategies for pediatric CD. The primary outcomes were clinical remission rate and tolerance, secondary outcomes included differences between pre- and post-treatment levels of albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin levels. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by using the frequentist model. For binary outcome variables and continuous outcome variables, odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized, respectively. The ranking of dietary therapy strategies was determined based on the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for each comparison analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 14 studies involving 564 participants were included. In terms of clinical remission rate, the partial enteral nutrition (PEN) plus Crohn's disease exclusion diet (PEN+CDED) (OR = 7.86, 95% CI [1.85-33.40]) and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) (OR = 3.74, 95% CI [1.30-10.76]) exhibited significant superiority over PEN alone. The tolerance of PEN+CDED was significantly higher than that of EEN (OR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.01-0.61]). According to the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values, the PEN+CDED intervention (90.5%) achieved the highest ranking in clinical remission rate. In terms of tolerance, PEN+CDED ranked first (88.0%), while EEN ranked last (16.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In conclusion, PEN+CDED was associated with the highest clinical remission rate and tolerance among the various dietary therapy strategies evaluated. Despite limitations in the studies, this systematic review provides evidence that PEN+CDED can be used as an alternative treatment to exclusive enteral nutrition and is more suitable for long-term management in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"12 ","pages":"e18692"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11648686/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18692","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dietary therapy strategies play an important role in the treatment of pediatric patients with Crohn's disease (CD), but the relative efficacy of different dietary therapy strategies for Crohn's remission is unknown. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and tolerance of these dietary therapy strategies for active pediatric CD.

Methods: We searched the medical literature up to August 30, 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of dietary therapy strategies for pediatric CD. The primary outcomes were clinical remission rate and tolerance, secondary outcomes included differences between pre- and post-treatment levels of albumin, C-reactive protein (CRP), and fecal calprotectin levels. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed by using the frequentist model. For binary outcome variables and continuous outcome variables, odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were utilized, respectively. The ranking of dietary therapy strategies was determined based on the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) for each comparison analyzed.

Results: Overall, 14 studies involving 564 participants were included. In terms of clinical remission rate, the partial enteral nutrition (PEN) plus Crohn's disease exclusion diet (PEN+CDED) (OR = 7.86, 95% CI [1.85-33.40]) and exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN) (OR = 3.74, 95% CI [1.30-10.76]) exhibited significant superiority over PEN alone. The tolerance of PEN+CDED was significantly higher than that of EEN (OR = 0.07, 95% CI [0.01-0.61]). According to the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) values, the PEN+CDED intervention (90.5%) achieved the highest ranking in clinical remission rate. In terms of tolerance, PEN+CDED ranked first (88.0%), while EEN ranked last (16.3%).

Conclusions: In conclusion, PEN+CDED was associated with the highest clinical remission rate and tolerance among the various dietary therapy strategies evaluated. Despite limitations in the studies, this systematic review provides evidence that PEN+CDED can be used as an alternative treatment to exclusive enteral nutrition and is more suitable for long-term management in children.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同饮食治疗策略对活动性儿童克罗恩病的疗效:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
背景:饮食治疗策略在克罗恩病(CD)儿科患者的治疗中发挥着重要作用,但不同饮食治疗策略对克罗恩病缓解的相对疗效尚不清楚。方法:我们检索了截至2024年8月30日的医学文献,以确定儿童CD饮食治疗策略的随机对照试验(rct)。主要结局是临床缓解率和耐受性,次要结局包括治疗前后白蛋白、c反应蛋白(CRP)和粪便钙保护蛋白水平的差异。采用频率模型进行网络元分析(NMA)。对于二元结局变量和连续结局变量,分别采用比值比(OR)和平均差异(MD)及其相应的95%置信区间(CI)。根据所分析的每个比较的累积排序面积(SUCRA)下的表面来确定饮食治疗策略的排名。结果:总共纳入了14项研究,涉及564名参与者。在临床缓解率方面,部分肠内营养(PEN)联合克罗恩病排除饮食(PEN+CDED) (OR = 7.86, 95% CI[1.85-33.40])和完全肠内营养(EEN) (OR = 3.74, 95% CI[1.30-10.76])比单独使用PEN具有显著优势。PEN+CDED的耐受性显著高于EEN (OR = 0.07, 95% CI[0.01-0.61])。根据累积排序面积(SUCRA)值,PEN+CDED干预在临床缓解率上排名最高(90.5%)。在容忍度方面,PEN+CDED排名第一(88.0%),EEN排名最后(16.3%)。结论:在评估的各种饮食治疗策略中,PEN+CDED与最高的临床缓解率和耐受性相关。尽管研究存在局限性,但本系统综述提供的证据表明,PEN+CDED可以作为单独肠内营养的替代治疗方法,更适合儿童的长期治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
期刊最新文献
Cross-cultural validation of the birth memories and recall questionnaire: a cross-sectional study among Chinese postpartum women. Mirror feedback in Zumba dance education: effects on proprioception, balance and mood state. Dental microplastics as emerging neurotoxicants: a systematic review on human data. Ontogenetic shifts in sound production and shared sonic mechanisms in two priacanthid fishes. Effects of probiotic supplementation on immune and inflammatory markers in athletes: an umbrella review and re-analysis of published meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1