Sensory feedback modulates Weber's law of both perception and action.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY Journal of Vision Pub Date : 2024-12-02 DOI:10.1167/jov.24.13.10
Ailin Deng, Evan Cesanek, Fulvio Domini
{"title":"Sensory feedback modulates Weber's law of both perception and action.","authors":"Ailin Deng, Evan Cesanek, Fulvio Domini","doi":"10.1167/jov.24.13.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Weber's law states that estimation noise is proportional to stimulus intensity. Although this holds in perception, it appears absent in visually guided actions where response variability does not scale with object size. This discrepancy is often attributed to dissociated visual processing for perception and action. Here, we explore an alternative explanation: It is the influence of sensory feedback on motor output that causes this apparent violation. Our research investigated response variability across repeated grasps relative to object size and found that the variability pattern is contingent on sensory feedback. Pantomime grasps with neither online visual feedback nor final haptic feedback showed variability that scaled with object size, as expected by Weber's law. However, this scaling diminished when sensory feedback was available, either directly present in the movement (Experiment 1) or in adjacent movements in the same block (Experiment 2). Moreover, a simple visual cue indicating performance error similarly reduced the scaling of variability with object size in manual size estimates, the perceptual counterpart of grasping responses (Experiment 3). These results support the hypothesis that sensory feedback modulates motor responses and their associated variability across both action and perception tasks. Post hoc analyses indicated that the reduced scaling of response variability with object size could be due to changes in motor mapping, the process mapping visual size estimates to motor outputs. Consequently, the absence of Weber's law in action responses might not indicate distinct visual processing but rather adaptive changes in motor strategies based on sensory feedback.</p>","PeriodicalId":49955,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vision","volume":"24 13","pages":"10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654771/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vision","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.24.13.10","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Weber's law states that estimation noise is proportional to stimulus intensity. Although this holds in perception, it appears absent in visually guided actions where response variability does not scale with object size. This discrepancy is often attributed to dissociated visual processing for perception and action. Here, we explore an alternative explanation: It is the influence of sensory feedback on motor output that causes this apparent violation. Our research investigated response variability across repeated grasps relative to object size and found that the variability pattern is contingent on sensory feedback. Pantomime grasps with neither online visual feedback nor final haptic feedback showed variability that scaled with object size, as expected by Weber's law. However, this scaling diminished when sensory feedback was available, either directly present in the movement (Experiment 1) or in adjacent movements in the same block (Experiment 2). Moreover, a simple visual cue indicating performance error similarly reduced the scaling of variability with object size in manual size estimates, the perceptual counterpart of grasping responses (Experiment 3). These results support the hypothesis that sensory feedback modulates motor responses and their associated variability across both action and perception tasks. Post hoc analyses indicated that the reduced scaling of response variability with object size could be due to changes in motor mapping, the process mapping visual size estimates to motor outputs. Consequently, the absence of Weber's law in action responses might not indicate distinct visual processing but rather adaptive changes in motor strategies based on sensory feedback.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
感觉反馈调节了韦伯的感知和行动定律。
韦伯定律指出,估计噪声与刺激强度成正比。虽然这一定律在感知中成立,但在视觉引导的行动中却似乎不存在,因为在视觉引导的行动中,反应的可变性并不随物体的大小而变化。这种差异通常被归因于感知和行动的视觉处理过程相互分离。在此,我们探索另一种解释:正是感觉反馈对运动输出的影响导致了这种明显的违背。我们的研究调查了重复抓握时相对于物体大小的反应变异,发现这种变异模式取决于感觉反馈。在既无在线视觉反馈也无最终触觉反馈的情况下进行的哑剧抓握,其变异性与物体大小成比例,正如韦伯定律所预期的那样。然而,当有感官反馈时,这种比例关系就会减弱,这种反馈要么直接出现在动作中(实验 1),要么出现在同一区块的相邻动作中(实验 2)。此外,一个简单的视觉提示表明操作失误,也同样降低了手动大小估计(抓取反应的知觉对应物)中变异性与物体大小的比例关系(实验 3)。这些结果支持了感觉反馈调节动作反应及其在动作和知觉任务中的相关变异性的假设。事后分析表明,反应变异性随物体大小的比例降低可能是由于运动映射的变化,即视觉大小估计到运动输出的映射过程。因此,行动反应中韦伯定律的缺失可能并不表明视觉处理过程的独特性,而是基于感觉反馈的运动策略的适应性变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vision
Journal of Vision 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
218
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Exploring all aspects of biological visual function, including spatial vision, perception, low vision, color vision and more, spanning the fields of neuroscience, psychology and psychophysics.
期刊最新文献
Impaired visual perceptual accuracy in the upper visual field induces asymmetric performance in position estimation for falling and rising objects. Anticipatory smooth pursuit eye movements scale with the probability of visual motion: The role of target speed and acceleration. Benchmarking the speed-accuracy tradeoff in object recognition by humans and neural networks. Effect of sign language learning on temporal resolution of visual attention. Improving the reliability and accuracy of population receptive field measures using a logarithmically warped stimulus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1