Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion Compared with Invasive Physiology in Patients with Stents: The Advantage 2 Study.

IF 12.1 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Radiology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1148/radiol.232225
Daniele Andreini, Saima Mushtaq, Daniela Trabattoni, Edoardo Conte, Jeroen Sonck, Gerardo Lorusso, Stefano Galli, Giovanni Monizzi, Marta Belmonte, Luca Grancini, Giovanni Teruzzi, Sarah Troiano, Sebastiano Gili, Piero Montorsi, Paolo Olivares, Vincenzo Mallia, Davide Marchetti, Matteo Schillaci, Emanuele Gallinoro, Pasquale Paolisso, Carlo Gigante, Eleonora Melotti, Andrea Baggiano, Maria Elisabetta Mancini, Andrea Annoni, Alberto Formenti, Koshiro Sakai, Takuya Mizukami, Gianluca Pontone, Lorenza Zanotto, Antonio L Bartorelli, Carlos Collet
{"title":"Diagnostic Accuracy of Dynamic Stress Myocardial CT Perfusion Compared with Invasive Physiology in Patients with Stents: The Advantage 2 Study.","authors":"Daniele Andreini, Saima Mushtaq, Daniela Trabattoni, Edoardo Conte, Jeroen Sonck, Gerardo Lorusso, Stefano Galli, Giovanni Monizzi, Marta Belmonte, Luca Grancini, Giovanni Teruzzi, Sarah Troiano, Sebastiano Gili, Piero Montorsi, Paolo Olivares, Vincenzo Mallia, Davide Marchetti, Matteo Schillaci, Emanuele Gallinoro, Pasquale Paolisso, Carlo Gigante, Eleonora Melotti, Andrea Baggiano, Maria Elisabetta Mancini, Andrea Annoni, Alberto Formenti, Koshiro Sakai, Takuya Mizukami, Gianluca Pontone, Lorenza Zanotto, Antonio L Bartorelli, Carlos Collet","doi":"10.1148/radiol.232225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background The detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is challenging, but CT perfusion (CTP) has demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy over CCTA in patients with stents. However, there are limited data on the performance of dynamic CTP, which allows noninvasive adjudication of regional myocardial blood flow. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of regadenoson-stress dynamic CTP with that of CCTA, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as reference standards for epicardial coronary circulation and coronary microcirculation, respectively. Materials and Methods Between January 2021 and June 2022, this prospective study enrolled patients with stents with indication for invasive coronary angiography due to suspicion of ISR or coronary artery disease progression. Participants underwent dynamic stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP plus CCTA. A wide coverage (z-axis coverage, 16 cm) and fast (gantry rotation time, 0.28 second) scanner was used. During invasive coronary angiography, FFR and IMR were obtained. The diagnostic rate (number of interpretable territories divided by number of evaluated territories) and accuracy of CCTA and CTP were evaluated in a territory-based analysis and compared with FFR and IMR (primary end points of the study). Results The study included 156 consecutive patients (136 men [87%]; mean age, 63.1 years ± 8.2 [SD]) with 504 stents. The diagnostic rate was higher for CTP than for CCTA (98.7% [789 of 799 territories] vs 95.6% [764 of 799 territories], <i>P</i> < .001). With use of FFR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher for CTP than for CCTA (89.0%, 82.8%, and 84.7%, respectively, vs 60.0%, 61.9%, and 61.5%; <i>P</i> < .001). With use of IMR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher with CTP than with CCTA (76.5%, 85.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, vs 48.2%, 63.5%, and 59.3%; <i>P</i> < .01). The mean effective dose of stress CTP plus CCTA was 10.4 mSv ± 2.7. Conclusion In patients with coronary stents, dynamic CTP improves the diagnostic performance of CCTA in the detection of territory-based ischemia. © RSNA, 2024 <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> See also the editorial by Williams in this issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":20896,"journal":{"name":"Radiology","volume":"313 3","pages":"e232225"},"PeriodicalIF":12.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.232225","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background The detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR) with coronary CT angiography (CCTA) is challenging, but CT perfusion (CTP) has demonstrated improved diagnostic accuracy over CCTA in patients with stents. However, there are limited data on the performance of dynamic CTP, which allows noninvasive adjudication of regional myocardial blood flow. Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of regadenoson-stress dynamic CTP with that of CCTA, using fractional flow reserve (FFR) and the index of microvascular resistance (IMR) as reference standards for epicardial coronary circulation and coronary microcirculation, respectively. Materials and Methods Between January 2021 and June 2022, this prospective study enrolled patients with stents with indication for invasive coronary angiography due to suspicion of ISR or coronary artery disease progression. Participants underwent dynamic stress myocardial CTP and rest CTP plus CCTA. A wide coverage (z-axis coverage, 16 cm) and fast (gantry rotation time, 0.28 second) scanner was used. During invasive coronary angiography, FFR and IMR were obtained. The diagnostic rate (number of interpretable territories divided by number of evaluated territories) and accuracy of CCTA and CTP were evaluated in a territory-based analysis and compared with FFR and IMR (primary end points of the study). Results The study included 156 consecutive patients (136 men [87%]; mean age, 63.1 years ± 8.2 [SD]) with 504 stents. The diagnostic rate was higher for CTP than for CCTA (98.7% [789 of 799 territories] vs 95.6% [764 of 799 territories], P < .001). With use of FFR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher for CTP than for CCTA (89.0%, 82.8%, and 84.7%, respectively, vs 60.0%, 61.9%, and 61.5%; P < .001). With use of IMR as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were higher with CTP than with CCTA (76.5%, 85.9%, and 82.9%, respectively, vs 48.2%, 63.5%, and 59.3%; P < .01). The mean effective dose of stress CTP plus CCTA was 10.4 mSv ± 2.7. Conclusion In patients with coronary stents, dynamic CTP improves the diagnostic performance of CCTA in the detection of territory-based ischemia. © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Williams in this issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
动态应激心肌 CT 灌注与有创生理学相比对支架患者的诊断准确性:优势 2 号研究
冠脉CT血管造影(CCTA)检测支架内再狭窄(ISR)具有挑战性,但CT灌注(CTP)在支架患者中的诊断准确性优于CCTA。然而,关于动态CTP性能的数据有限,它可以对局部心肌血流进行无创判断。目的以血流储备分数(FFR)和微血管阻力指数(IMR)分别作为心外膜冠状动脉循环和冠状动脉微循环的参考标准,比较regadenoson-stress dynamic CTP与CCTA的诊断价值。材料和方法在2021年1月至2022年6月期间,本前瞻性研究纳入了因怀疑ISR或冠状动脉疾病进展而接受有创冠状动脉造影的支架患者。参与者分别接受动态应激心肌CTP和静息CTP + CCTA。采用宽覆盖(z轴覆盖,16 cm)和快速(龙门旋转时间,0.28秒)扫描仪。有创冠状动脉造影时,测量FFR和IMR。在基于区域的分析中评估CCTA和CTP的诊断率(可解释区域数除以评估区域数)和准确性,并与FFR和IMR(研究的主要终点)进行比较。结果研究纳入156例连续患者(136例男性,87%);平均年龄63.1岁±8.2 [SD]),支架504个。CTP的诊断率高于CCTA (98.7% [789 / 799] vs 95.6% [764 / 799], P < 0.001)。以FFR作为参考标准,CTP的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性均高于CCTA(分别为89.0%、82.8%和84.7%),而CCTA为60.0%、61.9%和61.5%;P < 0.001)。以IMR为参考标准,CTP的敏感性、特异性和诊断准确性均高于CCTA(分别为76.5%、85.9%和82.9%,分别为48.2%、63.5%和59.3%;P < 0.01)。应激CTP加CCTA的平均有效剂量为10.4 mSv±2.7。结论在冠脉支架患者中,动态CTP提高了CCTA检测区域性缺血的诊断效能。©RSNA, 2024本文可获得补充材料。参见威廉姆斯在本期的社论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology
Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
35.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
596
审稿时长
3.6 months
期刊介绍: Published regularly since 1923 by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), Radiology has long been recognized as the authoritative reference for the most current, clinically relevant and highest quality research in the field of radiology. Each month the journal publishes approximately 240 pages of peer-reviewed original research, authoritative reviews, well-balanced commentary on significant articles, and expert opinion on new techniques and technologies. Radiology publishes cutting edge and impactful imaging research articles in radiology and medical imaging in order to help improve human health.
期刊最新文献
A Leadership Primer. COVID-19 Infection and Coronary Plaque Progression: An Early Warning of a Potential Public Health Crisis. Advancing Care: Managing Small Late-Recurrence Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Image-guided Therapy. AI-generated Clinical Histories for Radiology Reports: Closing the Information Gap. CT Honeycombing and Traction Bronchiectasis Extent Independently Predict Survival across Fibrotic Interstitial Lung Disease Subtypes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1