Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1093/jamia/ocae305
Steven Crook, Glenn Rosenbluth, David V Glidden, Alicia Fernandez, Chuan-Mei Lee, Lizette Avina, Leslie Magana, Kiana Washington, Naomi S Bardach
{"title":"Variations in digital health literacy for pediatric caregivers of hospitalized children: implications for digital health equity.","authors":"Steven Crook, Glenn Rosenbluth, David V Glidden, Alicia Fernandez, Chuan-Mei Lee, Lizette Avina, Leslie Magana, Kiana Washington, Naomi S Bardach","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocae305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to assess whether race, ethnicity, and preferred language were associated with digital health literacy in pediatric caregivers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We used linear regression to measure associations between 3 eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) domains (score range: 1-4) and demographic characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Non-Latinx White respondents (n = 230) had highest adjusted mean eHLQ scores: 3.44 (95% confidence interval: 3.36-3.52) in \"Ability to engage,\" 3.39 (3.31 to 3.47) in \"Feel safe and in control,\" and 3.34 (3.25 to 3.41) in \"Motivated.\" By contrast, Spanish-preferring Latinx respondents (n = 246) had lower adjusted mean scores across all 3 eHLQ domains: 2.97 (P < .0001), 3.21 (P = .004), and 3.19 (P = .033), respectively.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study contributes insights in variations across ethnoracial and language preference groups by different eHLQ domains, with implications for addressing digital health inequities.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital health literacy was lower in Spanish-preferring Latinx pediatric caregivers compared to non-Latinx White caregivers across 3 eHLQ domains. It was lower than English-preferring Latinx caregivers in \"Ability.\"</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocae305","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: We sought to assess whether race, ethnicity, and preferred language were associated with digital health literacy in pediatric caregivers.

Materials and methods: We used linear regression to measure associations between 3 eHealth Literacy Questionnaire (eHLQ) domains (score range: 1-4) and demographic characteristics.

Results: Non-Latinx White respondents (n = 230) had highest adjusted mean eHLQ scores: 3.44 (95% confidence interval: 3.36-3.52) in "Ability to engage," 3.39 (3.31 to 3.47) in "Feel safe and in control," and 3.34 (3.25 to 3.41) in "Motivated." By contrast, Spanish-preferring Latinx respondents (n = 246) had lower adjusted mean scores across all 3 eHLQ domains: 2.97 (P < .0001), 3.21 (P = .004), and 3.19 (P = .033), respectively.

Discussion: Our study contributes insights in variations across ethnoracial and language preference groups by different eHLQ domains, with implications for addressing digital health inequities.

Conclusion: Digital health literacy was lower in Spanish-preferring Latinx pediatric caregivers compared to non-Latinx White caregivers across 3 eHLQ domains. It was lower than English-preferring Latinx caregivers in "Ability."

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
目的: 我们试图评估种族、民族和首选语言是否与儿科护理人员的数字健康素养有关:我们试图评估种族、民族和首选语言是否与儿科护理人员的数字健康素养有关:我们使用线性回归法测量了电子健康素养问卷(eHLQ)的 3 个领域(得分范围:1-4)与人口统计学特征之间的关联:非拉丁裔白人受访者(n = 230)的调整后平均 eHLQ 分数最高:参与能力 "为 3.44(95% 置信区间:3.36-3.52)分,"安全感和控制力 "为 3.39(3.31-3.47)分,"积极性 "为 3.34(3.25-3.41)分。相比之下,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔受访者(n = 246)在所有 3 个 eHLQ 领域的调整后平均得分较低:2.97(P 讨论):我们的研究有助于深入了解不同种族和语言偏好群体在不同 eHLQ 领域的差异,对解决数字健康不平等问题具有重要意义:结论:与非拉丁裔白人儿科护理人员相比,偏好西班牙语的拉丁裔儿科护理人员在 3 个 eHLQ 领域的数字健康素养较低。在 "能力 "方面,拉丁裔护理人员的数字健康素养低于英语优先的护理人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
期刊最新文献
The substance-exposed birthing person-infant/child dyad and health information exchange in the United States. Reducing diagnostic delays in acute hepatic porphyria using health records data and machine learning. Implementation and impact of an electronic patient reported outcomes system in a phase II multi-site adaptive platform clinical trial for early-stage breast cancer. Increasing adherence and collecting symptom-specific biometric signals in remote monitoring of heart failure patients: a randomized controlled trial. Correction to: Are medical history data fit for risk stratification of patients with chest pain in emergency care? Comparing data collected from patients using computerized history taking with data documented by physicians in the electronic health record in the CLEOS-CPDS prospective cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1