Remote Consultations in General Practice in Ireland: Who Is Missing Out?

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0503
Ellen McHugh, Sheelah Connolly
{"title":"Remote Consultations in General Practice in Ireland: Who Is Missing Out?","authors":"Ellen McHugh, Sheelah Connolly","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction</b>: This research examines the characteristics associated with the use of remote consultations in general practice in Ireland during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. <b>Methods</b>: The analysis uses three waves of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of health in Ireland (\"Healthy Ireland\" survey), relating to the years 2020/2021, 2021/2022, and 2022/2023. The sample includes people aged 15 and over who reported seeing a general practitioner (GP) in the 4 weeks prior to the survey. The outcome variable (\"remote consultation\") captures whether a respondent reported that their most recent GP consultation took place via telephone or video (\"remote consultation\"). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the likelihood of having a remote consultation and a range of potential explanatory variables including age, gender, insurance status, and socioeconomic status. <b>Results</b>: There was a significant decrease in the percentage of respondents reporting remote consultations over the period of analysis, from 39% in 2020/2021 to 10% in 2022/2023. In later periods, being female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47 [1.04, 2.09]), having private health insurance (OR = 1.76 [1.13, 2.73]), and having a long-term health condition (OR = 1.53 [0.98, 2.39]) were positively associated with the probability of reporting a remote consultation, while being in an older age group (OR = 0.29 [0.13, 0.62]) was negatively associated with the likelihood of a remote consultation. <b>Discussion</b>: The high prevalence of remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic was not maintained in the postpandemic period. Policymakers should consider the reasons for this and consider the gendered, age-based, and insurance-based disparities in remote consultation utilization in the development and promotion of digital health care.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0503","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This research examines the characteristics associated with the use of remote consultations in general practice in Ireland during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: The analysis uses three waves of a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of health in Ireland ("Healthy Ireland" survey), relating to the years 2020/2021, 2021/2022, and 2022/2023. The sample includes people aged 15 and over who reported seeing a general practitioner (GP) in the 4 weeks prior to the survey. The outcome variable ("remote consultation") captures whether a respondent reported that their most recent GP consultation took place via telephone or video ("remote consultation"). Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the likelihood of having a remote consultation and a range of potential explanatory variables including age, gender, insurance status, and socioeconomic status. Results: There was a significant decrease in the percentage of respondents reporting remote consultations over the period of analysis, from 39% in 2020/2021 to 10% in 2022/2023. In later periods, being female (odds ratio [OR] = 1.47 [1.04, 2.09]), having private health insurance (OR = 1.76 [1.13, 2.73]), and having a long-term health condition (OR = 1.53 [0.98, 2.39]) were positively associated with the probability of reporting a remote consultation, while being in an older age group (OR = 0.29 [0.13, 0.62]) was negatively associated with the likelihood of a remote consultation. Discussion: The high prevalence of remote consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic was not maintained in the postpandemic period. Policymakers should consider the reasons for this and consider the gendered, age-based, and insurance-based disparities in remote consultation utilization in the development and promotion of digital health care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱尔兰全科医生远程会诊:谁错过了?
导言:本研究探讨了 COVID-19 大流行期间和之后爱尔兰全科医生使用远程会诊的相关特点。研究方法分析使用了爱尔兰具有全国代表性的横断面健康调查("健康爱尔兰 "调查)的三个波次,分别涉及 2020/2021、2021/2022 和 2022/2023。样本包括 15 岁及以上、在调查前 4 周内曾报告看全科医生(GP)的人。结果变量("远程会诊")捕捉受访者是否报告其最近一次全科医生会诊是通过电话或视频进行的("远程会诊")。我们使用逻辑回归分析来评估接受远程会诊的可能性与一系列潜在解释变量(包括年龄、性别、保险状况和社会经济地位)之间的关系。结果显示在分析期间,报告远程会诊的受访者比例明显下降,从 2020/2021 年的 39% 降至 2022/2023 年的 10%。在后期,女性(比值比 [OR] = 1.47 [1.04, 2.09])、拥有私人医疗保险(比值比 = 1.76 [1.13, 2.73])和长期健康状况(比值比 = 1.53 [0.98, 2.39])与报告远程会诊的可能性呈正相关,而年龄较大(比值比 = 0.29 [0.13, 0.62])与远程会诊的可能性呈负相关。讨论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,远程会诊的高流行率在大流行后并没有得到维持。政策制定者应考虑造成这种情况的原因,并在开发和推广数字医疗保健时考虑远程会诊利用率方面的性别、年龄和保险差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
期刊最新文献
When Are Single Reader Evaluations Insufficient in Teledermoscopic Assessments? Analyses of a Retrospective Cohort Study. Same as It Ever Was. A Systematic Review of Telemedicine Solutions to Provide Psychological Interventions for Women Receiving Fertility Treatments. Experience of The National Emergency Tele-Critical Care Network. Post-Telemedicine Acute Care for Undifferentiated High-Acuity Conditions: Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1