The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine.

IF 2.7 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY British Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/1468-4446.13171
Daria Khlevniuk, Gn, Boris Noordenbos
{"title":"The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine.","authors":"Daria Khlevniuk, Gn, Boris Noordenbos","doi":"10.1111/1468-4446.13171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper seeks to enhance memory studies' conceptual toolkit by reconsidering established perspectives on \"memory politics.\" The paper theorizes various modes of temporal connectivity cultivated through politicized references to a shared past. Our empirical case is focused on a collection of roughly 5.000 recent articles about the war in Ukraine from major Russian state-aligned news outlets. We analyze and typologize the narrative and rhetorical gestures by which these articles make the Soviet \"Great Patriotic War\" and the post-Soviet \"special military operation\" speak to one another, both prior to and following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The analysis demonstrates that even in contemporary Russia's tightly controlled, propagandistic mass media ecology, politicized uses of memory foster diverse temporal structures within the propaganda narratives. We present a typology of these relations, mapping the distinct modes and intensities of connections between past and present. At one end of the spectrum, we identify a mode of temporal organization that presents past events and figures as fully detached from the present, available solely for historiographic reflection. At the other end, we find narratives that entirely collapse historical distance, addressing contemporary audiences as participants in a timeless war drama, with stakes that transcend any specific historical period. We propose that the presented typology may be applicable beyond our specific case. As a tool for analyzing the hitherto understudied organization of time in politicized articulations of memory, it could be employed in various cultural and political contexts. Furthermore, our approach can serve as a foundation for future research into the actual persuasive and affective impact that specific temporal modalities may have on their target audiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":51368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Sociology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-4446.13171","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper seeks to enhance memory studies' conceptual toolkit by reconsidering established perspectives on "memory politics." The paper theorizes various modes of temporal connectivity cultivated through politicized references to a shared past. Our empirical case is focused on a collection of roughly 5.000 recent articles about the war in Ukraine from major Russian state-aligned news outlets. We analyze and typologize the narrative and rhetorical gestures by which these articles make the Soviet "Great Patriotic War" and the post-Soviet "special military operation" speak to one another, both prior to and following the full-scale invasion of Ukraine. The analysis demonstrates that even in contemporary Russia's tightly controlled, propagandistic mass media ecology, politicized uses of memory foster diverse temporal structures within the propaganda narratives. We present a typology of these relations, mapping the distinct modes and intensities of connections between past and present. At one end of the spectrum, we identify a mode of temporal organization that presents past events and figures as fully detached from the present, available solely for historiographic reflection. At the other end, we find narratives that entirely collapse historical distance, addressing contemporary audiences as participants in a timeless war drama, with stakes that transcend any specific historical period. We propose that the presented typology may be applicable beyond our specific case. As a tool for analyzing the hitherto understudied organization of time in politicized articulations of memory, it could be employed in various cultural and political contexts. Furthermore, our approach can serve as a foundation for future research into the actual persuasive and affective impact that specific temporal modalities may have on their target audiences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
记忆政治的时间性:俄罗斯国家媒体对乌克兰战争的叙述分析。
本文试图通过重新考虑 "记忆政治 "的既定观点,加强记忆研究的概念工具包。本文从理论上探讨了通过对共同过去的政治化引用而形成的各种时空连接模式。我们的实证案例主要集中在俄罗斯主要国家新闻媒体最近发表的约 5000 篇有关乌克兰战争的文章。我们对这些文章在全面入侵乌克兰之前和之后的叙事和修辞姿态进行了分析和类型化,通过这些叙事和修辞姿态,苏联的 "伟大卫国战争 "和后苏联的 "特别军事行动 "得以相互对话。分析表明,即使在当代俄罗斯严格控制的宣传性大众媒体生态中,记忆的政治化使用也会在宣传叙事中形成不同的时间结构。我们提出了这些关系的类型学,描绘了过去与现在之间联系的不同模式和强度。在时间结构的一端,我们确定了一种时间组织模式,这种模式将过去的事件和人物与现在完全割裂开来,仅供历史学反思。在另一端,我们发现叙事完全打破了历史距离,将当代受众视为永恒战争剧的参与者,其利害关系超越了任何特定的历史时期。我们建议,所介绍的类型学可能适用于我们的具体案例之外。在政治化的记忆表述中,作为一种分析迄今为止未被充分研究的时间组织的工具,它可用于各种文化和政治背景。此外,我们的方法还可以作为未来研究的基础,研究特定的时间模式可能对目标受众产生的实际说服力和情感影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
72
期刊介绍: British Journal of Sociology is published on behalf of the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) is unique in the United Kingdom in its concentration on teaching and research across the full range of the social, political and economic sciences. Founded in 1895 by Beatrice and Sidney Webb, the LSE is one of the largest colleges within the University of London and has an outstanding reputation for academic excellence nationally and internationally. Mission Statement: • To be a leading sociology journal in terms of academic substance, scholarly reputation , with relevance to and impact on the social and democratic questions of our times • To publish papers demonstrating the highest standards of scholarship in sociology from authors worldwide; • To carry papers from across the full range of sociological research and knowledge • To lead debate on key methodological and theoretical questions and controversies in contemporary sociology, for example through the annual lecture special issue • To highlight new areas of sociological research, new developments in sociological theory, and new methodological innovations, for example through timely special sections and special issues • To react quickly to major publishing and/or world events by producing special issues and/or sections • To publish the best work from scholars in new and emerging regions where sociology is developing • To encourage new and aspiring sociologists to submit papers to the journal, and to spotlight their work through the early career prize • To engage with the sociological community – academics as well as students – in the UK and abroad, through social media, and a journal blog.
期刊最新文献
The social life of creative methods: Filmmaking, fabulation and recovery. Disruptive diversity: Exploring racial commodification in the Norwegian cultural field. The temporality of memory politics: An analysis of Russian state media narratives on the war in Ukraine. Ida B. Wells-Barnett as an anticolonial theorist on crime and punishment. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1