Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity: single center study on dosing practices and perceived effectiveness.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1159/000543074
Kelly K Storm, Robert B Flint, Wes Onland, Anton H van Kaam, Irwin K M Reiss, G Jeroen Hutten, Sinno H P Simons
{"title":"Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity: single center study on dosing practices and perceived effectiveness.","authors":"Kelly K Storm, Robert B Flint, Wes Onland, Anton H van Kaam, Irwin K M Reiss, G Jeroen Hutten, Sinno H P Simons","doi":"10.1159/000543074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Caffeine is the registered pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity and is extensively used in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to describe the clinical use of caffeine based on real-world data, hypothesizing a divergence from the registered dosing regimen.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis included infants born before 30 weeks of gestation, admitted to the NICU of the Erasmus MC Rotterdam from 2018 to 2021. Exclusion criteria comprised infants admitted after postnatal day 2, those not receiving caffeine during admission, patients admitted for less than 24 hours, those who spent less than 24 hours on non-invasive support, and cases lacking medication data. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving an average caffeine dose higher than registered in the label.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 451 patients with a median gestational age of 28+0 weeks (IQR 26+2-29+0) and birthweight of 1,015 grams (IQR 800-1,218) were included. Of these, 402 infants (89%) received an average daily caffeine dosage exceeding the registered dose range. The median caffeine maintenance dose per patient was 5.3 mg/kg/day (IQR 5.0-5.8), with additional therapy (mini-load, doxapram or intubation) needed in 318 patients (71%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights the frequent use of higher caffeine dosages in clinical practice than registered and recommended based on long-term safety data. Despite these high dosages and frequent mini-loads, 28% of patients still required additional treatment with doxapram and/or invasive mechanical ventilation, indicating the need for individualized dosing strategies or alternative therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Caffeine is the registered pharmacologic treatment for apnea of prematurity and is extensively used in the neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) based on evidence from randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to describe the clinical use of caffeine based on real-world data, hypothesizing a divergence from the registered dosing regimen.

Methods: A retrospective analysis included infants born before 30 weeks of gestation, admitted to the NICU of the Erasmus MC Rotterdam from 2018 to 2021. Exclusion criteria comprised infants admitted after postnatal day 2, those not receiving caffeine during admission, patients admitted for less than 24 hours, those who spent less than 24 hours on non-invasive support, and cases lacking medication data. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients receiving an average caffeine dose higher than registered in the label.

Results: A total of 451 patients with a median gestational age of 28+0 weeks (IQR 26+2-29+0) and birthweight of 1,015 grams (IQR 800-1,218) were included. Of these, 402 infants (89%) received an average daily caffeine dosage exceeding the registered dose range. The median caffeine maintenance dose per patient was 5.3 mg/kg/day (IQR 5.0-5.8), with additional therapy (mini-load, doxapram or intubation) needed in 318 patients (71%).

Conclusion: This study highlights the frequent use of higher caffeine dosages in clinical practice than registered and recommended based on long-term safety data. Despite these high dosages and frequent mini-loads, 28% of patients still required additional treatment with doxapram and/or invasive mechanical ventilation, indicating the need for individualized dosing strategies or alternative therapies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
简介:根据随机对照试验的证据,咖啡因是治疗早产儿呼吸暂停的注册药物,在新生儿重症监护室(NICU)中被广泛使用。本研究旨在根据真实世界的数据描述咖啡因的临床使用情况,并假设其与注册剂量方案存在差异:一项回顾性分析纳入了2018年至2021年期间在鹿特丹伊拉斯姆斯医学院新生儿重症监护室(NICU)住院的妊娠30周前出生的婴儿。排除标准包括产后第 2 天后入院的婴儿、入院期间未接受咖啡因治疗的婴儿、入院时间不足 24 小时的患者、接受无创支持不足 24 小时的患者以及缺乏用药数据的病例。主要结果是接受咖啡因平均剂量高于标签登记剂量的患者比例:共纳入 451 名患者,中位胎龄为 28+0 周(IQR 26+2-29+0),出生体重为 1,015 克(IQR 800-1,218)。其中,402 名婴儿(89%)接受的咖啡因日均剂量超过了注册剂量范围。每位患者咖啡因维持剂量的中位数为 5.3 毫克/千克/天(IQR 5.0-5.8),318 名患者(71%)需要额外治疗(迷你负荷、多沙普胺或插管):本研究强调了临床实践中经常使用的咖啡因剂量高于根据长期安全性数据登记和推荐的剂量。尽管使用了高剂量和频繁的迷你剂量,但仍有 28% 的患者需要额外使用多沙普仑和/或侵入性机械通气治疗,这表明需要采取个性化的剂量策略或替代疗法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxygenation of Immature Infants in the Delivery Room and Beyond. A Quest for Future Research. Caffeine therapy for apnea of prematurity: single center study on dosing practices and perceived effectiveness. Gut Pathogen Colonization: A Risk Factor to Bloodstream Infections in Preterm Neonates Admitted in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit - A Prospective Cohort Study. Growth and cognitive outcome in very preterm infants with postnatal cytomegalovirus infection. Urinary lactate-to-creatinine ratio during the first days of life correlates with the degree of brain damage in premature infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1