Evidence-based advancements in breast cancer genetic counseling: a review.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1007/s12282-024-01660-9
Zahra Batool, Mohammad Amjad Kamal, Bairong Shen
{"title":"Evidence-based advancements in breast cancer genetic counseling: a review.","authors":"Zahra Batool, Mohammad Amjad Kamal, Bairong Shen","doi":"10.1007/s12282-024-01660-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Understanding individuals at high risk of breast cancer, as well as patients and survivors, underscores the critical role of genetic counseling in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The review process was managed using Covidence systematic review software, facilitating data extraction according to predefined eligibility criteria by two independent reviewers. Quality appraisal and narrative synthesis were conducted following data extraction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 1089 articles screened, nineteen (19) studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies were categorized into categories based on their relevance to breast cancer genetic counseling. Rapid Genetic Counseling and Testing (RGCT): 3 studies (15.78%), racial differences: 2 studies (10.52%), limited health literacy: 4 studies (21.05%), breast cancer survivorship: 3 studies (15.78%), risk perceptions and cancer worry: 5 studies (26.31%) and telephone delivery and computer aid programs: 2 studies (10.52%) based on specific focus areas of each study in relation to breast cancer genetic counseling.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Genetic counseling has shown to improve client outcomes across the majority of reviewed studies, contributing to the advancement of evidence-based practice in this field. However, to further promote evidence-based advancements in breast cancer genetic counseling, it is imperative to pay close attention to potential sources of bias and uphold rigorous quality standards in future research endeavors.</p>","PeriodicalId":56083,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01660-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Understanding individuals at high risk of breast cancer, as well as patients and survivors, underscores the critical role of genetic counseling in the diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

Methods: This systematic review adhered to the guidelines outlined in the Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA). The review process was managed using Covidence systematic review software, facilitating data extraction according to predefined eligibility criteria by two independent reviewers. Quality appraisal and narrative synthesis were conducted following data extraction.

Results: Out of 1089 articles screened, nineteen (19) studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. These studies were categorized into categories based on their relevance to breast cancer genetic counseling. Rapid Genetic Counseling and Testing (RGCT): 3 studies (15.78%), racial differences: 2 studies (10.52%), limited health literacy: 4 studies (21.05%), breast cancer survivorship: 3 studies (15.78%), risk perceptions and cancer worry: 5 studies (26.31%) and telephone delivery and computer aid programs: 2 studies (10.52%) based on specific focus areas of each study in relation to breast cancer genetic counseling.

Conclusion: Genetic counseling has shown to improve client outcomes across the majority of reviewed studies, contributing to the advancement of evidence-based practice in this field. However, to further promote evidence-based advancements in breast cancer genetic counseling, it is imperative to pay close attention to potential sources of bias and uphold rigorous quality standards in future research endeavors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
乳腺癌遗传咨询的循证进展:综述。
目的:了解乳腺癌高危人群,以及患者和幸存者,强调遗传咨询在乳腺癌诊断和治疗中的关键作用。方法:本系统评价遵循《系统评价和荟萃分析报告项目》(PRISMA)中概述的指南。审查过程使用covid - 19系统审查软件进行管理,便于两名独立审查人员根据预定义的资格标准提取数据。数据提取后进行质量评价和叙事综合。结果:在筛选的1089篇文章中,19篇研究符合纳入标准,被纳入本综述。这些研究根据其与乳腺癌遗传咨询的相关性被分类。快速遗传咨询和检测(RGCT): 3项研究(15.78%),种族差异:2项研究(10.52%),有限健康素养:4项研究(21.05%),乳腺癌生存:3项研究(15.78%),风险认知和癌症担忧:5项研究(26.31%),电话传递和计算机辅助程序:2项研究(10.52%),基于每项研究与乳腺癌遗传咨询相关的特定重点领域。结论:遗传咨询已显示出改善客户的结果在大多数审查的研究,有助于在该领域的循证实践的进步。然而,为了进一步促进乳腺癌遗传咨询的循证进展,必须密切关注潜在的偏见来源,并在未来的研究工作中坚持严格的质量标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Cancer
Breast Cancer ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Breast Cancer, the official journal of the Japanese Breast Cancer Society, publishes articles that contribute to progress in the field, in basic or translational research and also in clinical research, seeking to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all who are concerned with breast cancer. The journal welcomes all original articles describing clinical and epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations regarding breast cancer and related diseases. The journal will consider five types of articles: editorials, review articles, original articles, case reports, and rapid communications. Although editorials and review articles will principally be solicited by the editors, they can also be submitted for peer review, as in the case of original articles. The journal provides the best of up-to-date information on breast cancer, presenting readers with high-impact, original work focusing on pivotal issues.
期刊最新文献
A prospective cohort study of abemaciclib-induced interstitial lung disease in metastatic breast cancer after chemotherapy. Breast cancer screening rates and influencing factors among LGBTQ groups in Japan. Breast cancer statistics for Japan in 2022: annual report of the national clinical database-breast cancer registry-clinical implications including chemosensitivity of breast cancer with low estrogen receptor expression. Long-term local control and cosmesis of perioperative interstitial brachytherapy for partial breast irradiation following breast-conserving surgery. The impact of breast surgery and systemic therapy on the survival of patients with de novo stage IV breast cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1