Breast Cancer最新文献

Background: In invasive breast cancer, there are no differences among the mid- and long-term oncological safety results of nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), skin-sparing mastectomy (SSM), and simple mastectomy (SM). There are several reports comparing NSM and SSM with SM in the context of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS); however, the eligibility criteria vary among institutions, and there are no reports that compare all three surgical methods simultaneously within the same institution. This study aimed to compare the local recurrence and survival rates of the three techniques (NSM, SSM, and SM) in Japanese patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS.

Methods: Patients undergoing NSM, SSM, or SM at our institution between 2006 and 2015 were identified, and their outcomes were analyzed.

Results: The mean follow-up period was 80.4 months (standard deviation [SD]: 37.1 months). NSM was performed in 152 cases, SSM in 49, and SM in 44. Five of 245 patients developed local recurrences. Four of these patients had invasive cancer. The primary endpoints of 5-year cumulative local recurrence were 2.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-5.0) for NSM, 2.2% (95% CI: 0.0-6.3) for SSM, and 0% (95% CI: 0.0-0.0) for SM. There were no significant differences among the 5-year local recurrence rates.

Conclusions: In this single-center, retrospective study, the oncological safety of SSM and NSM for DCIS was comparable to that of conventional SM.

Background: Data on the desire for pregnancy and the status of fertility preservation (FP) in patients with breast cancer remain unclear. This study aimed to determine the status of patients with breast cancer who desired pregnancy and FP implementation before systemic therapy.

Methods: This retrospective study surveyed the institutional clinical databases and electronic medical records of patients aged < 43 years with stages 0-III primary breast cancer during surgery and treated between April 2020 and March 2021. All patients were enquired about their desire for pregnancy in a questionnaire by "present," "absent," and "unsure" at their first visit. The correlation between the desire for pregnancy, implementation of FP, and clinicopathological factors was investigated.

Results: Among 1005 patients who underwent surgery for primary breast cancer, 146 were included in the analysis. Of them, 34 (23.3%) patients had a desire for pregnancy, and 45 (30.8%) chose "unsure." Factors associated with the desire for pregnancy were younger age during surgery (p < 0.0022), unmarried status (p < 0.001), nulliparity (p < 0.001), early-stage disease (p = 0.0016), and estrogen receptor positivity (p = 0.008). Among 115 patients who underwent systemic therapy, 13 (11.3%) underwent FP before systemic therapy. Patients who were nulliparous frequently pursued FP (p = 0.0195). The proportion of FP implementation was low in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.0863).

Conclusions: Our study suggests that unmarried, nulliparous, and younger patients were more interested in pregnancy, and nulliparous patients frequently pursued FP.

Purpose: The study focuses on enhancing breast cancer (BC) prognosis through early detection, aiming to establish a non-invasive, clinically viable BC screening method using specific serum miRNA levels.

Methods: Involving 11,349 participants across BC, 11 other cancer types, and control groups, the study identified serum biomarkers through feature selection and developed two BC screening models using six machine learning algorithms. These models underwent evaluation across test, internal, and external validation sets, assessing performance metrics like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under the curve (AUC). Subgroup analysis was conducted to test model stability.

Results: Based on the three serum miRNA biomarkers (miR-1307-3p, miR-5100, and miR-4745-5p), a BC screening model, SM4BC3miR model, was developed. This model achieved AUC performances of 0.986, 0.986, and 0.939 on the test, internal, and external sets, respectively. Furthermore, the SSM4BC model, utilizing ratio scores of miR-1307-3p/miR-5100 and miR-4745-5p/miR-5100, showed AUCs of 0.973, 0.980, and 0.953, respectively. Subgroup analyses underscored both models' robustness and stability.

Conclusion: This research introduced the SM4BC3miR and SSM4BC models, leveraging three specific serum miRNA biomarkers for breast cancer screening. Demonstrating high accuracy and stability, these models present a promising approach for early detection of breast cancer. However, their practical application and effectiveness in clinical settings remain to be further validated.

Purpose: To assess the predictive value of the 21-gene recurrence score (RS) on the survival outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in elderly patients with T1N0 luminal breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery.

Methods: We retrospectively included patients aged ≥ 70 years and diagnosed with T1N0 luminal BC between 2004 and 2015 using the data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results. The RS groups were categorized using the TAILORx criteria as follows: low risk (RS < 11) (LR), intermediate risk (RS 11-25) (IR), and high risk (RS > 25) (HR). Kaplan-Meier analysis, propensity score matching (PSM), and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used for statistical analysis.

Results: We included 5901 patients in the analysis. Of the patients, 4492 (76.1%) underwent PORT, while 1409 (23.9%) did not receive PORT. There were 1588 (26.9%), 3613 (61.2%), and 700 (12.0%) patients classified as LR, IR, and HR, respectively. There were 1182 (74.4%), 2773 (76.8%), and 537 (76.7%) patients in the LR, IR, and HR groups receiving PORT, respectively (P = 0.182). A total of 1353 pairs of patients were completely matched using PSM. PORT was independently associated with better overall survival (OS) (P < 0.001) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) (P = 0.015) in the entire cohort. The sensitivity analyses showed that the receipt of PORT was not associated with OS (P = 0.887) and BCSS (P = 0.861) in the LR group. However, the receipt of PORT was associated with OS (P < 0.001) and BCSS in the IRHR group (P = 0.026).

Conclusion: Our study highlights the possible role of the 21-gene RS in predicting the survival outcomes of PORT following BCS in elderly patients with T1N0 luminal breast cancer.

Background: Targeted treatment of different types of cancers through highly expressed cancer cell surface receptors by fusion proteins is an efficient method for cancer therapy. The HER2 receptor is a member of the tyrosine kinase receptors family, which plays a notable role in breast cancer tumor development. About 25-30% of breast cancers overexpress human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

Methods: In this study, we evaluated the particulars of a designed recombinant protein formed by HER2-specific Mab Herceptin linked with Arazyme on a HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cell line (SKBR3). Arazyme, a metalloprotease produced by Serratia proteamaculans was fused to the variable area of light and heavy chains of the Herceptin. The cytotoxic assay of the Arazyme-linker-Herceptin in the SKBR3 and MDA-MB-468 cells was evaluated by the MTT and flow cytometry techniques. The Caspase‑3 activity determination and adhesion assay were performed to evaluate the antitumor activity of the Arazyme-linker-Herceptin against SKBR3 cells. Furthermore, RT-PCR was used to measure the expression levels of the Bcl-2, Bax, MMP2, MMP9, and RIP3 genes.

Results: The Arazyme-linker-Herceptin showed higher cytotoxicity in SKBR3 cells compared to MDA-MB-468 cells. In addition, flow cytometry results revealed that the Arazyme-linker-Herceptin can significantly induce apoptosis in the HER2-overexpressing breast cancer cell line (SKBR3), which was confirmed by Bax upregulation and the decrease in adhesion of tumor cells and MMP2/MMP9.

Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrated that the Arazyme-linker-Herceptin induced apoptosis and decreased metastatic genes in SKBR3 cells; however, further research is required to confirm the effectiveness of the fusion protein.

Background: HER2-low populations constitute a heterogeneous group, and the cytotoxic anticancer agent efficacy based on HER2 status remains unclear. This study evaluated the clinicopathological features and outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer showing HER2-low expression treated with eribulin or capecitabine, two treatment options after anthracycline and taxane treatment.

Methods: We retrospectively evaluated patients who were treated with eribulin or capecitabine between 2011 and 2015. HER2 status was evaluated according to the ASCO/CAP guidelines.

Results: No significant difference was observed in overall survival (OS; eribulin: hazard ratio [HR], 0.66; 95% CI 0.40-1.10; capecitabine: HR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.45-1.30) or progression-free survival (PFS; eribulin: HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.72-1.78; capecitabine: HR, 0.90; 95% CI 0.56-1.44) between patients receiving eribulin (HER2-null: 35, HER2-low: 44) and those receiving capecitabine (HER2-null: 41, HER2-low: 33). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in OS between the two groups in the hormone-positive and -negative populations for eribulin and capecitabine. HER2-null and HER2-low patients showed objective response rates (ORRs) of 22.5% and 9.1% (p = 0.09) overall, and 32.0% and 10.5% (p = 0.03), respectively, in hormone-positive cases among eribulin-treated patients. No response was observed in hormone-negative patients. Capecitabine treatment in HER2-null and HER2-low patients had overall ORRs of 26.8% and 15.2% (p = 0.23), respectively, with 27.3% and 16.1% (p = 0.28) for hormone-positive cases; and 25.0% and 0% (p = 1.0), respectively, for hormone-negative cases.

Conclusions: Eribulin and capecitabine sensitivity may vary based on HER2 expression in patients with HER2-low and HER2-null breast cancer. Prognosis was similar between the HER2-low and the HER2-null groups.

Background: In patients with early-stage breast cancer following breast surgery, ultra-hypofractionated (UHF) breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) has been shown to be non-inferior to a moderate-hypofractionated (MHF) regimen, with a minimal risk of breast induration, in the FAST-Forward trial, and UHF is now becoming the standard regimen in Europe. Herein, we aimed to investigate Japanese patients' attitudes toward the UHF regimen.

Methods: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted at 13 RT centers in nine prefectures across Japan. All patients underwent breast-conserving surgery, followed by either conventional fractionation (2 Gy/fr) or MHF (2.66 Gy/fr) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) with or without a tumor bed boost. The questionnaire consisted of 13 questions mainly addressing quality-of-life during RT. Key questions included an 11-point scale (0-10) for rating the patients' enthusiasm for the UHF regimen and prioritization of the following treatment-related effects: treatment efficacy, acute/late adverse effects, physical/emotional/financial burden, and breast cosmesis. The patient and treatment characteristics were assessed by a physician.

Results: In total, 247 questionnaires were administered between November 2022 and June 2023. The age distribution was as follows: < 50:50 s:60 s: ≥ 70 = 59 (24%):76 (30%):63 (26%):49 (20%). Sixty-nine percent of patients rated their enthusiasm for the UHF regimen at ≥ 6 out of 10 points (45% rated 10/10). Treatment efficacy was the highest priority for most patients (89%), whereas breast cosmesis the lowest priority (53%).

Conclusions: Patients' enthusiasm for UHF-WBI was observed across the cohort. These results could motivate researchers and clinicians to introduce UHF regimens in clinical practice.

Objective: This study analyzes the development, benefits, trial evidence, and price of new breast cancer drugs with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

Methods: We identified 26 drugs with 42 FDA-approved indications for early and metastatic breast cancer (2000-2023). Data were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) and tumor response's relative risk (RR) alongside objective response rate (ORR) were meta-analyzed.

Results: The median development time for breast cancer drugs was 7.8 years (95% CI 6.2-10.8). 26% of treatments were considered innovative ("first-in-indication") with 88% acting via a targeted mechanism. 64% were small molecules, 19% antibodies, and 18% antibody-drug conjugates. 38% were approved for HR + and 31% for HER2 + breast cancer. 6 indications were for early and 36 for metastatic breast cancer. Indications utilized FDA's special programs: orphan (2%), fast track (24%), accelerated approval (19%), priority review (74%), breakthrough therapy (44%). Approval was predominantly supported by phase 3 trials (88%) of randomized controlled design (66%), enrolling a median of 585 patients (IQR 417-752) at 181 centers (IQR 142-223) across 19 countries (IQR 17-20). New drugs' HR were 0.78 for OS (95% CI 0.74-0.82) and 0.59 for PFS (95% CI 0.54-0.64) with a RR for tumor response of 1.61 (95% CI 1.46-1.76). Median improvements of OS were 2.8 months (IQR 1.8-5.8) and PFS were 4.4 months (IQR 2.2-7.1). In single-arm trials, the average ORR was 31% (95% CI 10-53). In meta-regressions, the correlation between OS/PFS was 0.34 (p = 0.031) and OS/response was 0.01 (p = 0.435). 60% of treatments had a 'high-value' ESMO-MCBS score with 14% demonstrating improvements in quality of life. The median price was $16,013 per month (95% CI 13,097-17,617). There was no association between prices and patient benefit. The median value per life year gained was $62,419 (IQR 25,840-86,062).

Conclusions: Over the past two decades, the development of innovative and effective drugs transformed the treatment landscape for breast cancer patients. Yet, investigators and regulators must safeguard that highly-priced new drugs demonstrate improvements in patient-centered clinical endpoints: overall survival and quality of life.

We provide updated results (median follow-up duration: 20.4 months) of a retrospective study on the effectiveness of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer with brain metastases (BM) and/or leptomeningeal disease (ROSET-BM). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months. Median overall survival (OS) was not reached (NR); 24-month OS rate was 56.0%. Subgroup analysis showed that median PFS was 13.2 months in patients with analytical active BM, 17.5 months in patients with leptomeningeal carcinomatosis (LMC), and NR in patients with analytical stable BM (24-month PFS rates in patients with analytical active BM, LMC, and analytical stable BM were 32.7%, 25.1%, and 60.8%, respectively). Median OS was 27.0 months in patients with analytical active BM and NR in patients with LMC or analytical stable BM (24-month OS rates in patients with analytical active BM, LMC, and analytical stable BM were 52.0%, 61.6%, and 71.6%, respectively). The most common adverse event leading to discontinuation of T-DXd was interstitial lung disease (ILD; 23.1%); median ILD onset time among patients who discontinued T-DXd treatment due to ILD was 5.3 months. T-DXd has promising effectiveness in heavily pre-treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients with BM and LMC. The incidence and median onset time of ILD were similar to those of Japanese subgroups in previous studies.