Improving perinatal depression screening uptake: The impact of Medicaid reimbursement policy in Massachusetts.

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Services Research Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/1475-6773.14420
Chanup Jeung, Laura B Attanasio, Kimberley H Geissler
{"title":"Improving perinatal depression screening uptake: The impact of Medicaid reimbursement policy in Massachusetts.","authors":"Chanup Jeung, Laura B Attanasio, Kimberley H Geissler","doi":"10.1111/1475-6773.14420","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the impact of the Massachusetts Medicaid program's reimbursement policy change for perinatal depression screening on utilization rates.</p><p><strong>Study setting and design: </strong>This study employed a difference-in-differences design to compare insurance-paid prenatal and postpartum depression screening rates as well as postpartum antidepressant receipt rates between Medicaid and privately insured individuals before and after policy implementation in May 2016.</p><p><strong>Data sources and analytic sample: </strong>Data are from the 2014-2020 Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study included individuals with a live birth from October 10, 2014, to December 31, 2019, who were continuously insured either by Medicaid or private insurance.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>Among 141,085 births, 42.6% were covered by Medicaid. Among those with Medicaid, 1.9% had a paid postpartum depression screening prior to the policy and 16.9% after (1.5% vs. 12.3% for prenatal screening); among privately insured, 3.8% had a paid postpartum screening prior to the policy and 10.6% after (0.9% vs. 6.7% for prenatal screening). Antidepressant receipt rose from 6.9% to 8.3% among Medicaid enrollees and from 3.3% to 4.9% among privately insured individuals after the policy. After regression adjustment, implementation of the Massachusetts Medicaid reimbursement policy was positively associated with perinatal depression screening rates with a differential increase of 10.0 percentage points (p < 0.001) for postpartum screening and 3.5 percentage points (p < 0.001) for prenatal screening among Medicaid enrollees versus privately insured. Despite increased depression screening, the policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in antidepressant receipt among Medicaid enrollees compared to privately insured individuals.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Separate payment for perinatal depression screening significantly improved screening rates among Medicaid beneficiaries, highlighting Medicaid's critical role in identifying mental health needs for vulnerable populations. However, the persistence of sub-optimal screening rates among perinatal individuals underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure universal screening and effective treatment for perinatal depression.</p>","PeriodicalId":55065,"journal":{"name":"Health Services Research","volume":" ","pages":"e14420"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.14420","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the impact of the Massachusetts Medicaid program's reimbursement policy change for perinatal depression screening on utilization rates.

Study setting and design: This study employed a difference-in-differences design to compare insurance-paid prenatal and postpartum depression screening rates as well as postpartum antidepressant receipt rates between Medicaid and privately insured individuals before and after policy implementation in May 2016.

Data sources and analytic sample: Data are from the 2014-2020 Massachusetts All-Payer Claims Database. The study included individuals with a live birth from October 10, 2014, to December 31, 2019, who were continuously insured either by Medicaid or private insurance.

Principal findings: Among 141,085 births, 42.6% were covered by Medicaid. Among those with Medicaid, 1.9% had a paid postpartum depression screening prior to the policy and 16.9% after (1.5% vs. 12.3% for prenatal screening); among privately insured, 3.8% had a paid postpartum screening prior to the policy and 10.6% after (0.9% vs. 6.7% for prenatal screening). Antidepressant receipt rose from 6.9% to 8.3% among Medicaid enrollees and from 3.3% to 4.9% among privately insured individuals after the policy. After regression adjustment, implementation of the Massachusetts Medicaid reimbursement policy was positively associated with perinatal depression screening rates with a differential increase of 10.0 percentage points (p < 0.001) for postpartum screening and 3.5 percentage points (p < 0.001) for prenatal screening among Medicaid enrollees versus privately insured. Despite increased depression screening, the policy was not associated with a statistically significant change in antidepressant receipt among Medicaid enrollees compared to privately insured individuals.

Conclusions: Separate payment for perinatal depression screening significantly improved screening rates among Medicaid beneficiaries, highlighting Medicaid's critical role in identifying mental health needs for vulnerable populations. However, the persistence of sub-optimal screening rates among perinatal individuals underscores the need for a comprehensive approach to ensure universal screening and effective treatment for perinatal depression.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高围产期抑郁症筛查率:马萨诸塞州医疗补助报销政策的影响。
目的:评估马萨诸塞州医疗补助计划围产期抑郁症筛查报销政策的变化对使用率的影响:评估马萨诸塞州医疗补助计划围产期抑郁症筛查报销政策变化对使用率的影响:本研究采用差异设计,比较 2016 年 5 月政策实施前后,医疗补助计划和私人投保者的保险支付产前和产后抑郁症筛查率以及产后抗抑郁药服用率:数据来自 2014-2020 年马萨诸塞州所有纳税人索赔数据库。研究对象包括 2014 年 10 月 10 日至 2019 年 12 月 31 日期间出生的活产婴儿,这些婴儿连续参加了医疗补助计划或私人保险:在 141 085 名新生儿中,42.6% 由医疗补助计划承保。在享受医疗补助的产妇中,1.9%的产妇在政策实施前接受过付费产后抑郁筛查,16.9%的产妇在政策实施后接受过付费产后抑郁筛查(产前筛查为 1.5%,私人保险为 12.3%);在私人保险产妇中,3.8%的产妇在政策实施前接受过付费产后抑郁筛查,10.6%的产妇在政策实施后接受过付费产后抑郁筛查(产前筛查为 0.9%,私人保险为 6.7%)。政策实施后,医疗补助参保者中接受抗抑郁药物治疗的比例从 6.9% 上升到 8.3%,私人投保者中接受抗抑郁药物治疗的比例从 3.3% 上升到 4.9%。经过回归调整后,马萨诸塞州医疗补助报销政策的实施与围产期抑郁症筛查率呈正相关,差值增加了 10.0 个百分点(p 结论:马萨诸塞州医疗补助报销政策的实施与围产期抑郁症筛查率呈正相关,差值增加了 10.0 个百分点:围产期抑郁症筛查的单独支付显著提高了医疗补助受益人的筛查率,凸显了医疗补助在识别弱势群体心理健康需求方面的关键作用。然而,围产期患者的筛查率仍未达到最佳水平,这凸显了采取综合方法确保普遍筛查和有效治疗围产期抑郁症的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Services Research
Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
193
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Services Research (HSR) is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal that provides researchers and public and private policymakers with the latest research findings, methods, and concepts related to the financing, organization, delivery, evaluation, and outcomes of health services. Rated as one of the top journals in the fields of health policy and services and health care administration, HSR publishes outstanding articles reporting the findings of original investigations that expand knowledge and understanding of the wide-ranging field of health care and that will help to improve the health of individuals and communities.
期刊最新文献
Transporting difference-in-differences estimates to assess health equity impacts of payment and delivery models. Improving perinatal depression screening uptake: The impact of Medicaid reimbursement policy in Massachusetts. Sustainability of California's Whole Person Care pilots integrating medical and social services for Medicaid enrollees via newly developed Medicaid benefits. Telehealth and disparities in opioid use disorder treatment: Medicaid enrollees versus privately insured individuals. Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1