IL-1R2 Expression in Tfr Cells Controls Allergic Anaphylaxis by Regulating IgG Versus IgE Responses

IF 12 1区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Allergy Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1111/all.16437
Paul Engeroff, Aude Belbezier, Romain Vaineau, Gwladys Fourcade, Hugo D. Lujan, Bertrand Bellier, Stephanie Graff-Dubois, David Klatzmann
{"title":"IL-1R2 Expression in Tfr Cells Controls Allergic Anaphylaxis by Regulating IgG Versus IgE Responses","authors":"Paul Engeroff,&nbsp;Aude Belbezier,&nbsp;Romain Vaineau,&nbsp;Gwladys Fourcade,&nbsp;Hugo D. Lujan,&nbsp;Bertrand Bellier,&nbsp;Stephanie Graff-Dubois,&nbsp;David Klatzmann","doi":"10.1111/all.16437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The antibody response is regulated by follicular T helper (Tfh) and regulatory (Tfr) cells that control the germinal center (GC) reaction [<span>1</span>]. We previously showed that Tfh cells express the IL-1 receptor IL-1R1, while Tfr cells express the IL-1 decoy receptor IL-1R2 and IL-1R1. In contrast, regulatory T cells (Tregs) largely do not express IL-1Rs [<span>2</span>]. The role of IL-1Rs expressed in follicular T cells in the regulation of allergy is poorly understood. We recently generated a mouse line in which IL-1R2 is knocked out in FoxP3<sup>+</sup> T cells (FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice) [<span>3</span>].</p><p>Here, we compared these mice to their FoxP3<sup>cre</sup> controls in a model of ovalbumin (OVA) sensitization and anaphylaxis. Compared to control mice, FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice displayed a strong exacerbation of allergic anaphylaxis characterized by increased total IgE levels, increased blood basophil-displayed surface IgE density, and significantly enhanced systemic anaphylaxis in response to OVA challenge (Figure 1A–D, Figure S1A–D). Moreover, in vitro OVA-challenged basophils derived from FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice showed increased degranulation compared to controls, demonstrating an increase in reactive IgE (Figure 1E–G, Figure S1F).</p><p>In contrast to this enhanced IgE response, FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice generated significantly reduced OVA-specific IgG responses, including IgG1 and IgG2b subclasses (Figure 1H–J). Blockade of the inhibitory IgG receptor FcγRIIb worsened anaphylaxis in control mice but had no effect in FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup>, suggesting that no IgG-dependent protection occurs (Figure 1 K). In vitro, only serum from control mice but not serum from FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> enhanced FcγR-dependent binding of IgG-OVA complexes to basophils and inhibited basophil degranulation via FcγRIIb (Figure 1L,M, Figure S1G,H). Thus, allergic anaphylaxis in FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice is driven by an increase in reactive IgE and a reduction in protective IgG.</p><p>We next investigated the splenic GC response. FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice displayed overall elevated Tfh cell numbers, including IL-4<sup>+</sup>Tfh cells. However, Tfr cells increased even more, resulting in elevated Tfr:Tfh ratios (Figure 2A–C, Figure S3). Looking at B-cell subsets, we noted an increase in plasmablasts (PB), whereas GC Bcell (GCB) numbers were not increased (Figure 2D). Interestingly, GCB displayed reduced levels of proliferation and apoptosis, suggesting overall reduced activity (Figure 2E,F, Figure S3). In line with this notion, GCB from FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> mice showed reduced OVA binding (Figure 2G).</p><p>Finally, isolated splenocytes were re-stimulated with IL-1β and/or OVA. We observed an IL-1R1-dependent activation and proliferation of IL-1R2-deleted Tfr cells, whereas B-cell proliferation upon re-stimulation did not occur in FoxP3<sup>cre</sup>IL-1R2<sup>lox</sup> splenocytes (Figure 2H–K, Figure S4). These results extend our previous report showing that IL-1R2 deletion in Tfr cells enhances their own activation [<span>3</span>]. In agreement with our findings that Tregs do not express IL-1Rs, those cells did not proliferate in response to IL-1 re-stimulation (Figure S4K) [<span>2</span>].</p><p>A recent study showed that deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells enhances cellular GC responses and antibodies upon immunization through increasing IL-1 levels [<span>4</span>]. In line with this study, we observe increased follicular T cell numbers upon OVA immunization. However, those only translated to enhanced total IgE responses whereas OVA-specific IgG responses were supressed. These differences could be explained by the here-observed increases in Tfr:Tfh ratios and the different immunization approach. Future studies will resolve this in further detail.</p><p>We propose a model in which deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells enhances their own IL-1R1-dependent expansion, resulting in elevated Tfr:Tfh ratios, which may suppress maturation of GCs favoring OVA-specific IgG responses. In contrast, GC quality is sufficient to raise total and even specific IgE responses, potentially enhanced by increases in IL-4<sup>+</sup>Tfh cells. Thus, the deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells leads to a reduction in IgG:IgE ratios which drives the response toward allergic anaphylaxis (Figure 2L).</p><p>Our findings are supported by the fact that the IgE response arises through a distinct pathway from IgG, that can occur independent of GCs. IgE switching and PB formation may occur directly from IgM, or post-GC by switching from IgG precursors [<span>5, 6</span>]. Our findings could fit both scenarios, even though the latter would require that sufficient IgG precursors are initially generated during sensitization. Overall, these questions are difficult to answer as long as the details of the IgE response itself remain unclear.</p><p>In summary, we show that the level of IL-1R2 expression in Tfr cells may regulate between IgG versus IgE pathways for the GC response, thus controlling allergic anaphylaxis.</p><p>D.K. conceptualized and supervised the study. Methodologies were developed by P.E., A.B., G.F., H.D.L., B.B., S.G.D., and D.K. Experiments were conducted by P.E., A.B., R.V., and G.F. Visualization was handled by P.E. Funding was acquired by P.E. and D.K. The original draft was written by P.E., and edited by B.B., S.G.D., and D.K., before a final review by all authors.</p><p>The authors declare no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":122,"journal":{"name":"Allergy","volume":"80 9","pages":"2636-2639"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/all.16437","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/all.16437","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The antibody response is regulated by follicular T helper (Tfh) and regulatory (Tfr) cells that control the germinal center (GC) reaction [1]. We previously showed that Tfh cells express the IL-1 receptor IL-1R1, while Tfr cells express the IL-1 decoy receptor IL-1R2 and IL-1R1. In contrast, regulatory T cells (Tregs) largely do not express IL-1Rs [2]. The role of IL-1Rs expressed in follicular T cells in the regulation of allergy is poorly understood. We recently generated a mouse line in which IL-1R2 is knocked out in FoxP3+ T cells (FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice) [3].

Here, we compared these mice to their FoxP3cre controls in a model of ovalbumin (OVA) sensitization and anaphylaxis. Compared to control mice, FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice displayed a strong exacerbation of allergic anaphylaxis characterized by increased total IgE levels, increased blood basophil-displayed surface IgE density, and significantly enhanced systemic anaphylaxis in response to OVA challenge (Figure 1A–D, Figure S1A–D). Moreover, in vitro OVA-challenged basophils derived from FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice showed increased degranulation compared to controls, demonstrating an increase in reactive IgE (Figure 1E–G, Figure S1F).

In contrast to this enhanced IgE response, FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice generated significantly reduced OVA-specific IgG responses, including IgG1 and IgG2b subclasses (Figure 1H–J). Blockade of the inhibitory IgG receptor FcγRIIb worsened anaphylaxis in control mice but had no effect in FoxP3creIL-1R2lox, suggesting that no IgG-dependent protection occurs (Figure 1 K). In vitro, only serum from control mice but not serum from FoxP3creIL-1R2lox enhanced FcγR-dependent binding of IgG-OVA complexes to basophils and inhibited basophil degranulation via FcγRIIb (Figure 1L,M, Figure S1G,H). Thus, allergic anaphylaxis in FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice is driven by an increase in reactive IgE and a reduction in protective IgG.

We next investigated the splenic GC response. FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice displayed overall elevated Tfh cell numbers, including IL-4+Tfh cells. However, Tfr cells increased even more, resulting in elevated Tfr:Tfh ratios (Figure 2A–C, Figure S3). Looking at B-cell subsets, we noted an increase in plasmablasts (PB), whereas GC Bcell (GCB) numbers were not increased (Figure 2D). Interestingly, GCB displayed reduced levels of proliferation and apoptosis, suggesting overall reduced activity (Figure 2E,F, Figure S3). In line with this notion, GCB from FoxP3creIL-1R2lox mice showed reduced OVA binding (Figure 2G).

Finally, isolated splenocytes were re-stimulated with IL-1β and/or OVA. We observed an IL-1R1-dependent activation and proliferation of IL-1R2-deleted Tfr cells, whereas B-cell proliferation upon re-stimulation did not occur in FoxP3creIL-1R2lox splenocytes (Figure 2H–K, Figure S4). These results extend our previous report showing that IL-1R2 deletion in Tfr cells enhances their own activation [3]. In agreement with our findings that Tregs do not express IL-1Rs, those cells did not proliferate in response to IL-1 re-stimulation (Figure S4K) [2].

A recent study showed that deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells enhances cellular GC responses and antibodies upon immunization through increasing IL-1 levels [4]. In line with this study, we observe increased follicular T cell numbers upon OVA immunization. However, those only translated to enhanced total IgE responses whereas OVA-specific IgG responses were supressed. These differences could be explained by the here-observed increases in Tfr:Tfh ratios and the different immunization approach. Future studies will resolve this in further detail.

We propose a model in which deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells enhances their own IL-1R1-dependent expansion, resulting in elevated Tfr:Tfh ratios, which may suppress maturation of GCs favoring OVA-specific IgG responses. In contrast, GC quality is sufficient to raise total and even specific IgE responses, potentially enhanced by increases in IL-4+Tfh cells. Thus, the deletion of IL-1R2 in Tfr cells leads to a reduction in IgG:IgE ratios which drives the response toward allergic anaphylaxis (Figure 2L).

Our findings are supported by the fact that the IgE response arises through a distinct pathway from IgG, that can occur independent of GCs. IgE switching and PB formation may occur directly from IgM, or post-GC by switching from IgG precursors [5, 6]. Our findings could fit both scenarios, even though the latter would require that sufficient IgG precursors are initially generated during sensitization. Overall, these questions are difficult to answer as long as the details of the IgE response itself remain unclear.

In summary, we show that the level of IL-1R2 expression in Tfr cells may regulate between IgG versus IgE pathways for the GC response, thus controlling allergic anaphylaxis.

D.K. conceptualized and supervised the study. Methodologies were developed by P.E., A.B., G.F., H.D.L., B.B., S.G.D., and D.K. Experiments were conducted by P.E., A.B., R.V., and G.F. Visualization was handled by P.E. Funding was acquired by P.E. and D.K. The original draft was written by P.E., and edited by B.B., S.G.D., and D.K., before a final review by all authors.

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Tfr 细胞中 IL-1R2 的表达通过调节 IgG 与 IgE 反应控制过敏性过敏反应
抗体反应由滤泡T辅助细胞(Tfh)和调节细胞(Tfr)控制生发中心(GC)反应[1]。我们之前发现Tfh细胞表达IL-1受体IL-1R1,而Tfr细胞表达IL-1诱骗受体IL-1R2和IL-1R1。相反,调节性T细胞(Tregs)在很大程度上不表达IL-1Rs。在滤泡T细胞中表达的IL-1Rs在过敏调节中的作用尚不清楚。我们最近生成了FoxP3+ T细胞中IL-1R2被敲除的小鼠品系(FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠)[3]。在这里,我们将这些小鼠与FoxP3cre对照组进行了卵清蛋白(OVA)致敏和过敏反应模型的比较。与对照组小鼠相比,FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠表现出强烈的过敏性反应加重,其特征是总IgE水平升高,血液嗜碱性细胞显示的表面IgE密度升高,并且在对OVA攻击的反应中显着增强了全身过敏反应(图1A-D,图1A-D)。此外,来自FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠的体外ova激发的嗜碱性粒细胞与对照组相比,脱颗粒增加,表明反应性IgE增加(图1E-G,图S1F)。与这种增强的IgE应答相反,FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠产生的ova特异性IgG应答显著降低,包括IgG1和IgG2b亚类(图1H-J)。抑制IgG受体FcγRIIb使对照小鼠的过敏反应恶化,但对FoxP3creIL-1R2lox没有影响,表明没有IgG依赖性保护发生(图1k)。在体外,只有对照小鼠的血清而不是FoxP3creIL-1R2lox的血清增强了fc γ r依赖性的IgG-OVA复合物与嗜碱性细胞的结合,并通过FcγRIIb抑制了嗜碱性细胞的脱粒(图1L,M,图S1G,H)。因此,FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠的过敏性过敏反应是由反应性IgE增加和保护性IgG减少驱动的。接下来我们研究了脾GC反应。FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠显示整体Tfh细胞数量升高,包括IL-4+Tfh细胞。然而,Tfr细胞增加更多,导致Tfr:Tfh比率升高(图2A-C,图S3)。观察b细胞亚群,我们注意到浆母细胞(PB)增加,而GC b细胞(GCB)数量没有增加(图2D)。有趣的是,GCB的增殖和凋亡水平降低,表明整体活性降低(图2E,F,图S3)。与此概念一致,FoxP3creIL-1R2lox小鼠的GCB显示出降低的OVA结合(图2G)。最后,用IL-1β和/或卵细胞再刺激分离的脾细胞。我们观察到il - 1r1依赖性激活和il - 1r2缺失的Tfr细胞的增殖,而FoxP3creIL-1R2lox脾细胞在再刺激后没有发生b细胞增殖(图2H-K,图S4)。这些结果扩展了我们之前的报道,即Tfr细胞中IL-1R2的缺失增强了它们自身的激活[3]。与我们的研究结果一致,Tregs不表达IL-1Rs,这些细胞在IL-1再刺激下没有增殖(图S4K)[2]。最近的一项研究表明,Tfr细胞中IL-1R2的缺失通过增加IL-1水平来增强免疫时细胞GC反应和抗体。与本研究一致,我们观察到卵泡免疫后卵泡T细胞数量增加。然而,这些仅转化为增强的总IgE反应,而ova特异性IgG反应被抑制。这些差异可以通过观察到的Tfr:Tfh比率的增加和不同的免疫方法来解释。未来的研究将进一步解决这个问题。我们提出了一个模型,在该模型中,Tfr细胞中IL-1R2的缺失增强了它们自身il - 1r1依赖的扩增,导致Tfr:Tfh比率升高,这可能抑制GCs的成熟,有利于ova特异性IgG反应。相反,GC质量足以提高总IgE甚至特异性IgE反应,可能通过IL-4+Tfh细胞的增加而增强。因此,Tfr细胞中IL-1R2的缺失导致IgG:IgE比率的降低,从而导致过敏反应(图2L)。我们的发现得到了以下事实的支持:IgE反应是通过与IgG不同的途径产生的,可以独立于GCs发生。IgE转换和PB形成可能直接来自IgM,也可能在gc后由IgG前体转换而来[5,6]。我们的发现可能适合这两种情况,尽管后者需要在致敏过程中最初产生足够的IgG前体。总的来说,只要IgE反应本身的细节仍然不清楚,这些问题就很难回答。总之,我们发现Tfr细胞中IL-1R2的表达水平可能调节GC反应的IgG和IgE途径,从而控制过敏性过敏。概念化和监督研究。方法由p.e.、a.b.、g.f.、H.D.L、b.b.、S.G.D和D.K.提出。实验由p.e.、a.b.、R.V.进行 , G.F. Visualization由P.E.负责。P.E.和D.K.获得资金。初稿由P.E.撰写,b.b.、s.g.d.和D.K.编辑,最后由所有作者进行最终审核。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Allergy
Allergy 医学-过敏
CiteScore
26.10
自引率
9.70%
发文量
393
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Allergy is an international and multidisciplinary journal that aims to advance, impact, and communicate all aspects of the discipline of Allergy/Immunology. It publishes original articles, reviews, position papers, guidelines, editorials, news and commentaries, letters to the editors, and correspondences. The journal accepts articles based on their scientific merit and quality. Allergy seeks to maintain contact between basic and clinical Allergy/Immunology and encourages contributions from contributors and readers from all countries. In addition to its publication, Allergy also provides abstracting and indexing information. Some of the databases that include Allergy abstracts are Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Disease, Academic Search Alumni Edition, AgBiotech News & Information, AGRICOLA Database, Biological Abstracts, PubMed Dietary Supplement Subset, and Global Health, among others.
期刊最新文献
Autosomal Dominant Hyper-IgE Syndrome Patients Retain IL10-Producing preTh17-Cells That Are Activated by Opportunistic Pathogens and Support IgE Production. Live Zoster Vaccination and Reduced Risk of Atopic Dermatitis and Allergic Rhinitis. A One-Strength Dose Escalation Regimen for Birch Pollen SCIT Is Safe and Tolerable in Children, Adolescents, and Adults. Three-Year Follow-Up of the PACI Randomized Controlled Trial (PACI-ON): Effects of Early Intervention for Atopic Dermatitis on Atopic March. Small Airways Dysfunction and Remission in Adults With Asthma: A Longitudinal Exploratory Analysis of the AssessmenT of smalL Airways involvemeNT In aSthma ( ATLANTIS ) Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1