Soil carbon change in intensive agriculture after 25 years of conservation management

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Geoderma Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117133
S. Carolina Córdova, Alexandra N. Kravchenko, Jessica R. Miesel, G. Philip Robertson
{"title":"Soil carbon change in intensive agriculture after 25 years of conservation management","authors":"S. Carolina Córdova, Alexandra N. Kravchenko, Jessica R. Miesel, G. Philip Robertson","doi":"10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (SON) are strongly affected by land management but few long-term comparative studies have surveyed changes throughout the whole soil profile. We quantified 25-year SOC and SON changes to 1 m in 10 replicate ecosystems at an Upper Midwest, USA site. We compared four annual cropping systems in maize (<ce:italic>Zea mays</ce:italic>)-soybean (<ce:italic>Glycine</ce:italic> max)-winter wheat (<ce:italic>Triticum aestivum</ce:italic>) rotations, each managed differently (Conventional, No-till, Reduced input, and Biologically based); in three managed perennial systems (hybrid Poplar (<ce:italic>Populus</ce:italic> × <ce:italic>euramericana</ce:italic>), Alfalfa (<ce:italic>Medicago sativa</ce:italic>), and Conifer (<ce:italic>Pinus</ce:italic> spp.); and in three successional systems (Early, Mid- and Late succession undergoing a gradual change in species composition and structure over time). Both Reduced input and Biologically based systems included winter cover crops. Neither SOC nor SON changed significantly in the Conventional or Late successional systems over 25 years. All other systems gained SOC and SON to different degrees. SOC accrual was fastest in the Early successional system (0.8 ± 0.1 Mg C ha<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> y<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>) followed by Alfalfa and Conifer (avg. 0.7 ± 0.1 Mg C ha<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> y<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>), Poplar, Reduced input, and Biologically based systems (avg. 0.4 ± 0.1 Mg C ha<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> y<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>), and Mid-successional and No-till systems (0.3 and 0.2 Mg C ha<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> y<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup>, respectively). Over the most recent 12 years, rates of SOC accrual slowed in all systems except Reduced input and Mid-successional. There was no evidence of SOC loss at depth in any system, including No-till. Rates of SON accrual ranged from 64.7 to 0.8 kg N ha<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> y<ce:sup loc=\"post\">−1</ce:sup> in the order Alfalfa ≥ Early successional &gt; Reduced input and Biologically based ≥ Poplar &gt; No-till and Conifer &gt; Mid-successional systems. Pyrogenic C levels in the Conventional, Early, and Late successional systems were similar despite 17 years of annual burning in the Early successional system (∼ 15 % of SOC to 50 cm, on average, and ∼40 % of SOC from 50 to 100 cm). Results underscore the importance of cover crops, perennial crops, and no-till options for sequestering whole profile C in intensively managed croplands.","PeriodicalId":12511,"journal":{"name":"Geoderma","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoderma","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2024.117133","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Changes in soil organic carbon (SOC) and nitrogen (SON) are strongly affected by land management but few long-term comparative studies have surveyed changes throughout the whole soil profile. We quantified 25-year SOC and SON changes to 1 m in 10 replicate ecosystems at an Upper Midwest, USA site. We compared four annual cropping systems in maize (Zea mays)-soybean (Glycine max)-winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) rotations, each managed differently (Conventional, No-till, Reduced input, and Biologically based); in three managed perennial systems (hybrid Poplar (Populus × euramericana), Alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and Conifer (Pinus spp.); and in three successional systems (Early, Mid- and Late succession undergoing a gradual change in species composition and structure over time). Both Reduced input and Biologically based systems included winter cover crops. Neither SOC nor SON changed significantly in the Conventional or Late successional systems over 25 years. All other systems gained SOC and SON to different degrees. SOC accrual was fastest in the Early successional system (0.8 ± 0.1 Mg C ha−1 y−1) followed by Alfalfa and Conifer (avg. 0.7 ± 0.1 Mg C ha−1 y−1), Poplar, Reduced input, and Biologically based systems (avg. 0.4 ± 0.1 Mg C ha−1 y−1), and Mid-successional and No-till systems (0.3 and 0.2 Mg C ha−1 y−1, respectively). Over the most recent 12 years, rates of SOC accrual slowed in all systems except Reduced input and Mid-successional. There was no evidence of SOC loss at depth in any system, including No-till. Rates of SON accrual ranged from 64.7 to 0.8 kg N ha−1 y−1 in the order Alfalfa ≥ Early successional > Reduced input and Biologically based ≥ Poplar > No-till and Conifer > Mid-successional systems. Pyrogenic C levels in the Conventional, Early, and Late successional systems were similar despite 17 years of annual burning in the Early successional system (∼ 15 % of SOC to 50 cm, on average, and ∼40 % of SOC from 50 to 100 cm). Results underscore the importance of cover crops, perennial crops, and no-till options for sequestering whole profile C in intensively managed croplands.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
25 年养护管理后集约化农业的土壤碳变化
土壤有机碳(SOC)和氮(SON)的变化受土地管理的影响很大,但很少有长期比较研究对整个土壤剖面的变化进行调查。我们对美国上中西部一个地点的 10 个重复生态系统中 1 米范围内 25 年的 SOC 和 SON 变化进行了量化。我们比较了玉米(Zea mays)-大豆(Glycine max)-冬小麦(Triticum aestivum)轮作中的四种一年生耕作制度,每种制度的管理方式都不同(常规、免耕、减少投入和生物);三种多年生管理制度(杂交白杨(Populus × euramericana)、紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa)和针叶林(Pinus spp.三种演替系统(早期、中期和晚期演替,物种组成和结构随时间逐渐变化)。减少投入系统和以生物为基础的系统都包括冬季覆盖作物。在 25 年的时间里,传统演替系统和晚演替系统的 SOC 和 SON 都没有发生显著变化。所有其他系统都在不同程度上增加了 SOC 和 SON。早期演替系统的 SOC 增长最快(0.8 ± 0.1 兆克碳公顷-年-1),其次是紫花苜蓿和针叶林系统(平均 0.7 ± 0.1 兆克碳公顷-年-1)、杨树系统、减少投入系统和生物系统(平均 0.4 ± 0.1 兆克碳公顷-年-1),以及中期演替系统和免耕系统(分别为 0.3 和 0.2 兆克碳公顷-年-1)。在最近的 12 年中,除减少投入和中继性耕作外,所有耕作制度的 SOC 增长率都有所减缓。在包括免耕在内的任何系统中,都没有证据表明 SOC 在深层流失。按照紫花苜蓿≥早期演替系统、减少投入和基于生物的系统≥杨树系统、免耕和针叶林系统、中期演替系统的顺序,SON 的累积率介于 64.7 至 0.8 千克氮/公顷/年之间。传统、早期和晚期演替系统中的热原碳含量相似,尽管早期演替系统中每年焚烧 17 年(平均 50 厘米以下的 SOC 含量为 15%,50 至 100 厘米的 SOC 含量为 40%)。研究结果强调了覆盖作物、多年生作物和免耕方案对于在集约化管理的耕地中封存全剖面碳的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geoderma
Geoderma 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.60%
发文量
597
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Geoderma - the global journal of soil science - welcomes authors, readers and soil research from all parts of the world, encourages worldwide soil studies, and embraces all aspects of soil science and its associated pedagogy. The journal particularly welcomes interdisciplinary work focusing on dynamic soil processes and functions across space and time.
期刊最新文献
Behavior of soil aggregates in reclaimed farmland with different restoration durations: Mediating factors and mechanisms Using satellite-derived attributes as proxies for soil carbon cycling to map carbon stocks in alpine grassland soils Soil carbon change in intensive agriculture after 25 years of conservation management Nitrogen deposition mitigates long-term phosphorus input-induced stimulative effects on soil respiration in a tropical forest Evaluating of ground surface freeze–thaw and the interrelationship with vegetation cover on the Qinghai-Xizang Plateau
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1