Does mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting program deter corporate greenwashing?

IF 8.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123740
Nguyen H Luu, Chau Le, Hiep N Luu, Dung T K Nguyen
{"title":"Does mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting program deter corporate greenwashing?","authors":"Nguyen H Luu, Chau Le, Hiep N Luu, Dung T K Nguyen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study examines the impact of the mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting program (GHGRP) on corporate greenwashing behaviour. Utilising the GHGRP in the United States as a quasi-natural experiment, we perform a difference-in-difference analysis to a panel dataset of 2731 publicly listed US firms from 2007 to 2022. The data consist of annual observations of firm-level variables, including ESG performance and disclosure metrics, financial characteristics, and environmental innovation indicators. Our results reveal a notable reduction in greenwashing behaviour following the adoption of the GHGRP, suggesting that increased transparency and accountability discourage deceptive disclosure practices. A decomposition analysis shows that the GHGRP motivates firms to improve actual ESG performance while curbing inflated ESG claims. Larger and more profitable firms exhibit a more significant decrease in greenwashing, indicating that those under greater public scrutiny respond more strongly to regulatory oversight. Additionally, firms with higher levels of environmental innovation demonstrate a greater reduction in greenwashing post-GHGRP adoption, reflecting an alignment between sustainability commitments and corporate culture. This study offers valuable insights for firm managers, investors, and policymakers on leveraging the GHGRP framework to promote transparency in corporate reporting practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123740"},"PeriodicalIF":8.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123740","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study examines the impact of the mandatory greenhouse gas emissions reporting program (GHGRP) on corporate greenwashing behaviour. Utilising the GHGRP in the United States as a quasi-natural experiment, we perform a difference-in-difference analysis to a panel dataset of 2731 publicly listed US firms from 2007 to 2022. The data consist of annual observations of firm-level variables, including ESG performance and disclosure metrics, financial characteristics, and environmental innovation indicators. Our results reveal a notable reduction in greenwashing behaviour following the adoption of the GHGRP, suggesting that increased transparency and accountability discourage deceptive disclosure practices. A decomposition analysis shows that the GHGRP motivates firms to improve actual ESG performance while curbing inflated ESG claims. Larger and more profitable firms exhibit a more significant decrease in greenwashing, indicating that those under greater public scrutiny respond more strongly to regulatory oversight. Additionally, firms with higher levels of environmental innovation demonstrate a greater reduction in greenwashing post-GHGRP adoption, reflecting an alignment between sustainability commitments and corporate culture. This study offers valuable insights for firm managers, investors, and policymakers on leveraging the GHGRP framework to promote transparency in corporate reporting practices.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强制性温室气体排放报告计划是否能阻止企业的 "洗绿 "行为?
本研究考察了强制性温室气体排放报告计划(GHGRP)对企业“漂绿”行为的影响。利用美国GHGRP作为准自然实验,我们对2007年至2022年2731家美国上市公司的面板数据集进行了差异中差异分析。这些数据包括对公司层面变量的年度观察,包括ESG绩效和披露指标、财务特征和环境创新指标。我们的研究结果显示,采用GHGRP后,“洗绿”行为显著减少,这表明透明度和问责制的提高阻碍了欺骗性披露行为。一项分解分析表明,GHGRP激励企业提高实际ESG绩效,同时抑制夸大的ESG索赔。规模更大、利润更高的公司在“漂绿”方面表现出更显著的下降,这表明那些受到更大公众监督的公司对监管监督的反应更强烈。此外,环境创新水平较高的公司在ghgrp之后的绿色清洗中表现出更大的减少,这反映了可持续发展承诺与企业文化之间的一致性。本研究为企业管理者、投资者和政策制定者提供了利用GHGRP框架提高企业报告实践透明度的宝贵见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Performance-informed life cycle assessment of waste-derived asphalt mixtures for full aggregate replacement Antimicrobial resistance genes in biosolid-amended pasture soils: Insights from a pilot study on a sheep farm Response strategies of bacterial and micro-eukaryotic communities to environmental changes: Evidence from alpine lakes sedimentary DNA in Southwest China Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification microbial fuel cells (SND-MFC) for nitrogen removal and bioelectricity recovery: a review of performances, mechanisms, microorganisms, and applications Response of microbial nitrogen removal to sinuosity in river bends: mechanisms and development of physics-informed neural networks model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1