Decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit may signal degree of hemorrhagic shock: retrospective evaluation in a dog model.

IF 1.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES American journal of veterinary research Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0217
Jonathan S Jahr, Jonathan Dang, Ashley Tong, Stephanie Iskandar, Anamika Patel, Tristan Grogan, Klaus Hopster, Berndt Driessen, Robert A Gunther
{"title":"Decreases in hemoglobin and hematocrit may signal degree of hemorrhagic shock: retrospective evaluation in a dog model.","authors":"Jonathan S Jahr, Jonathan Dang, Ashley Tong, Stephanie Iskandar, Anamika Patel, Tristan Grogan, Klaus Hopster, Berndt Driessen, Robert A Gunther","doi":"10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0217","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Data were extracted from preexisting published studies and evaluated retrospectively to compare lactate and base deficit values at baseline and posthemorrhage with changes in corresponding hemoglobin (Hb) and Hct measurements to assess any association of such changes with severity of hemorrhage over time. To understand the goal, the objective of this study was to demonstrate statistical changes in laboratory values as described above.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Previous prospectively designed experiments on 120 mixed-breed dogs were conducted. Various parameters, including Hb and Hct, lactate concentration, and base deficit, were extracted from the previously mentioned experiments. To validate this retrospective study, subset data on heart rate and arterial pressure were compared. In a subset analysis, 60 experiments were extracted to compare baseline mean arterial pressure to posthemorrhagic values to prove the validity of this model. Published studies were evaluated retrospectively to compare lactate and base deficit values at baseline and posthemorrhage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Arterial pressure is lowest posthemorrhage, increases, then stabilizes. Baseline Hb averaged 15.1 g/dL and Hct 43.4%, and posthemorrhage values averaged 12.1 g/dL (Hb) and 35.3% (Hct). Significant differences were observed for both Hb (3.0 g/dL difference; P < .001) and Hct (8.3% difference; P < .001) posthemorrhage. Lactate significantly increased (2.1; P < .001), and base deficit significantly decreased (5.2; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The data collected retrospectively validated the model for significant hypotension. It was then possible to evaluate whether Hb and Hct may accurately predict the degree of hemorrhage. In this model, both Hb and Hct decreased posthemorrhage significantly, although the actual change in Hb and Hct posthemorrhage was modest. Lactate concentration increased, and base deficit decreased.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>The data suggest that Hb, Hct, lactate, and base deficit should be studied to see if they may have a potential role in guiding resuscitation decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7754,"journal":{"name":"American journal of veterinary research","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of veterinary research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.24.08.0217","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Data were extracted from preexisting published studies and evaluated retrospectively to compare lactate and base deficit values at baseline and posthemorrhage with changes in corresponding hemoglobin (Hb) and Hct measurements to assess any association of such changes with severity of hemorrhage over time. To understand the goal, the objective of this study was to demonstrate statistical changes in laboratory values as described above.

Methods: Previous prospectively designed experiments on 120 mixed-breed dogs were conducted. Various parameters, including Hb and Hct, lactate concentration, and base deficit, were extracted from the previously mentioned experiments. To validate this retrospective study, subset data on heart rate and arterial pressure were compared. In a subset analysis, 60 experiments were extracted to compare baseline mean arterial pressure to posthemorrhagic values to prove the validity of this model. Published studies were evaluated retrospectively to compare lactate and base deficit values at baseline and posthemorrhage.

Results: Arterial pressure is lowest posthemorrhage, increases, then stabilizes. Baseline Hb averaged 15.1 g/dL and Hct 43.4%, and posthemorrhage values averaged 12.1 g/dL (Hb) and 35.3% (Hct). Significant differences were observed for both Hb (3.0 g/dL difference; P < .001) and Hct (8.3% difference; P < .001) posthemorrhage. Lactate significantly increased (2.1; P < .001), and base deficit significantly decreased (5.2; P < .001).

Conclusions: The data collected retrospectively validated the model for significant hypotension. It was then possible to evaluate whether Hb and Hct may accurately predict the degree of hemorrhage. In this model, both Hb and Hct decreased posthemorrhage significantly, although the actual change in Hb and Hct posthemorrhage was modest. Lactate concentration increased, and base deficit decreased.

Clinical relevance: The data suggest that Hb, Hct, lactate, and base deficit should be studied to see if they may have a potential role in guiding resuscitation decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血红蛋白和血细胞比容的下降可能是失血性休克程度的信号:在狗模型中进行的回顾性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Veterinary Research supports the collaborative exchange of information between researchers and clinicians by publishing novel research findings that bridge the gulf between basic research and clinical practice or that help to translate laboratory research and preclinical studies to the development of clinical trials and clinical practice. The journal welcomes submission of high-quality original studies and review articles in a wide range of scientific fields, including anatomy, anesthesiology, animal welfare, behavior, epidemiology, genetics, heredity, infectious disease, molecular biology, oncology, pharmacology, pathogenic mechanisms, physiology, surgery, theriogenology, toxicology, and vaccinology. Species of interest include production animals, companion animals, equids, exotic animals, birds, reptiles, and wild and marine animals. Reports of laboratory animal studies and studies involving the use of animals as experimental models of human diseases are considered only when the study results are of demonstrable benefit to the species used in the research or to another species of veterinary interest. Other fields of interest or animals species are not necessarily excluded from consideration, but such reports must focus on novel research findings. Submitted papers must make an original and substantial contribution to the veterinary medicine knowledge base; preliminary studies are not appropriate.
期刊最新文献
A generic precurved interlocking nail is more compatible with femoral and tibial morphology than a straight nail in dogs. Brain-type natriuretic peptide is a useful biomarker of cardiovascular disease and predictor of cardiac-related mortality in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Mild hypothermia is associated with altered volume kinetic parameters of an intravenous crystalloid fluid bolus in healthy isoflurane-anesthetized cats. Accuracy of a flash glucose monitoring system in healthy dogs during isoflurane anesthesia. Point-of-care platform integrated with deep-learning, convolutional neural network algorithms effectively evaluates canine and feline peripheral blood smears.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1