Enhanced Reader Confidence and Differentiation of Calcification from Cerebral Microbleed Diagnosis Using QSM Relative to SWI.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Clinical Neuroradiology Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1007/s00062-024-01478-0
Chris Kang, Pritesh Mehta, Yi S Chang, Rafeeque A Bhadelia, Rafael Rojas, Max Wintermark, Jalal B Andre, Ethan Yang, Magdy Selim, Ajith J Thomas, Aristotelis Filippidis, Yan Wen, Pascal Spincemaille, Nils D Forkert, Yi Wang, Salil Soman
{"title":"Enhanced Reader Confidence and Differentiation of Calcification from Cerebral Microbleed Diagnosis Using QSM Relative to SWI.","authors":"Chris Kang, Pritesh Mehta, Yi S Chang, Rafeeque A Bhadelia, Rafael Rojas, Max Wintermark, Jalal B Andre, Ethan Yang, Magdy Selim, Ajith J Thomas, Aristotelis Filippidis, Yan Wen, Pascal Spincemaille, Nils D Forkert, Yi Wang, Salil Soman","doi":"10.1007/s00062-024-01478-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Accurate detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) is important for detection of multiple conditions. However, CMBs can be challenging to identify on MR images, especially for distinguishing CMBs from the mimic of calcification. We performed a comparative reader study to assess the diagnostic performance of two primary MR sequences for differentiating CMBs from calcification.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Under IRB approved exempt retrospective protocol, 49 adult patients with identifiable intracranial hemorrhage who underwent multi-echo 3D Gradient Recall Echo (GRE) using 3T MRI were non-sequentially recruited under a retrospective IRB approved protocol. Multi-echo complex total field inversion quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility weighted imaging/phase (SWI/P) images were generated for all patients. 53 lesion ROIs were identified and classified on provided images by an expert panel of three neuroradiologists as either: CMB, Blood, Calcification, or Other. Three additional neuroradiologists subsequently reviewed the same SWI/P and QSM images in independent sessions and designated lesions as either blood and/or calcification using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, on lesion classification and reader diagnostic accuracy, reader confidence-level, reader agreement-level, and the predictability of mean susceptibility values between SWI/P and QSM were conducted with logistic regression and calculation of Fleiss' κ, Kendall's w, Krippendorff's α.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across all qualitative assessment and quantitative metrics measured (simple accuracy, confidence as degree of ground truth alignment, and inter-rater agreement) QSM outperformed SWI/P. Additionally, logistic regression of average QSM voxel susceptibility achieved near-perfect separation in differentiating between CMB and calcification in the limited number of CMB/Calcification ROIs, indicating a high predictability.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that QSM offers improved detectability and classification of CMBs compared to the conventionally utilized SWI/P sequence. In addition, QSM simplifies the interpretation workflow by reducing the number of requisite images compared with the conventional counterpart, with improved diagnostic confidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":10391,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00062-024-01478-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Accurate detection of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) is important for detection of multiple conditions. However, CMBs can be challenging to identify on MR images, especially for distinguishing CMBs from the mimic of calcification. We performed a comparative reader study to assess the diagnostic performance of two primary MR sequences for differentiating CMBs from calcification.

Methods: Under IRB approved exempt retrospective protocol, 49 adult patients with identifiable intracranial hemorrhage who underwent multi-echo 3D Gradient Recall Echo (GRE) using 3T MRI were non-sequentially recruited under a retrospective IRB approved protocol. Multi-echo complex total field inversion quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) and susceptibility weighted imaging/phase (SWI/P) images were generated for all patients. 53 lesion ROIs were identified and classified on provided images by an expert panel of three neuroradiologists as either: CMB, Blood, Calcification, or Other. Three additional neuroradiologists subsequently reviewed the same SWI/P and QSM images in independent sessions and designated lesions as either blood and/or calcification using a 5-point Likert scale. Statistical analyses, on lesion classification and reader diagnostic accuracy, reader confidence-level, reader agreement-level, and the predictability of mean susceptibility values between SWI/P and QSM were conducted with logistic regression and calculation of Fleiss' κ, Kendall's w, Krippendorff's α.

Results: Across all qualitative assessment and quantitative metrics measured (simple accuracy, confidence as degree of ground truth alignment, and inter-rater agreement) QSM outperformed SWI/P. Additionally, logistic regression of average QSM voxel susceptibility achieved near-perfect separation in differentiating between CMB and calcification in the limited number of CMB/Calcification ROIs, indicating a high predictability.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that QSM offers improved detectability and classification of CMBs compared to the conventionally utilized SWI/P sequence. In addition, QSM simplifies the interpretation workflow by reducing the number of requisite images compared with the conventional counterpart, with improved diagnostic confidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
相对于SWI, QSM对脑微出血钙化的诊断增强了读者的信心和鉴别。
目的:准确检测脑微出血(CMBs)对多种疾病的检测具有重要意义。然而,在MR图像上识别CMBs可能具有挑战性,特别是将CMBs与钙化模拟物区分开来。我们进行了一项比较研究,以评估两种主要MR序列在鉴别CMBs和钙化方面的诊断性能。方法:在IRB批准的豁免回顾性方案下,采用回顾性IRB批准的方案,非顺序招募49例可识别颅内出血的成年患者,这些患者使用3T MRI进行了多回波3D梯度回忆回波(GRE)检查。所有患者均生成多回波复全场反演定量敏感性图(QSM)和敏感性加权成像/相位图(SWI/P)。由三位神经放射学家组成的专家小组在提供的图像上识别并分类了53个病变roi: CMB、Blood、钙化或其他。随后,另外三名神经放射学家在独立的会议中检查了相同的SWI/P和QSM图像,并使用5点李克特量表将病变指定为血液和/或钙化。采用logistic回归并计算Fleiss’k、Kendall’s w、Krippendorff’s α,对SWI/P与QSM的病变分类和诊断准确率、读者置信度、读者同意度以及平均敏感性值的可预测性进行统计分析。结果:在所有测量的定性评估和定量度量(简单的准确性,置信度作为地面真实校准的程度,以及评级者之间的一致性)中,QSM优于SWI/P。此外,在有限数量的CMB/钙化roi中,平均QSM体素敏感性的逻辑回归在区分CMB和钙化方面实现了近乎完美的分离,表明具有很高的可预测性。结论:我们的研究表明,与传统使用的SWI/P序列相比,QSM提供了更好的CMBs检测和分类。此外,与传统方法相比,通过减少所需图像的数量,QSM简化了解释工作流程,提高了诊断的可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuroradiology
Clinical Neuroradiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Clinical Neuroradiology provides current information, original contributions, and reviews in the field of neuroradiology. An interdisciplinary approach is accomplished by diagnostic and therapeutic contributions related to associated subjects. The international coverage and relevance of the journal is underlined by its being the official journal of the German, Swiss, and Austrian Societies of Neuroradiology.
期刊最新文献
Modulating Cognitive Function with Antihypertensive Medications: a Comprehensive Systematic Review On FMRI Studies. Volumetry of Selected Brain Regions-Can We Compare MRI Examinations of Different Manufacturers and Field Strengths? Societies' Communications. CT Angiography, MR Angiography, and Their Combined Use for Detection of Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: Comparison with Digital Subtraction Angiography and 3-dimensional Rotational Angiography. Deep-Learning-based Automated Identification of Ventriculoperitoneal-Shunt Valve Models from Skull X-rays.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1