The bacterial burden of worn face masks-observational research and literature review.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460981
Kai Kisielinski, Barbara Wojtasik, Aleksandra Zalewska, David M Livermore, Agata Jurczak-Kurek
{"title":"The bacterial burden of worn face masks-observational research and literature review.","authors":"Kai Kisielinski, Barbara Wojtasik, Aleksandra Zalewska, David M Livermore, Agata Jurczak-Kurek","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Facemasks were widely mandated during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Especially the use by the general population is associated with a higher risk of improper handling of the mask and contamination and potential adverse microbiological consequences.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We investigated and quantified bacterial accumulation in facemasks used by the general population, using 16S rRNA (Sanger Sequencing), culture and biochemical analysis along with Rose Bengal staining. Additionally, a systematic overview of the literature on face mask contamination was undertaken.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found an average bacterial load of 4.24 × 10<sup>4</sup> CFU recovered/mask, with a maximum load of 2.85 × 10<sup>5</sup> CFU. This maximum is 310 times higher than the limit value for contamination of ventilation system outlet surfaces specified by the German standard VDI 6022. Biochemical and molecular identification predominantly found <i>Staphylococcus species</i> (80%), including <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i>, along with endospore-forming Bacillus spp. Literature reports also indicate contamination of masks by bacterial and fungal opportunists of the genera <i>Acinetobacter, Aspergillus, Alternaria, Bacillus, Cadosporium, Candida, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Klebsiella</i> (including <i>K. pneumoniae</i>), <i>Micrococcus, Microsporum, Mucor, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus</i>. Bacterial counts increase linearly with wearing duration.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Prolonged use may affect the skin and respiratory microbiomes, promoting consequential eye, skin, oral and airway conditions. These aspects underscore the urgent need for further research and a risk-benefit analysis in respect of mask use, particularly given their unproven efficacy in disrupting the transmission of respiratory viruses and their adverse social consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"12 ","pages":"1460981"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649673/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1460981","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Facemasks were widely mandated during the recent SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Especially the use by the general population is associated with a higher risk of improper handling of the mask and contamination and potential adverse microbiological consequences.

Methods: We investigated and quantified bacterial accumulation in facemasks used by the general population, using 16S rRNA (Sanger Sequencing), culture and biochemical analysis along with Rose Bengal staining. Additionally, a systematic overview of the literature on face mask contamination was undertaken.

Results: We found an average bacterial load of 4.24 × 104 CFU recovered/mask, with a maximum load of 2.85 × 105 CFU. This maximum is 310 times higher than the limit value for contamination of ventilation system outlet surfaces specified by the German standard VDI 6022. Biochemical and molecular identification predominantly found Staphylococcus species (80%), including Staphylococcus aureus, along with endospore-forming Bacillus spp. Literature reports also indicate contamination of masks by bacterial and fungal opportunists of the genera Acinetobacter, Aspergillus, Alternaria, Bacillus, Cadosporium, Candida, Escherichia, Enterobacter, Enterococcus, Klebsiella (including K. pneumoniae), Micrococcus, Microsporum, Mucor, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus and Streptococcus. Bacterial counts increase linearly with wearing duration.

Discussion: Prolonged use may affect the skin and respiratory microbiomes, promoting consequential eye, skin, oral and airway conditions. These aspects underscore the urgent need for further research and a risk-benefit analysis in respect of mask use, particularly given their unproven efficacy in disrupting the transmission of respiratory viruses and their adverse social consequences.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
佩戴口罩带来的细菌负担--观察研究和文献综述。
导言:在最近的SARS-CoV-2大流行期间,口罩被广泛强制使用。特别是普通人群使用口罩会增加口罩处理不当和污染以及潜在不良微生物后果的风险。方法:采用16S rRNA (Sanger Sequencing)、培养和生化分析以及Rose Bengal染色,对普通人群使用的口罩进行细菌积累调查和定量。此外,对口罩污染的文献进行了系统的综述。结果:平均细菌负荷为4.24 × 104 CFU /口罩,最大负荷为2.85 × 105 CFU。这个最大值是德国标准VDI 6022规定的通风系统出口表面污染极限值的310倍。生化和分子鉴定主要发现葡萄球菌种类(80%),包括金黄色葡萄球菌,以及芽孢内形成芽孢杆菌。文献报道还表明,口罩被不动杆菌属、曲霉属、Alternaria、芽孢杆菌属、Cadosporium、念珠菌属、埃希氏菌属、肠杆菌属、肠球菌属、克雷伯氏菌(包括肺炎克雷伯菌)、微球菌、小孢子菌、毛霉菌、假单胞菌、葡萄球菌和链球菌。细菌数量随着佩戴时间的延长呈线性增加。讨论:长时间使用可能会影响皮肤和呼吸道微生物群,促进相应的眼睛、皮肤、口腔和气道状况。这些方面突出表明,迫切需要对口罩的使用进行进一步研究和风险效益分析,特别是考虑到口罩在阻断呼吸道病毒传播方面的功效尚未得到证实,以及其不利的社会后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Innovative socio-sanitary rehabilitation models in central nervous system disorders: a systematic review. Knowledge and attitudes toward emergency contraception among pharmacy students and community pharmacists in Poland. Knowledge, attitude, and practice toward stroke among university students in Saudi Arabia: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Leveraging real-time genomic surveillance to combat infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance in cancer patients. Tough on germs, gentle on hands: a cross-sectional study on hand skin health, skincare and hygiene habit changes among medical students in their clinical years in Dubai, the United Arab Emirates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1