Comparing the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection versus Systemic Steroids in Treating Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Breast Care Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-10-04 DOI:10.1159/000541707
Buşra Burcu, Işık Çetinoğlu, Nadir Adnan Hacim, Esma Çerekçi, Aziz Şener, Ramazan Uçak, Ceylan Yanar, Cemal Kaya
{"title":"Comparing the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection versus Systemic Steroids in Treating Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience.","authors":"Buşra Burcu, Işık Çetinoğlu, Nadir Adnan Hacim, Esma Çerekçi, Aziz Şener, Ramazan Uçak, Ceylan Yanar, Cemal Kaya","doi":"10.1159/000541707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a benign inflammatory condition predominantly affecting women of reproductive age, particularly those with a history of breastfeeding. Although the precise etiology remains unknown, treatment strategies continue to be a subject of debate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intralesional steroid (ILS) injections with oral steroid (OS) therapy in managing IGM.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A total of 72 patients, clinically and histopathologically diagnosed with IGM, were treated with either ILSs (group ILS, <i>n</i> = 47) or OSs (group OS, <i>n</i> = 25) at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. The data were retrospectively analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean age of the patients was 33.5 years (range: 22-56). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, clinical findings, or laboratory results. The mean treatment duration was 6 months. There were no significant differences in treatment response or recurrence rates between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of side effects, with 6.3% in the ILS group compared to 36% in the OS group (<i>p</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given its ease of application, lower incidence of side effects, and comparable efficacy, ILS injections may be considered a first-line treatment option in the management of IGM.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"19 6","pages":"307-315"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000541707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Idiopathic granulomatous mastitis (IGM) is a benign inflammatory condition predominantly affecting women of reproductive age, particularly those with a history of breastfeeding. Although the precise etiology remains unknown, treatment strategies continue to be a subject of debate. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of intralesional steroid (ILS) injections with oral steroid (OS) therapy in managing IGM.

Materials and methods: A total of 72 patients, clinically and histopathologically diagnosed with IGM, were treated with either ILSs (group ILS, n = 47) or OSs (group OS, n = 25) at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2022 and January 2024. The data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 33.5 years (range: 22-56). No statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of demographic characteristics, presenting symptoms, clinical findings, or laboratory results. The mean treatment duration was 6 months. There were no significant differences in treatment response or recurrence rates between the two groups. However, there was a statistically significant difference in the incidence of side effects, with 6.3% in the ILS group compared to 36% in the OS group (p = 0.001).

Conclusion: Given its ease of application, lower incidence of side effects, and comparable efficacy, ILS injections may be considered a first-line treatment option in the management of IGM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较病灶内注射与全身类固醇治疗特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎的疗效:来自单中心经验的见解。
目的:特发性肉芽肿性乳腺炎(IGM)是一种良性炎症,主要影响育龄妇女,特别是有母乳喂养史的妇女。虽然确切的病因尚不清楚,但治疗策略仍然是争论的主题。本研究旨在比较病灶内类固醇(ILS)注射与口服类固醇(OS)治疗IGM的疗效。材料和方法:共有72例临床和组织病理学诊断为IGM的患者,于2022年1月至2024年1月在三级转诊医院接受il组(il组,n = 47)或OS组(OS组,n = 25)治疗。对资料进行回顾性分析。结果:患者平均年龄33.5岁(范围22 ~ 56岁)。在人口学特征、表现症状、临床表现或实验室结果方面,两组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。平均治疗时间为6个月。两组患者的治疗效果和复发率无显著差异。然而,在副作用发生率方面存在统计学差异,ILS组为6.3%,而OS组为36% (p = 0.001)。结论:ILS注射剂应用方便、副作用发生率低、疗效相当,可作为治疗IGM的一线治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Breast Care
Breast Care 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.80%
发文量
45
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Breast Care'' is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that covers all aspects of breast biology. Due to its interdisciplinary perspective, it encompasses articles on basic research, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of malignant diseases of the breast. In addition to presenting current developments in clinical research, the scope of clinical practice is broadened by including articles on relevant legal, financial and economic issues.
期刊最新文献
Breast-Conserving Surgery with Immediate Partial Breast Reconstruction by Using Pedicled Thoracodorsal Artery Perforator Flap: A 7-Year Follow-Up of 50 Women. Comparing the Efficacy of Intralesional Injection versus Systemic Steroids in Treating Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Insights from a Single-Center Experience. Exploring the Impact of Sarcopenia on Mortality in Breast Cancer Patients: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Diagnosis, Approach, and Clinical Classification of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: Consensus Report. Retrospective Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Primary Breast Cancer Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1