Nina Ditsch, Michael Untch, Peter A Fasching, Susanne Briest, Johannes Ettl, Renate Haidinger, Diana Lüftner, Christian Maurer, Volkmar Müller, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Eugen Ruckhäberle, Christian Schem, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Nadia Harbeck, Rachel Wuerstlein
Background: The "International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer" was initiated with the rationale to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on available evidence. The aim was to ensure that all ABC patients worldwide receive adequate treatment and get access to new diagnostic, therapeutic, and supportive options.
Topics of abc8: Since the beginning ABC Consensus Conference has been organized in Lisbon/Portugal. The 8th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC8) took place there from November 4th to 8th, 2025, and focused not only on metastatic disease but also on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer (BC). Special topics were new drugs and new therapies with promising results in randomized clinical trials. Not all of them are currently approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) or EMA (European Medicines Agency) for the indication in which the study was conducted. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were integrated into the ABC Conference and contributed substantially to the consensus.
Rationale for the manuscript: A German BC expert panel comments on the voting results of the ABC8 panelists regarding their relevance for routine clinical practice in Germany. As with previous meetings, the ABC8 votes focused on modified or new statements. Statements not modified for the ABC8 consensus remain valid. The German comments are always based on the current recommendations of the "Breast Committee" of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma).
背景:“国际晚期乳腺癌共识会议”的发起是基于现有证据来规范晚期乳腺癌(ABC)治疗的基本原理。目的是确保全世界所有ABC患者得到充分的治疗,并获得新的诊断、治疗和支持选择。abc8主题:自开始以来,在葡萄牙里斯本组织了ABC协商一致会议。第八届ABC国际共识会议(ABC8)于2025年11月4日至8日在那里举行,不仅关注转移性疾病,还关注局部晚期和炎症性乳腺癌(BC)。专题是在随机临床试验中取得良好结果的新药和新疗法。并不是所有的药物目前都被FDA(食品和药物管理局)或EMA(欧洲药品管理局)批准用于进行研究的适应症。与前几年一样,来自世界各地的患者倡导者被纳入ABC会议,并为达成共识做出了重大贡献。原稿理由:德国BC专家小组对ABC8小组成员的投票结果进行了评论,讨论了他们与德国常规临床实践的相关性。与以前的会议一样,ABC8的投票集中在修改或新的声明上。未根据ABC8共识修改的声明仍然有效。德国的评论总是基于妇科肿瘤工作组(Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma)的“乳房委员会”的当前建议。
{"title":"ABC8 Consensus: Assessment by a German Group of Experts.","authors":"Nina Ditsch, Michael Untch, Peter A Fasching, Susanne Briest, Johannes Ettl, Renate Haidinger, Diana Lüftner, Christian Maurer, Volkmar Müller, Tjoung-Won Park-Simon, Eugen Ruckhäberle, Christian Schem, Eva Schumacher-Wulf, Nadia Harbeck, Rachel Wuerstlein","doi":"10.1159/000550147","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000550147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The \"International Consensus Conference for Advanced Breast Cancer\" was initiated with the rationale to standardize treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) based on available evidence. The aim was to ensure that all ABC patients worldwide receive adequate treatment and get access to new diagnostic, therapeutic, and supportive options.</p><p><strong>Topics of abc8: </strong>Since the beginning ABC Consensus Conference has been organized in Lisbon/Portugal. The 8th International Consensus Conference for ABC (ABC8) took place there from November 4th to 8th, 2025, and focused not only on metastatic disease but also on locally advanced and inflammatory breast cancer (BC). Special topics were new drugs and new therapies with promising results in randomized clinical trials. Not all of them are currently approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) or EMA (European Medicines Agency) for the indication in which the study was conducted. As in previous years, patient advocates from around the world were integrated into the ABC Conference and contributed substantially to the consensus.</p><p><strong>Rationale for the manuscript: </strong>A German BC expert panel comments on the voting results of the ABC8 panelists regarding their relevance for routine clinical practice in Germany. As with previous meetings, the ABC8 votes focused on modified or new statements. Statements not modified for the ABC8 consensus remain valid. The German comments are always based on the current recommendations of the \"Breast Committee\" of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie, AGO Mamma).</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2026-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851628/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146084319","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Billy Ho Hung Cheung, Ka Yan Theresa Tse, Sara Wing Yung Li, Ava Kwong
Introduction: Chylous leakage is a rare complication following breast cancer surgery, characterized by milky, lipid-rich fluid collection in surgical drains. While well documented in thoracic and abdominal surgeries, its occurrence after breast procedures remains poorly understood with limited literature. This study evaluates the incidence, characteristics, and management of this complication.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted, and seven patients with confirmed chyle leakage were identified among 1,441 breast cancer patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at two Hong Kong surgical centres within a 5-year period. Patients with prolonged drainage or milky fluid underwent laboratory analysis to confirm chylous leakage. Demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical details, management strategies, and outcomes were analysed.
Results: Seven patients (0.49%) developed chylous leakage. The median age was 67 years, and the median BMI was 22.2 kg/m2. Four patients had right-sided, and three had left-sided breast cancer. Most tumours (85.7%) were located in the upper outer quadrant. All patients underwent mastectomy with various axillary procedures. Chylous drainage was identified between postoperative days 2 and 15 in 6 patients, with 1 late presentation at 6 months. Six patients (85.7%) were successfully managed with dietary modifications (medium-chain triglyceride or low-fat diet), with resolution within 3-11 days. One patient with late presentation required surgical intervention as definitive treatment. No recurrences or delays in adjuvant therapy occurred.
Conclusion: Chylous leakage after breast cancer surgery can occur on either side and can occur in patient with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conservative management with dietary modification is highly effective as first-line treatment. This study highlights the need for increased awareness of this complication and provides foundation for further investigation into its incidence, pathophysiology, and optimal management.
{"title":"Postoperative Chylous Leakage in Breast Cancer Patients: A Multicentre Case Series.","authors":"Billy Ho Hung Cheung, Ka Yan Theresa Tse, Sara Wing Yung Li, Ava Kwong","doi":"10.1159/000548842","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548842","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Chylous leakage is a rare complication following breast cancer surgery, characterized by milky, lipid-rich fluid collection in surgical drains. While well documented in thoracic and abdominal surgeries, its occurrence after breast procedures remains poorly understood with limited literature. This study evaluates the incidence, characteristics, and management of this complication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted, and seven patients with confirmed chyle leakage were identified among 1,441 breast cancer patients who underwent breast cancer surgery at two Hong Kong surgical centres within a 5-year period. Patients with prolonged drainage or milky fluid underwent laboratory analysis to confirm chylous leakage. Demographics, tumour characteristics, surgical details, management strategies, and outcomes were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven patients (0.49%) developed chylous leakage. The median age was 67 years, and the median BMI was 22.2 kg/m<sup>2</sup>. Four patients had right-sided, and three had left-sided breast cancer. Most tumours (85.7%) were located in the upper outer quadrant. All patients underwent mastectomy with various axillary procedures. Chylous drainage was identified between postoperative days 2 and 15 in 6 patients, with 1 late presentation at 6 months. Six patients (85.7%) were successfully managed with dietary modifications (medium-chain triglyceride or low-fat diet), with resolution within 3-11 days. One patient with late presentation required surgical intervention as definitive treatment. No recurrences or delays in adjuvant therapy occurred.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Chylous leakage after breast cancer surgery can occur on either side and can occur in patient with sentinel lymph node biopsy. Conservative management with dietary modification is highly effective as first-line treatment. This study highlights the need for increased awareness of this complication and provides foundation for further investigation into its incidence, pathophysiology, and optimal management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12830030/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146049984","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura Rickerl, Harald Bartsch, Nadia Harbeck, Daniel Maria Hofmann, Thomas Kolben, Tom Degenhardt, Karl Sotlar, Rachel Wuerstlein
<p><strong>Background: </strong>The decision-making process regarding adjuvant treatment in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer (EBC) is often not sufficient, when based on established clinicopathological parameters. Additional prognostic tests could facilitate these decisions. This paper compares the well-validated invasion marker urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (uPA/PAI-1) with the Prosigna® assay, which is based on the PAM50 gene signature. Prosigna® also provides a prognostic risk assessment (risk of recurrence, Prosigna®-ROR), taking tumor burden and the intrinsic molecular subtype into account.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2013 to April 2014, we selected 42 postmenopausal EBC patients (ER+/HER2-) from the database of the Breast Centre of the University of Munich (LMU). In the context of therapy decision-making, uPA/PAI-1 testing had already been performed on the selected patients' fresh frozen tumor tissue. The patient's data were pseudonymized, and the Prosigna® assay was performed retrospectively using archived Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. A 5-year follow-up was carried out in March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients (<i>n</i> = 42) had ER+/HER2-negative invasive breast cancers. According to Prosigna®, 22 (52.4%) tumors were classified as low-risk, 14 (33.3%) as intermediate-risk, and 6 (14.3%) as high-risk. Among the 22 Prosigna® low-risk tumors, 13 (59.1%) were classified as uPA/PAI-1 low-risk and 9 (40.9%) were classified as uPA/PAI-1 high-risk. The 14 Prosigna® intermediate-risk tumors divided into 6 (42.9%) uPA/PAI-1 low-risk and 8 (57.1%) uPA/PAI-1 high-risk. Among the 6 patients classified as high-risk using Prosigna®-ROR, one (16.7%) was classified as low-risk and the other 5 (83.3%) as high-risk using uPA/PAI-1. The comparison of the intrinsic subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, basal-like) based on Prosigna® assay with the risk groups of uPA/PAI-1 showed only poor correlation. A 5-year follow-up with the endpoints ipsilateral recurrence, contralateral recurrence, distant metastasis, and death could be obtained in 67% (28/42) of the initially included patients. In two of these cases, one of these events occurred. The risk stratification of uPA/PAI-1 and Prosigna® did not match in these tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In luminal EBC, there is only limited concordance between risk group classification according to the Prosigna®-ROR, Prosigna®-luminal subtypes, and risk classification by uPA/PAI-1. Risk classification by uPA/PAI-1 compared to the Prosigna® assay resulted in a larger high-risk group with a clear recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX). A larger study population in a prospective setting and more detailed outcome data would be necessary to understand the clinical relevance of the observed discrepancies. Only one evidence-based guideline-recommended prognostic test should be used in a
背景:雌激素受体阳性(ER+)、her2阴性的早期乳腺癌(EBC)的辅助治疗决策过程通常是不充分的,当基于既定的临床病理参数时。额外的预后测试可以促进这些决定。本文比较了经过验证的侵袭标志物尿激酶纤溶酶原激活物/纤溶酶原激活物抑制剂-1 (uPA/PAI-1)与基于PAM50基因标记的Prosigna®检测。Prosigna®还提供预后风险评估(复发风险,Prosigna®-ROR),将肿瘤负担和固有分子亚型考虑在内。方法:2013年10月至2014年4月,我们从慕尼黑大学(LMU)乳腺中心数据库中选择42例绝经后EBC患者(ER+/HER2-)。在治疗决策的背景下,已对所选患者的新鲜冷冻肿瘤组织进行了uPA/PAI-1检测。对患者的数据进行假名化处理,并使用存档的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋肿瘤样本回顾性地进行Prosigna®检测。2021年3月进行了为期5年的随访。结果:所有患者(n = 42)均为ER+/ her2阴性浸润性乳腺癌。根据Prosigna®,低危肿瘤22例(52.4%),中危肿瘤14例(33.3%),高危肿瘤6例(14.3%)。在22例Prosigna®低危肿瘤中,13例(59.1%)为uPA/PAI-1低危,9例(40.9%)为uPA/PAI-1高危。14例Prosigna®中危肿瘤分为uPA/PAI-1低危6例(42.9%)和uPA/PAI-1高危8例(57.1%)。在使用Prosigna®-ROR分类为高危的6例患者中,使用uPA/PAI-1分类为低危的1例(16.7%),高危的5例(83.3%)。基于Prosigna®检测的固有亚型(luminal A, luminal B, basal-like)与uPA/PAI-1风险组的比较显示相关性较差。在最初纳入的患者中,有67%(28/42)的患者随访5年,终点为同侧复发、对侧复发、远处转移和死亡。在其中两个案例中,其中一个事件发生了。在这些肿瘤中,uPA/PAI-1和Prosigna的风险分层不匹配。结论:在管腔EBC中,根据Prosigna®-ROR、Prosigna®-管腔亚型划分的风险组与uPA/PAI-1划分的风险组之间只有有限的一致性。与Prosigna®相比,uPA/PAI-1的风险分类导致高风险人群增加,明确建议进行辅助化疗(CTX)。为了了解观察到的差异的临床相关性,需要在前瞻性环境中进行更大的研究人群和更详细的结果数据。只有一个基于证据的指南推荐的预后测试应该用于单个患者的CTX决策。
{"title":"Comparison of Prosigna® Assay and Urokinase Plasminogen Activator/Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 Results in Early-Stage Breast Cancer Patients.","authors":"Laura Rickerl, Harald Bartsch, Nadia Harbeck, Daniel Maria Hofmann, Thomas Kolben, Tom Degenhardt, Karl Sotlar, Rachel Wuerstlein","doi":"10.1159/000549807","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000549807","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The decision-making process regarding adjuvant treatment in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative early-stage breast cancer (EBC) is often not sufficient, when based on established clinicopathological parameters. Additional prognostic tests could facilitate these decisions. This paper compares the well-validated invasion marker urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (uPA/PAI-1) with the Prosigna® assay, which is based on the PAM50 gene signature. Prosigna® also provides a prognostic risk assessment (risk of recurrence, Prosigna®-ROR), taking tumor burden and the intrinsic molecular subtype into account.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From October 2013 to April 2014, we selected 42 postmenopausal EBC patients (ER+/HER2-) from the database of the Breast Centre of the University of Munich (LMU). In the context of therapy decision-making, uPA/PAI-1 testing had already been performed on the selected patients' fresh frozen tumor tissue. The patient's data were pseudonymized, and the Prosigna® assay was performed retrospectively using archived Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor samples. A 5-year follow-up was carried out in March 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients (<i>n</i> = 42) had ER+/HER2-negative invasive breast cancers. According to Prosigna®, 22 (52.4%) tumors were classified as low-risk, 14 (33.3%) as intermediate-risk, and 6 (14.3%) as high-risk. Among the 22 Prosigna® low-risk tumors, 13 (59.1%) were classified as uPA/PAI-1 low-risk and 9 (40.9%) were classified as uPA/PAI-1 high-risk. The 14 Prosigna® intermediate-risk tumors divided into 6 (42.9%) uPA/PAI-1 low-risk and 8 (57.1%) uPA/PAI-1 high-risk. Among the 6 patients classified as high-risk using Prosigna®-ROR, one (16.7%) was classified as low-risk and the other 5 (83.3%) as high-risk using uPA/PAI-1. The comparison of the intrinsic subtypes (luminal A, luminal B, basal-like) based on Prosigna® assay with the risk groups of uPA/PAI-1 showed only poor correlation. A 5-year follow-up with the endpoints ipsilateral recurrence, contralateral recurrence, distant metastasis, and death could be obtained in 67% (28/42) of the initially included patients. In two of these cases, one of these events occurred. The risk stratification of uPA/PAI-1 and Prosigna® did not match in these tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In luminal EBC, there is only limited concordance between risk group classification according to the Prosigna®-ROR, Prosigna®-luminal subtypes, and risk classification by uPA/PAI-1. Risk classification by uPA/PAI-1 compared to the Prosigna® assay resulted in a larger high-risk group with a clear recommendation for adjuvant chemotherapy (CTX). A larger study population in a prospective setting and more detailed outcome data would be necessary to understand the clinical relevance of the observed discrepancies. Only one evidence-based guideline-recommended prognostic test should be used in a ","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12826793/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146050450","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Laura L Michel, Manuel Feisst, Verena Thewes, Dirk Jäger, Andreas D Hartkopf, Sara Y Brucker, Sabrina Uhrig, Philipp Ziegler, Matthias W Beckmann, Erik Belleville, Christian Maurer, Peter A Fasching, Katharina Smetanay, Carlo Fremd, Andreas Schneeweiss
Introduction: In recent years, targeted therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have improved significantly. In this analysis, we evaluated overall survival (OS) data of a prospectively documented cohort of 1,000 patients with mBC treated at the NCT Heidelberg from 2014 to 2022.
Patients and methods: Clinical data were prospectively collected and documented in the Prospective Academic Translational Research PRAEGNANT Network. OS was analyzed according to molecular subtype and line of therapy at study entry. We further evaluated the clinical characteristics associated with long-term (>5 years) and short-term (<1 year) survival.
Results: The median age at first diagnosis of metastasis was 57 years. A total of 132 patients (13%) presented with triple-negative, 189 (19%) with HER2 positive, and 609 (61%) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC. Median OS was 31.7 months. The longest median OS was observed in patients with HER2-positive and luminal A-like mBC (42 and 39 months, respectively). Patients with luminal B-like and triple-negative mBC showed significantly shorter OS (21 and 14 months, respectively). In univariable Cox regression analysis, significantly shorter OS was associated with higher tumor grade; negative estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status; triple-negative molecular subtype; use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; and later line of therapy at study entry. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that higher tumor grade, negative ER and HER2 status, triple-negative or luminal B-like tumor biology, and study entry during later lines of therapy were the main risk factors for shorter OS. At 5-year follow-up, 17% of patients were still alive. Long-term survivors (>5 years) were more frequently ER, PR, and HER2 positive, received less often (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and had a longer disease-free interval.
Conclusion: This single-center, real-world analysis of 1,000 mBC patients revealed significant OS differences across molecular subtypes and provided valuable information on prognostic factors. These findings underscore the impact of tumor biology and the need for personalized treatment approaches.
{"title":"Overall Survival in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Real-World Data from 1,000 Patients Treated at the NCT Heidelberg between 2014 and 2022.","authors":"Laura L Michel, Manuel Feisst, Verena Thewes, Dirk Jäger, Andreas D Hartkopf, Sara Y Brucker, Sabrina Uhrig, Philipp Ziegler, Matthias W Beckmann, Erik Belleville, Christian Maurer, Peter A Fasching, Katharina Smetanay, Carlo Fremd, Andreas Schneeweiss","doi":"10.1159/000548610","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548610","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, targeted therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) have improved significantly. In this analysis, we evaluated overall survival (OS) data of a prospectively documented cohort of 1,000 patients with mBC treated at the NCT Heidelberg from 2014 to 2022.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Clinical data were prospectively collected and documented in the Prospective Academic Translational Research PRAEGNANT Network. OS was analyzed according to molecular subtype and line of therapy at study entry. We further evaluated the clinical characteristics associated with long-term (>5 years) and short-term (<1 year) survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age at first diagnosis of metastasis was 57 years. A total of 132 patients (13%) presented with triple-negative, 189 (19%) with HER2 positive, and 609 (61%) with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC. Median OS was 31.7 months. The longest median OS was observed in patients with HER2-positive and luminal A-like mBC (42 and 39 months, respectively). Patients with luminal B-like and triple-negative mBC showed significantly shorter OS (21 and 14 months, respectively). In univariable Cox regression analysis, significantly shorter OS was associated with higher tumor grade; negative estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and HER2 status; triple-negative molecular subtype; use of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy; and later line of therapy at study entry. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that higher tumor grade, negative ER and HER2 status, triple-negative or luminal B-like tumor biology, and study entry during later lines of therapy were the main risk factors for shorter OS. At 5-year follow-up, 17% of patients were still alive. Long-term survivors (>5 years) were more frequently ER, PR, and HER2 positive, received less often (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy, and had a longer disease-free interval.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This single-center, real-world analysis of 1,000 mBC patients revealed significant OS differences across molecular subtypes and provided valuable information on prognostic factors. These findings underscore the impact of tumor biology and the need for personalized treatment approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618037/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539084","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Therese Peter, Konstatin C Koban, Denis Ehrl, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann
Background: Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) combined with periareolar mastopexy aims to optimize oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes. One known complication is postoperative enlargement of the nipple-areola complex (NAC), which may affect patient satisfaction. This study investigates the frequency and extent of NAC changes following BCT and radiotherapy, using both conventional and three-dimensional imaging for objective measurement.
Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 50 women who underwent BCT with periareolar mastopexy and adjuvant radiotherapy between 2019 and 2023. Standardized postoperative assessments were performed ≥6 months after surgery and ≥4 months after radiotherapy. NAC diameters were measured using 3D surface imaging and conventional 2D photographs. Patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the Breast-Q™ BCT module.
Results: A statistically significant enlargement of the NAC was observed on the operated side. Horizontal diameter increased by 4.4 mm (p < 0.001) and vertical diameter by 3.5 mm (p = 0.006) compared to the contralateral breast. Similar trends were confirmed in 2D images. Postoperative Breast-Q™ scores showed high satisfaction with the nipple (mean: 73 ± 23) and generally favorable ratings in psychosocial and physical well-being.
Conclusion: NAC enlargement is a measurable postoperative change following periareolar mastopexy in the context of BCT and radiotherapy. These findings highlight the relevance of realistic preoperative counseling and planning. While 3D imaging was used exclusively postoperatively, it offers a reproducible tool for outcome evaluation. Future studies should aim to include preoperative baseline data and prospective quality-of-life assessments.
背景:保乳治疗(BCT)联合乳晕周围乳房切除术旨在优化肿瘤安全性和美观效果。一个已知的并发症是术后乳头乳晕复合体(NAC)的扩大,这可能会影响患者的满意度。本研究探讨了BCT和放疗后NAC改变的频率和程度,使用常规和三维成像进行客观测量。方法:本回顾性单中心研究纳入了2019年至2023年间接受BCT联合乳晕周围乳房切除术和辅助放疗的50名女性。术后≥6个月和放疗后≥4个月进行标准化术后评估。采用三维表面成像和常规二维照片测量NAC直径。使用Breast-Q™BCT模块评估患者报告的满意度。结果:手术侧NAC增大,有统计学意义。与对侧乳房相比,水平直径增加4.4 mm (p < 0.001),垂直直径增加3.5 mm (p = 0.006)。2D图像也证实了类似的趋势。术后Breast-Q™评分显示,患者对乳头的满意度较高(平均:73±23),在心理社会和身体健康方面的评分普遍较好。结论:乳晕周围乳房切除术后,在BCT和放疗的背景下,NAC增大是可测量的术后变化。这些发现强调了现实的术前咨询和计划的相关性。虽然3D成像仅用于术后,但它提供了一种可重复的结果评估工具。未来的研究应包括术前基线数据和前瞻性生活质量评估。
{"title":"Macroareolar Changes following Periareolar Mastopexy: A Postoperative Assessment.","authors":"Therese Peter, Konstatin C Koban, Denis Ehrl, Nadia Harbeck, Steffen Kahlert, Carolin Luczak, Johannes Schmid, Rachel Wuerstlein, Friederike Hagemann","doi":"10.1159/000548681","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548681","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast-conserving therapy (BCT) combined with periareolar mastopexy aims to optimize oncological safety and aesthetic outcomes. One known complication is postoperative enlargement of the nipple-areola complex (NAC), which may affect patient satisfaction. This study investigates the frequency and extent of NAC changes following BCT and radiotherapy, using both conventional and three-dimensional imaging for objective measurement.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective single-center study included 50 women who underwent BCT with periareolar mastopexy and adjuvant radiotherapy between 2019 and 2023. Standardized postoperative assessments were performed ≥6 months after surgery and ≥4 months after radiotherapy. NAC diameters were measured using 3D surface imaging and conventional 2D photographs. Patient-reported satisfaction was assessed using the Breast-Q™ BCT module.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A statistically significant enlargement of the NAC was observed on the operated side. Horizontal diameter increased by 4.4 mm (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and vertical diameter by 3.5 mm (<i>p</i> = 0.006) compared to the contralateral breast. Similar trends were confirmed in 2D images. Postoperative Breast-Q™ scores showed high satisfaction with the nipple (mean: 73 ± 23) and generally favorable ratings in psychosocial and physical well-being.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NAC enlargement is a measurable postoperative change following periareolar mastopexy in the context of BCT and radiotherapy. These findings highlight the relevance of realistic preoperative counseling and planning. While 3D imaging was used exclusively postoperatively, it offers a reproducible tool for outcome evaluation. Future studies should aim to include preoperative baseline data and prospective quality-of-life assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618041/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539035","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-10-01Epub Date: 2025-05-19DOI: 10.1159/000546482
Muharrem Oner, Kefah Mokbel
{"title":"Magnetic Marker Artefacts on Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Localization Precision: Considerations for Targeted Axillary Dissection after Neoadjuvant Therapy.","authors":"Muharrem Oner, Kefah Mokbel","doi":"10.1159/000546482","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546482","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":"20 5","pages":"375-377"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12536999/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145343599","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Mustafa Karaagac, Sedat Carkit, Muharrem Enes Celik, Mustafa Gok, Abdullah Bahadir Oz, Alper Celal Akcan
Background: Breast papillary lesions are uncommon but clinically important due to their potential for histological upgrade. This study aimed to determine the factors that may influence histopathological upgrade in breast papillary lesions.
Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of female patients who underwent surgery for papillary lesions at Erciyes University Medical Faculty Hospital from 2010 onward. Upgrade was defined as a benign/low-risk lesion on biopsy found to be high risk or malignant after excision; downgrade referred to the opposite scenario. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (chi-square test, p < 0.05). Associations were investigated between histopathological shift and variables including age, menopausal status, comorbidities, family history, palpable mass, symptom type, lesion laterality and quadrant, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category, microcalcification, breast density, echogenicity, lesion structure, contour, and biopsy method.
Results: Among 199 patients (median age: 53 years), 46 (23.1%) experienced histopathological upgrade and 13 (6.5%) had a downgrade. Upgrade was significantly associated with menopausal status (p = 0.029), hypertension (p = 0.014), lesion laterality (p = 0.028), and presence of a palpable mass (p = 0.045). Downgrade was significantly related to symptom type (p = 0.028) and presence of microcalcifications (p = 0.033). While BI-RADS category was significantly associated with upgrade (p = 0.035), it did not influence downgrade (p = 0.492). Lesion size, biopsy technique, breast density, echogenicity, lesion structure, and contour showed no significant effect on upgrade or downgrade outcomes (p > 0.05).
Conclusions: In breast papillary lesions, menopause, certain comorbidities, and specific radiological factors (such as BI-RADS category and calcifications) may increase the risk of histopathological transition. These findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing and managing intraductal papillomas. Larger scale studies could further refine risk stratification, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries while facilitating earlier identification of high-risk patients.
{"title":"Investigation of Factors Affecting Histopathological Upgrade in Breast Papillary Lesions: A Single-Center Study.","authors":"Mustafa Karaagac, Sedat Carkit, Muharrem Enes Celik, Mustafa Gok, Abdullah Bahadir Oz, Alper Celal Akcan","doi":"10.1159/000548105","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548105","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast papillary lesions are uncommon but clinically important due to their potential for histological upgrade. This study aimed to determine the factors that may influence histopathological upgrade in breast papillary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted of female patients who underwent surgery for papillary lesions at Erciyes University Medical Faculty Hospital from 2010 onward. Upgrade was defined as a benign/low-risk lesion on biopsy found to be high risk or malignant after excision; downgrade referred to the opposite scenario. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS 22.0 (chi-square test, <i>p</i> < 0.05). Associations were investigated between histopathological shift and variables including age, menopausal status, comorbidities, family history, palpable mass, symptom type, lesion laterality and quadrant, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category, microcalcification, breast density, echogenicity, lesion structure, contour, and biopsy method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 199 patients (median age: 53 years), 46 (23.1%) experienced histopathological upgrade and 13 (6.5%) had a downgrade. Upgrade was significantly associated with menopausal status (<i>p</i> = 0.029), hypertension (<i>p</i> = 0.014), lesion laterality (<i>p</i> = 0.028), and presence of a palpable mass (<i>p</i> = 0.045). Downgrade was significantly related to symptom type (<i>p</i> = 0.028) and presence of microcalcifications (<i>p</i> = 0.033). While BI-RADS category was significantly associated with upgrade (<i>p</i> = 0.035), it did not influence downgrade (<i>p</i> = 0.492). Lesion size, biopsy technique, breast density, echogenicity, lesion structure, and contour showed no significant effect on upgrade or downgrade outcomes (<i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In breast papillary lesions, menopause, certain comorbidities, and specific radiological factors (such as BI-RADS category and calcifications) may increase the risk of histopathological transition. These findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach in diagnosing and managing intraductal papillomas. Larger scale studies could further refine risk stratification, potentially reducing unnecessary surgeries while facilitating earlier identification of high-risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618036/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539079","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Introduction: Breast cancer and mastitis significantly impact women's health and their infants' wellbeing. The advent of metagenomic sequencing technology has opened new avenues to explore the relationships between mammary microbiomes and these diseases. Despite recent extensive studies, detailed understanding of the mammary microbiome-disease relationships remains incomplete.
Methods and results: Here, we apply the Specificity and Specificity Diversity framework (Ma 2024, BMC Biology) to identify unique/enriched species (US/ES) associated with mastitis, breast cancer, or their healthy controls. The US/ES lists contain potential biomarkers and offer fresh insights into the intricacies of mastitis etiology and the relationship between breast tissue microbiomes and breast cancer.
Conclusions: (i) The dynamic balance between coexisting alliances of beneficial microbes and harmful microbes (including opportunistic pathogens) holds key to understanding mastitis etiology. (ii) Intra-tumor microbes may serve multiple roles - as oncogenic microbes, neutral bystanders, or tumor suppressors, and their dynamic balance can influence breast cancer onset and progression. (iii) Significant challenges remain in developing effective probiotics, prebiotics and infant formulas due to complex entanglements between beneficial and harmful microbes. This complexity suggests that broad-spectrum or one-size-fits-all probiotic approaches may prove inadequate, pointing instead to the need for personalized prebiotic/probiotic/infant-formula solutions to restore and maintain healthy mammary microbiomes.
{"title":"Microbial Biomarkers of Breast Tumor and Mastitis: Deciphering the Delicate Balance between Potentially \"Evil\" and \"Benign\" Alliances in Mammary Microbiomes.","authors":"Zhanshan Sam Ma","doi":"10.1159/000548037","DOIUrl":"10.1159/000548037","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast cancer and mastitis significantly impact women's health and their infants' wellbeing. The advent of metagenomic sequencing technology has opened new avenues to explore the relationships between mammary microbiomes and these diseases. Despite recent extensive studies, detailed understanding of the mammary microbiome-disease relationships remains incomplete.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Here, we apply the Specificity and Specificity Diversity framework (Ma 2024, BMC Biology) to identify unique/enriched species (US/ES) associated with mastitis, breast cancer, or their healthy controls. The US/ES lists contain potential biomarkers and offer fresh insights into the intricacies of mastitis etiology and the relationship between breast tissue microbiomes and breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>(i) The dynamic balance between coexisting alliances of beneficial microbes and harmful microbes (including opportunistic pathogens) holds key to understanding mastitis etiology. (ii) Intra-tumor microbes may serve multiple roles - as oncogenic microbes, neutral bystanders, or tumor suppressors, and their dynamic balance can influence breast cancer onset and progression. (iii) Significant challenges remain in developing effective probiotics, prebiotics and infant formulas due to complex entanglements between beneficial and harmful microbes. This complexity suggests that broad-spectrum or one-size-fits-all probiotic approaches may prove inadequate, pointing instead to the need for personalized prebiotic/probiotic/infant-formula solutions to restore and maintain healthy mammary microbiomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9310,"journal":{"name":"Breast Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12618040/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145539046","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}