A Warm Environment Reduces Exogenous Glucose Oxidation and Endurance Performance during Cycling with Facing Airflow.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1249/MSS.0000000000003632
Kirsty M Reynolds, Mark P Funnell, Adam J Collins, Stephen A Mears, Jamie N Pugh, Lewis J James
{"title":"A Warm Environment Reduces Exogenous Glucose Oxidation and Endurance Performance during Cycling with Facing Airflow.","authors":"Kirsty M Reynolds, Mark P Funnell, Adam J Collins, Stephen A Mears, Jamie N Pugh, Lewis J James","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exercise in warm environments increases thermal/cardiovascular strain and decreases gastrointestinal (GI) integrity and endurance performance. However, laboratory-based studies have provided little to/no facing airflow, potentially exacerbating these effects, particularly for cycling, where convective cooling may be a major contributor to thermal balance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the effect of cycling in a warm vs temperate environment with sufficient facing airflow on exogenous glucose use, performance, and GI responses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten trained male cyclists/triathletes (36 ± 6 y; 55 ± 6 mL/kg/min) completed V̇O2peak and familiarisation trials, and two experimental trials in 19 °C (TEMP) and 32 °C (WARM). Experimental trials involved 2 h cycling at ~50% Wpeak (preload) and an ~15 min time trial (TT) with fan-provided airflow covering the cyclist (preload: ~29 km/h, TT: ~35 km/h). A glucose drink containing [U-13C]-glucose was consumed every 20 min during the preload (72 g/h).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Average 40-120 min (TEMP 0.56 ± 0.13 g/min; WARM 0.48 ± 0.12 g/min; 15%; P = 0.015) and peak (TEMP 0.79 ± 0.18 g/min; WARM 0.68 ± 0.14 g/min; 14%; P = 0.008) exogenous glucose oxidation were reduced in WARM. TT performance was 15% slower in WARM (TEMP 819 ± 47 s; WARM 961 ± 130 s; P = 0.002). GI temperature (P = 0.007), heart rate (P < 0.001), and RPE (P = 0.046) were greater during WARM. GI comfort (P = 0.659) and Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein (IFABP) (P = 0.094) were not different between trials.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These data demonstrate that ability to use glucose provided in drinks was impaired during prolonged cycling in WARM. WARM ambient conditions impaired laboratory-based cycling performance, even with facing airflow approximating outdoor conditions, likely via impairments of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and metabolic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003632","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Exercise in warm environments increases thermal/cardiovascular strain and decreases gastrointestinal (GI) integrity and endurance performance. However, laboratory-based studies have provided little to/no facing airflow, potentially exacerbating these effects, particularly for cycling, where convective cooling may be a major contributor to thermal balance.

Purpose: This study investigated the effect of cycling in a warm vs temperate environment with sufficient facing airflow on exogenous glucose use, performance, and GI responses.

Methods: Ten trained male cyclists/triathletes (36 ± 6 y; 55 ± 6 mL/kg/min) completed V̇O2peak and familiarisation trials, and two experimental trials in 19 °C (TEMP) and 32 °C (WARM). Experimental trials involved 2 h cycling at ~50% Wpeak (preload) and an ~15 min time trial (TT) with fan-provided airflow covering the cyclist (preload: ~29 km/h, TT: ~35 km/h). A glucose drink containing [U-13C]-glucose was consumed every 20 min during the preload (72 g/h).

Results: Average 40-120 min (TEMP 0.56 ± 0.13 g/min; WARM 0.48 ± 0.12 g/min; 15%; P = 0.015) and peak (TEMP 0.79 ± 0.18 g/min; WARM 0.68 ± 0.14 g/min; 14%; P = 0.008) exogenous glucose oxidation were reduced in WARM. TT performance was 15% slower in WARM (TEMP 819 ± 47 s; WARM 961 ± 130 s; P = 0.002). GI temperature (P = 0.007), heart rate (P < 0.001), and RPE (P = 0.046) were greater during WARM. GI comfort (P = 0.659) and Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein (IFABP) (P = 0.094) were not different between trials.

Conclusions: These data demonstrate that ability to use glucose provided in drinks was impaired during prolonged cycling in WARM. WARM ambient conditions impaired laboratory-based cycling performance, even with facing airflow approximating outdoor conditions, likely via impairments of thermoregulatory, cardiovascular, and metabolic function.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面对气流骑车时,温暖的环境可降低外源性葡萄糖氧化和耐力表现。
在温暖的环境中锻炼会增加热/心血管压力,降低胃肠道(GI)的完整性和耐力表现。然而,基于实验室的研究几乎没有提供正面气流,这可能会加剧这些影响,特别是在循环过程中,对流冷却可能是热平衡的主要贡献者。目的:本研究探讨了在温暖和温和的环境中骑行对外源性葡萄糖的使用、性能和GI反应的影响。方法:10名训练有素的男性自行车/铁人三项运动员(36±6岁;(55±6 mL/kg/min)完成了V (o2)峰值和熟悉试验,并在19°C (TEMP)和32°C (WARM)下进行了两个实验试验。实验包括以50%峰值(预负荷)骑行2小时,以及在风扇提供气流覆盖骑行者的情况下骑行15分钟(预负荷:~29 km/h,预负荷:~35 km/h)。预负荷期间每20分钟饮用含[U-13C]-葡萄糖的葡萄糖饮料(72 g/h)。结果:平均40-120 min (TEMP 0.56±0.13 g/min;WARM 0.48±0.12 g/min;15%;P = 0.015)和峰值(TEMP 0.79±0.18 g/min;WARM 0.68±0.14 g/min;14%;P = 0.008), WARM组外源性葡萄糖氧化降低。在WARM(温度819±47 s;961±130秒;P = 0.002)。GI温度(P = 0.007)、心率(P < 0.001)和RPE (P = 0.046)均高于WARM组。GI舒适度(P = 0.659)和肠脂肪酸结合蛋白(IFABP) (P = 0.094)在试验间无差异。结论:这些数据表明,在WARM的长时间循环中,利用饮料中提供的葡萄糖的能力受到损害。即使面对接近室外的气流,温暖的环境条件也会损害实验室的循环性能,这可能是通过损害体温调节、心血管和代谢功能来实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
期刊最新文献
Cardiorespiratory Responses to Exercise in Hypobaric versus Normobaric Hypoxia: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Crossover Study. Developmental Patterns of Objectively Measured Motor Competence and Musculoskeletal Fitness among Finnish Adolescents. Hamstrings Are Stretched More and Faster during Accelerative Running Compared to Speed-Matched Constant-Speed Running. A Novel Low-Impact Resistance Exercise Program Increases Strength and Balance in Females Irrespective of Menopause Status. Investigating the Role of Exercise Pattern in Acute Cardiovagal Recovery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1