Neurobiology, psychotherapeutic interventions, and emerging therapies in addiction: a systematic review.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE Journal of Addictive Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1080/10550887.2024.2440184
Christopher Lomas
{"title":"Neurobiology, psychotherapeutic interventions, and emerging therapies in addiction: a systematic review.","authors":"Christopher Lomas","doi":"10.1080/10550887.2024.2440184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a major challenge in psychiatric treatment, with significant relapse rates despite various psychotherapeutic interventions. This systematic review explores the neurobiological underpinnings of addiction and examines the efficacy of psychotherapies, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP), and emerging therapies in treating SUDs. Additionally, the study assesses how emerging biomarkers and neuroimaging data could enhance therapeutic outcomes by guiding personalized treatments. Neurobiological markers, such as prefrontal-limbic connectivity, mesolimbic dopaminergic dysregulation, and glutamate transmission deficits, are shown to significantly influence treatment efficacy. For example, prefrontal cortex hypoactivity and amygdala hyperactivity correlate with poor impulse control and emotional regulation, making these individuals more responsive to CBT and EMDR. Similarly, dopaminergic dysfunction in the mesolimbic pathway is closely tied to reward-seeking behavior where Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) may offer therapeutic benefits. Epigenetic modifications, primarily those affecting the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), highlight the role of stress in relapse suggesting that trauma-focused therapies can be effective for individuals with high stress vulnerability. This review finds that integrating neurobiological insights with clinically validated psychometric assessments could significantly improve treatment stratification. Future research should focus on aligning diagnostic systems, such as the DSM-5, with neurobiological markers and psychological tells to facilitate more precise and personalized interventions, potentially transforming addiction treatment outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":47493,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addictive Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10550887.2024.2440184","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Substance use disorders (SUDs) represent a major challenge in psychiatric treatment, with significant relapse rates despite various psychotherapeutic interventions. This systematic review explores the neurobiological underpinnings of addiction and examines the efficacy of psychotherapies, such as Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR), Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention (MBRP), and emerging therapies in treating SUDs. Additionally, the study assesses how emerging biomarkers and neuroimaging data could enhance therapeutic outcomes by guiding personalized treatments. Neurobiological markers, such as prefrontal-limbic connectivity, mesolimbic dopaminergic dysregulation, and glutamate transmission deficits, are shown to significantly influence treatment efficacy. For example, prefrontal cortex hypoactivity and amygdala hyperactivity correlate with poor impulse control and emotional regulation, making these individuals more responsive to CBT and EMDR. Similarly, dopaminergic dysfunction in the mesolimbic pathway is closely tied to reward-seeking behavior where Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) may offer therapeutic benefits. Epigenetic modifications, primarily those affecting the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), highlight the role of stress in relapse suggesting that trauma-focused therapies can be effective for individuals with high stress vulnerability. This review finds that integrating neurobiological insights with clinically validated psychometric assessments could significantly improve treatment stratification. Future research should focus on aligning diagnostic systems, such as the DSM-5, with neurobiological markers and psychological tells to facilitate more precise and personalized interventions, potentially transforming addiction treatment outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成瘾的神经生物学、心理治疗干预和新兴疗法:系统综述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of Addictive Diseases is an essential, comprehensive resource covering the full range of addictions for today"s addiction professional. This in-depth, practical journal helps you stay on top of the vital issues and the clinical skills necessary to ensure effective practice. The latest research, treatments, and public policy issues in addiction medicine are presented in a fully integrated, multi-specialty perspective. Top researchers and respected leaders in addiction issues share their knowledge and insights to keep you up-to-date on the most important research and practical applications.
期刊最新文献
Caring for patients with substance use disorders: a qualitative investigation of difficulties encountered by hospital-based clinicians. Central sensitization in alcohol use disorder: correlates of pain, addiction and health-related quality of life. Applying the theory of planned behavior to predict online addiction treatment intention. 10-year retention of a comprehensive treatment model of buprenorphine for opioid use disorder. Functional connectivity alterations in individuals with gaming disorder assessed by functional magnetic resonance imaging: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1