Exploring the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for health professions educators through faculty development.

IF 3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Advances in Health Sciences Education Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s10459-024-10405-4
Mahbub Sarkar, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli, Nicoleta Maynard, Michelle D Lazarus, Caroline Wright, Susie Ho, Dragan Ilic, Paul J White, Amanda Berry
{"title":"Exploring the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for health professions educators through faculty development.","authors":"Mahbub Sarkar, Laura Gutierrez-Bucheli, Nicoleta Maynard, Michelle D Lazarus, Caroline Wright, Susie Ho, Dragan Ilic, Paul J White, Amanda Berry","doi":"10.1007/s10459-024-10405-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Research on how pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)-informed faculty development initiatives can support PCK development among health professions educators is limited. Given the positive impact of PCK on enhancing professional knowledge for effective teaching, this study investigates the learning process of health professions educators in developing their PCK through a faculty development initiative, supported by the Content Representation (CoRe) tool. Using a qualitative approach, grounded in social constructionism, the study engaged eight educators from diverse health disciplines at an Australian university. Participants collaborated in developing and refining PCK-infused lesson plans using the CoRe tool. Several workshops, writing sessions, feedback sharing, and an online community of practice facilitated PCK-related discussion, resource sharing, and networking. Data collection comprised two rounds of individual interviews, written reflections, and lesson planning artefacts. Data were analysed using team-based thematic framework analysis. Four themes were identified: 1) articulating teaching purposes, (2) understanding students' learning needs, (3) promoting reflection on teaching practice, and (4) challenges in adapting and implementing the CoRe tool. The findings highlight the critical role of faculty development programs and advocate for the use of the CoRe tool for articulating and scaffolding PCK for both experienced and novice educators. The collaborative environment facilitated peer feedback and knowledge sharing, thus fostering a collective understanding of PCK and affirming its relevance within the broader health professions education community.</p>","PeriodicalId":50959,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-024-10405-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Research on how pedagogical content knowledge (PCK)-informed faculty development initiatives can support PCK development among health professions educators is limited. Given the positive impact of PCK on enhancing professional knowledge for effective teaching, this study investigates the learning process of health professions educators in developing their PCK through a faculty development initiative, supported by the Content Representation (CoRe) tool. Using a qualitative approach, grounded in social constructionism, the study engaged eight educators from diverse health disciplines at an Australian university. Participants collaborated in developing and refining PCK-infused lesson plans using the CoRe tool. Several workshops, writing sessions, feedback sharing, and an online community of practice facilitated PCK-related discussion, resource sharing, and networking. Data collection comprised two rounds of individual interviews, written reflections, and lesson planning artefacts. Data were analysed using team-based thematic framework analysis. Four themes were identified: 1) articulating teaching purposes, (2) understanding students' learning needs, (3) promoting reflection on teaching practice, and (4) challenges in adapting and implementing the CoRe tool. The findings highlight the critical role of faculty development programs and advocate for the use of the CoRe tool for articulating and scaffolding PCK for both experienced and novice educators. The collaborative environment facilitated peer feedback and knowledge sharing, thus fostering a collective understanding of PCK and affirming its relevance within the broader health professions education community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Health Sciences Education is a forum for scholarly and state-of-the art research into all aspects of health sciences education. It will publish empirical studies as well as discussions of theoretical issues and practical implications. The primary focus of the Journal is linking theory to practice, thus priority will be given to papers that have a sound theoretical basis and strong methodology.
期刊最新文献
Big data analysis: examination of the relationship between candidates' sociodemographic characteristics and performance in the UK's Membership of the Royal College of Physicians Part 1 examination. The evolution of academic advisor and resident dyadic coaching relationships: a two-year longitudinal qualitative study. Exploring the development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) for health professions educators through faculty development. Unravelling the art of developing skilled communication: a longitudinal qualitative research study in general practice training. Can all roads lead to competency? School levels effects in Licensing examinations scores.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1