Emma Salt , Mo Khalid , Danielle Van Der Windt , Jonathan Hill
{"title":"Are clinical decision support systems seen as helpful to First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) working in musculoskeletal health?","authors":"Emma Salt , Mo Khalid , Danielle Van Der Windt , Jonathan Hill","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There is increasing burden on musculoskeletal (MSK) First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) working in primary care. One possible solution is to use digital technologies such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The primary objective of this study was to understand the potential for MSK FCPs to use a CDSS to support their practice in the United Kingdom.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>An exploratory sequential mixed methods design, using a cross sectional survey questionnaire and a subsequent focus group.</div><div>Following ethical approval responders were recruited via professional networks to complete an online survey. A subsequent focus group enabled an in-depth exploration of survey results. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey data and thematic analysis with normalisation process theory used to describe findings.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A snowball sampling method was used to invite MSK FCPs to complete the survey, using email, adverts and social media. The questionnaire captured responders’ demographic and professional practice characteristics, their knowledge and use of CDSS and their views and experiences regarding CDSS in MSK practice.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>There were 75 responders to the survey and six participants in the focus group. The majority of responders 67% (<em>n</em> = 50/75) reported to be in favour of integrating a CDSS into their practice. Three themes were: 1) ensuring CDSS address efficiency concerns, 2) using CDSS to reduce unwarranted variation in practice, and 3) ensuring CDSS sustainability.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>CDSSs have potential value for FCPs working in MSK primary care settings. Eight summary recommendations advise future developments of CDSS for FCPs working in MSK primary care practice.</div></div><div><h3><strong>Contribution of the Paper</strong></h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>This is the first known study evaluating the usefulness of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for musculoskeletal (MSK) First Contact Practitioners (FCPs).</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>CDSS have potential value for MSK FCPs providing they are integrated into existing digital note systems and save clinic consultation time.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Eight recommendations advise future integration of CDSS into MSK FCP practice.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101445"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0031940624004541","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There is increasing burden on musculoskeletal (MSK) First Contact Practitioners (FCPs) working in primary care. One possible solution is to use digital technologies such as clinical decision support systems (CDSS). The primary objective of this study was to understand the potential for MSK FCPs to use a CDSS to support their practice in the United Kingdom.
Design
An exploratory sequential mixed methods design, using a cross sectional survey questionnaire and a subsequent focus group.
Following ethical approval responders were recruited via professional networks to complete an online survey. A subsequent focus group enabled an in-depth exploration of survey results. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise survey data and thematic analysis with normalisation process theory used to describe findings.
Methods
A snowball sampling method was used to invite MSK FCPs to complete the survey, using email, adverts and social media. The questionnaire captured responders’ demographic and professional practice characteristics, their knowledge and use of CDSS and their views and experiences regarding CDSS in MSK practice.
Results
There were 75 responders to the survey and six participants in the focus group. The majority of responders 67% (n = 50/75) reported to be in favour of integrating a CDSS into their practice. Three themes were: 1) ensuring CDSS address efficiency concerns, 2) using CDSS to reduce unwarranted variation in practice, and 3) ensuring CDSS sustainability.
Conclusions
CDSSs have potential value for FCPs working in MSK primary care settings. Eight summary recommendations advise future developments of CDSS for FCPs working in MSK primary care practice.
Contribution of the Paper
•
This is the first known study evaluating the usefulness of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) for musculoskeletal (MSK) First Contact Practitioners (FCPs).
•
CDSS have potential value for MSK FCPs providing they are integrated into existing digital note systems and save clinic consultation time.
•
Eight recommendations advise future integration of CDSS into MSK FCP practice.
期刊介绍:
Physiotherapy aims to publish original research and facilitate continuing professional development for physiotherapists and other health professions worldwide. Dedicated to the advancement of physiotherapy through publication of research and scholarly work concerned with, but not limited to, its scientific basis and clinical application, education of practitioners, management of services and policy.
We are pleased to receive articles reporting original scientific research, systematic reviews or meta-analyses, theoretical or debate articles, brief reports and technical reports. All papers should demonstrate methodological rigour.