首页 > 最新文献

Physiotherapy最新文献

英文 中文
Editors
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9406(25)00295-0
{"title":"Editors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0031-9406(25)00295-0","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0031-9406(25)00295-0","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101757"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143152970","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
List of Reviewers, 2024
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-01-27 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101766
{"title":"List of Reviewers, 2024","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101766","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101766","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101766"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143152983","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Best practice recommendations for physiotherapists providing telerehabilitation to First Nations people: a modified Delphi study
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-01-17 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101464
Débora Petry Moecke , Travis Holyk , Kristin L. Campbell , Kendall Ho , Pat G. Camp
<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study aimed to develop best practice recommendations for physiotherapists providing telerehabilitation to First Nations people.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>Modified Delphi study.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Eighteen experts from four groups were selected: (a) physiotherapists who provide telerehabilitation to First Nations people, (b) Carrier Sekani Family Services leaders (CSFS, First Nations-led health organization/research partners), (c) telehealth experts from British Columbia (BC), Canada, and (d) First Nations individuals (end users) with experience in telerehabilitation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Panelists rated recommendations on telehealth best practices in two rounds using an online questionnaire. Recommendations were synthesized from a scoping review and two qualitative studies. Each statement was rated on a four-point Likert scale indicating whether it was essential, useful, not useful, or unnecessary for inclusion in the best practices. Statements endorsed by ≥80% of panel members were considered for inclusion in the final document.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Following the Delphi process, 77 recommendations covering foundational components, information technology utilization, professional expertise, therapeutic relationships, cultural safety, and the telehealth visit were validated for inclusion in the policy document. Participants also validated the methodology.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The recommendations offer a valuable resource for continuing education and professional development, empowering physiotherapists to enhance their skills and competencies in delivering culturally competent telerehabilitation to the First Nations population. The adoption of these best practices ensures that First Nations people are getting the best standard of care, potentially enhancing uptake and experiences with telehealth. It also enables healthcare organizations and policymakers to monitor adherence to established standards and identify areas for improvement.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>This paper provides best practice recommendations for physiotherapists delivering telerehabilitation to First Nations people, addressing unique cultural aspects and virtual relationship building.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The study offers physiotherapists expert guidance to enhance the quality and cultural appropriateness of telerehabilitation services for First Nations populations.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The recommendations serve as a valuable resource for continuing education and professional development, enabling physiotherapists to deliver culturally competent and effective care.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>These best practices facilitate accountability and quality assurance, helping healthcare organizations and policymakers monitor adherence to standa
{"title":"Best practice recommendations for physiotherapists providing telerehabilitation to First Nations people: a modified Delphi study","authors":"Débora Petry Moecke ,&nbsp;Travis Holyk ,&nbsp;Kristin L. Campbell ,&nbsp;Kendall Ho ,&nbsp;Pat G. Camp","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101464","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101464","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Objectives&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;This study aimed to develop best practice recommendations for physiotherapists providing telerehabilitation to First Nations people.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Design&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Modified Delphi study.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Participants&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Eighteen experts from four groups were selected: (a) physiotherapists who provide telerehabilitation to First Nations people, (b) Carrier Sekani Family Services leaders (CSFS, First Nations-led health organization/research partners), (c) telehealth experts from British Columbia (BC), Canada, and (d) First Nations individuals (end users) with experience in telerehabilitation.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Methods&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Panelists rated recommendations on telehealth best practices in two rounds using an online questionnaire. Recommendations were synthesized from a scoping review and two qualitative studies. Each statement was rated on a four-point Likert scale indicating whether it was essential, useful, not useful, or unnecessary for inclusion in the best practices. Statements endorsed by ≥80% of panel members were considered for inclusion in the final document.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Results&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;Following the Delphi process, 77 recommendations covering foundational components, information technology utilization, professional expertise, therapeutic relationships, cultural safety, and the telehealth visit were validated for inclusion in the policy document. Participants also validated the methodology.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Conclusion&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;The recommendations offer a valuable resource for continuing education and professional development, empowering physiotherapists to enhance their skills and competencies in delivering culturally competent telerehabilitation to the First Nations population. The adoption of these best practices ensures that First Nations people are getting the best standard of care, potentially enhancing uptake and experiences with telehealth. It also enables healthcare organizations and policymakers to monitor adherence to established standards and identify areas for improvement.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;h3&gt;Contribution of the Paper&lt;/h3&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;•&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;div&gt;This paper provides best practice recommendations for physiotherapists delivering telerehabilitation to First Nations people, addressing unique cultural aspects and virtual relationship building.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;•&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;div&gt;The study offers physiotherapists expert guidance to enhance the quality and cultural appropriateness of telerehabilitation services for First Nations populations.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;•&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;div&gt;The recommendations serve as a valuable resource for continuing education and professional development, enabling physiotherapists to deliver culturally competent and effective care.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;&lt;span&gt;•&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;div&gt;These best practices facilitate accountability and quality assurance, helping healthcare organizations and policymakers monitor adherence to standa","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 101464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143217209","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Employing a coaching model of supervision during physiotherapy placements: charting the learner experience in England
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463
Sarah Smith , Simon Godley , Adele Anderson , Paul K. Miller

Objectives

The UK government has moved to increase pre-qualification training places across all Allied Health Professions by 50%, without any reduction in quality of education. Universities and healthcare teams are therefore being asked to change their ways of working and consider alternative practice supervision models during placements. This study explores the experiences of pre-qualifying physiotherapy learners involved in a trial of one such model, a coaching and peer-learning approach. The work described assesses its facility as an augmentation to the traditional one-to-one clinical supervision model.

Design

A qualitative-thematic approach using semi-structured interviews was employed. Detailed, open-ended interviews were conducted in order to ascertain the nuanced experiences of participants involved in the trial.

Setting

An intervention in multiple sites (both hospital inpatient and community care) within a single NHS trust, administered by a single UK university.

Participants

Participants Seventeen pre-qualifying participants involved in the trial consented to be interviewed. Of these, 11 were final year undergraduate learners, and 6 were final year postgraduates, of which 12 identified as female and 5 identified as male..

Results

Analysis revealed four interconnected major themes: 1. Teamwork, Camaraderie and Hierarchical Tensions in Peer-Support; 2. Adapting to Leadership and Being Led; 3. Safety Nets versus Supervisors; 4. Fast Starts and Variable Endings in Learning and Experience.

Conclusion and implications

The model was broadly well-received by participants, and ultimately gave rise to greater workplace confidence, with potential impact for capacity, though the nuanced outcomes of the research indicated contingencies around gradual assimilation and group dynamics that should be considered in future development.

Contribution of the Paper

  • The coaching model of placement supervision was broadly well-received among learners, and has facility as a part of the expansion process in physiotherapy workforce development.
  • Freedom from the need for persistent clinical scrutiny can reduce the pressure on learners and also on practice educators.
  • Social dynamics in teams are not an arbitrary contingency but need to be a core feature of the design in any given case.
{"title":"Employing a coaching model of supervision during physiotherapy placements: charting the learner experience in England","authors":"Sarah Smith ,&nbsp;Simon Godley ,&nbsp;Adele Anderson ,&nbsp;Paul K. Miller","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2025.101463","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>The UK government has moved to increase pre-qualification training places across all Allied Health Professions by 50%, without any reduction in quality of education. Universities and healthcare teams are therefore being asked to change their ways of working and consider alternative practice supervision models during placements. This study explores the experiences of pre-qualifying physiotherapy learners involved in a trial of one such model, a coaching and peer-learning approach. The work described assesses its facility as an augmentation to the traditional one-to-one clinical supervision model.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>A qualitative-thematic approach using semi-structured interviews was employed. Detailed, open-ended interviews were conducted in order to ascertain the nuanced experiences of participants involved in the trial.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>An intervention in multiple sites (both hospital inpatient and community care) within a single NHS trust, administered by a single UK university.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants Seventeen pre-qualifying participants involved in the trial consented to be interviewed. Of these, 11 were final year undergraduate learners, and 6 were final year postgraduates, of which 12 identified as female and 5 identified as male..</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Analysis revealed four interconnected major themes: 1. Teamwork, Camaraderie and Hierarchical Tensions in Peer-Support; 2. Adapting to Leadership and Being Led; 3. Safety Nets versus Supervisors; 4. Fast Starts and Variable Endings in Learning and Experience.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion and implications</h3><div>The model was broadly well-received by participants, and ultimately gave rise to greater workplace confidence, with potential impact for capacity, though the nuanced outcomes of the research indicated contingencies around gradual assimilation and group dynamics that should be considered in future development.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>The coaching model of placement supervision was broadly well-received among learners, and has facility as a part of the expansion process in physiotherapy workforce development.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Freedom from the need for persistent clinical scrutiny can reduce the pressure on learners and also on practice educators.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Social dynamics in teams are not an arbitrary contingency but need to be a core feature of the design in any given case.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 101463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143217204","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Corrigendum to “Abstracts from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) 2023 Annual Conference” [Physiotherapy 123(Suppl. 1) (2023) e1–e272]
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-12-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101452
{"title":"Corrigendum to “Abstracts from the Chartered Society of Physiotherapy (CSP) 2023 Annual Conference” [Physiotherapy 123(Suppl. 1) (2023) e1–e272]","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101452","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101452","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101452"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143152974","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability of physiotherapists as primary care practitioners for the care of people with musculoskeletal disorders: a French population-based cross-sectional survey 可接受的物理治疗师作为初级保健从业者的护理与肌肉骨骼疾病的人:法国人口为基础的横断面调查
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-13 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101453
A. Demont , R. Vervaeke , S. Lafrance , F. Desmeules , A. Dumas , A. Bourmaud

Objectives

In France, early access to physiotherapy for people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) depends on prescription and referral by the family physician in the physician-led model of care. The readiness of French people for direct access to physiotherapy is not known. This survey aims to identify the perceptions of French adults regarding physiotherapists' competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs if they were primary care practitioners, confidence in their ability to provide quality care, and satisfaction with the last episode of care for those concerned; and to identify factors associated with these three variables.

Design

French population-based cross-sectional survey.

Participants

A representative sample of the French adult population was surveyed between June 2020 and September 2021.

Outcome measures

Collected variables included previous physiotherapy experience, perception of competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs as primary care practitioners, confidence about quality of care, and self-referral preferences. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with these three variables.

Results

A total of 1000 participants completed the survey; 854 (85%) believed that physiotherapists would be competent primary care practitioners, and 920 (92%) were confident about the quality of care. Most had previously consulted a physiotherapist (n = 823, 82%); of these, 762 (91%) were satisfied with care received.

Conclusion

This large sample of French adults considered physiotherapists as competent to diagnose and treat some MSKDs as primary care practitioners, and that they provided quality care. Further studies should investigate the scope of care, safety, and efficacy of a direct access physiotherapy model.

Contribution of Paper

  • Physiotherapists were considered competent as primary care practitioners.
  • Participants were satisfied with previous physiotherapy received.
  • Our results support the implementation of direct access physiotherapy in France.
在法国,在医生主导的护理模式下,肌肉骨骼疾病(mskd)患者早期获得物理治疗取决于处方和家庭医生的转诊。目前尚不清楚法国人是否愿意直接接受物理治疗。这项调查旨在确定法国成年人对物理治疗师诊断和管理mskd的能力的看法,如果他们是初级保健从业人员,对他们提供高质量护理的能力的信心,以及对有关人员最后一次护理的满意度;并找出与这三个变量相关的因素。设计以法国人口为基础的横断面调查。在2020年6月至2021年9月期间,对法国成年人口的代表性样本进行了调查。结果测量收集的变量包括以前的物理治疗经验、作为初级保健医生诊断和管理mskd的能力感知、对护理质量的信心和自我转诊偏好。进行多变量逻辑回归分析以确定与这三个变量相关的因素。结果共有1000名参与者完成了调查;854名(85%)认为物理治疗师是合格的初级保健从业人员,920名(92%)对护理质量有信心。大多数患者之前曾咨询过物理治疗师(n = 823,82%);其中,762人(91%)对所接受的护理感到满意。结论:这个大样本的法国成年人认为物理治疗师有能力诊断和治疗一些mskd,作为初级保健从业人员,他们提供了高质量的护理。进一步的研究应该调查直接进入物理治疗模式的护理范围、安全性和有效性。•物理治疗师被认为是胜任初级保健从业人员。•参与者对先前接受的物理治疗感到满意。•我们的结果支持在法国实施直接获取物理治疗。
{"title":"Acceptability of physiotherapists as primary care practitioners for the care of people with musculoskeletal disorders: a French population-based cross-sectional survey","authors":"A. Demont ,&nbsp;R. Vervaeke ,&nbsp;S. Lafrance ,&nbsp;F. Desmeules ,&nbsp;A. Dumas ,&nbsp;A. Bourmaud","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101453","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101453","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>In France, early access to physiotherapy for people with musculoskeletal disorders (MSKDs) depends on prescription and referral by the family physician in the physician-led model of care. The readiness of French people for direct access to physiotherapy is not known. This survey aims to identify the perceptions of French adults regarding physiotherapists' competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs if they were primary care practitioners, confidence in their ability to provide quality care, and satisfaction with the last episode of care for those concerned; and to identify factors associated with these three variables.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>French population-based cross-sectional survey.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>A representative sample of the French adult population was surveyed between June 2020 and September 2021.</div></div><div><h3>Outcome measures</h3><div>Collected variables included previous physiotherapy experience, perception of competence to diagnose and manage MSKDs as primary care practitioners, confidence about quality of care, and self-referral preferences. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with these three variables.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 1000 participants completed the survey; 854 (85%) believed that physiotherapists would be competent primary care practitioners, and 920 (92%) were confident about the quality of care. Most had previously consulted a physiotherapist (<em>n</em> = 823, 82%); of these, 762 (91%) were satisfied with care received.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This large sample of French adults considered physiotherapists as competent to diagnose and treat some MSKDs as primary care practitioners, and that they provided quality care. Further studies should investigate the scope of care, safety, and efficacy of a direct access physiotherapy model.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Physiotherapists were considered competent as primary care practitioners.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Participants were satisfied with previous physiotherapy received.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Our results support the implementation of direct access physiotherapy in France.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101453"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142744726","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Acceptability and utility of a broad test battery to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in community-based settings for people experiencing homelessness and addiction–Findings from the LEAP trials 在社区环境中评估无家可归者和成瘾者身体功能和脆弱性的广泛测试电池的可接受性和实用性——LEAP试验的结果。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101449
F. Kennedy , C. Ní Cheallaigh , R. Romero-Ortuno , D. Murray , J. Broderick

Background

Physical function deficits and frailty are commonly reported in people experiencing homelessness and addiction. Typically, geriatric, or general physical performance measures are employed to evaluate these constructs.

Objectives and setting

We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a broad test battery to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in a non-geriatric community-based population of people experiencing homelessness and addiction.

Design and methods

Physical function and the presence of frailty was evaluated using combined data from two linked low-threshold exercise pre-post intervention studies (LEAP-I and II).

Participants

Seventy-four participants attending an open-access day-service centre (18 to 65 years) were evaluated. Participants with acute confusion or behavioural issues, or major medical conditions precluding safe participation were excluded.

Intervention

A broad test battery was performed which evaluated physical functioning and frailty.

Main outcome measures

Outcome measures included were the Short Physical Performance Battery, Single Leg Stance, Chair Stand Test, 10mWT and 2 Minute Walk Tests, limb circumference, dynamometry, Clinical Frailty Scale, SHARE-Frailty Instrument, Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Short Form-12.

Results

Test completion was 100% for all outcomes except pain rating (81% and 79% for LEAP-I and II, respectively), and balance and walking tests (95% and 93% in LEAP-II). A ceiling effect was detected for the Short Physical Performance Battery.

Conclusion

High feasibility of the test batteries was demonstrated. An optimised test battery was proposed based on findings. This has important implications for clinicians working in inclusion health settings.

Clinical Trial Registration Number

Clinical Trials.gov: NCT05700305.

Contribution of the Paper

  • This paper proposes a suitable test battery to enable clinicians to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in people experiencing homelessness and addiction challenges in community settings.
  • There is a paucity of research evaluating outcome measures for this population and no core outcome set has been reported.
  • This test battery would allow the effect of treatment and targeted interventions to be evaluated in this marginalised population.
背景:身体功能缺陷和虚弱是普遍报道的人经历无家可归和成瘾。通常,老年人或一般的物理性能测量被用来评估这些结构。目的和背景:我们旨在研究一种广泛的测试方法的可行性,以评估无家可归和成瘾的非老年社区人群的身体功能和脆弱性。设计和方法:使用两个相关的低阈值运动干预前和干预后研究(LEAP-I和II)的综合数据评估身体功能和虚弱的存在。参与者:74名参加开放式日间服务中心的参与者(18至65岁)进行评估。有严重神志不清或行为问题,或严重健康状况妨碍安全参与的参与者被排除在外。干预:进行了广泛的测试,以评估身体功能和虚弱。主要评价指标包括短体能测试、单腿站立、椅子站立测试、10mWT和2分钟步行测试、肢体围度、动力测量、临床虚弱量表、share -虚弱量表、数值疼痛评定量表和Short Form-12。结果:除了疼痛评分(分别为81%和79%的LEAP-I和II)以及平衡和行走测试(95%和93%的LEAP-II)之外,所有结果的测试完成度均为100%。短物理性能电池检测到天花板效应。结论:试验电池具有较高的可行性。在此基础上,提出了一种优化的试验电池。这对在包容性卫生环境中工作的临床医生具有重要意义。临床试验注册号:Clinical Trials.gov: NCT05700305。论文贡献。
{"title":"Acceptability and utility of a broad test battery to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in community-based settings for people experiencing homelessness and addiction–Findings from the LEAP trials","authors":"F. Kennedy ,&nbsp;C. Ní Cheallaigh ,&nbsp;R. Romero-Ortuno ,&nbsp;D. Murray ,&nbsp;J. Broderick","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101449","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101449","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Physical function deficits and frailty are commonly reported in people experiencing homelessness and addiction. Typically, geriatric, or general physical performance measures are employed to evaluate these constructs.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives and setting</h3><div>We aimed to investigate the feasibility of a broad test battery to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in a non-geriatric community-based population of people experiencing homelessness and addiction.</div></div><div><h3>Design and methods</h3><div>Physical function and the presence of frailty was evaluated using combined data from two linked low-threshold exercise pre-post intervention studies (LEAP-I and II).</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Seventy-four participants attending an open-access day-service centre (18 to 65 years) were evaluated. Participants with acute confusion or behavioural issues, or major medical conditions precluding safe participation were excluded.</div></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><div>A broad test battery was performed which evaluated physical functioning and frailty.</div></div><div><h3>Main outcome measures</h3><div>Outcome measures included were the Short Physical Performance Battery, Single Leg Stance, Chair Stand Test, 10mWT and 2 Minute Walk Tests, limb circumference, dynamometry, Clinical Frailty Scale, SHARE-Frailty Instrument, Numerical Pain Rating Scale and Short Form-12.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Test completion was 100% for all outcomes except pain rating (81% and 79% for LEAP-I and II, respectively), and balance and walking tests (95% and 93% in LEAP-II). A ceiling effect was detected for the Short Physical Performance Battery.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>High feasibility of the test batteries was demonstrated. An optimised test battery was proposed based on findings. This has important implications for clinicians working in inclusion health settings.</div></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration Number</h3><div>Clinical Trials.gov: <span><span>NCT05700305</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>This paper proposes a suitable test battery to enable clinicians to evaluate physical functioning and frailty in people experiencing homelessness and addiction challenges in community settings.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>There is a paucity of research evaluating outcome measures for this population and no core outcome set has been reported.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>This test battery would allow the effect of treatment and targeted interventions to be evaluated in this marginalised population.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101449"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142774698","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Systematic development of a complex intervention: a theory and evidence-based physiotherapist led group intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour following bariatric surgery (PARIS) 复杂干预措施的系统开发:以理论和实证为基础的物理治疗师主导的团体干预措施,旨在增加体育锻炼,减少减肥手术后的久坐行为(PARIS)。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101451
Jennifer James , Wendy Hardeman , Mark Goodall , Helen Eborall , John P.H. Wilding

Objectives

To describe the systematic development of a physiotherapist led group behaviour change intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour in individuals who have undergone bariatric surgery.

Study design

Intervention development including evidence synthesis, qualitative research and mapping of intervention components, using the 2008 MRC framework for complex interventions.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review to identify the evidence for promising interventions and components to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour following bariatric surgery. We also conducted primary qualitative research exploring these behaviours with three key stakeholder groups: patients, clinicians and commissioners. We selected two contemporary behaviour change frameworks to inform intervention development and developed a conceptual matrix in which intervention objectives were defined to inform selection of appropriate behaviour change techniques, proposed mechanisms of action(s), and mode of delivery. We also developed two intervention handbooks for participants and facilitators to support delivery and receipt of the intervention.

Results

We have developed a behaviour change intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour in patients following bariatric surgery. Eight intervention objectives were defined and mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework. We identified what the intervention must be able to do (intervention functions), behaviour change techniques that could be used to achieve this, the proposed mechanism of action, and mode of delivery. This intervention will be subject to a feasibility study, with the intervention delivered online over a six-week period to participants who have had bariatric surgery within the previous five years.

Contribution of the Paper

  • This paper clearly explains the process involved in developing a theory and evidence-based physiotherapy-led complex behaviour change intervention.
  • The full specification of the intervention including proposed mechanism of effect has been provided, which should facilitate faithful intervention delivery and allow it to be comprehensively evaluated in a planned feasibility study.
  • This paper aims to enable physiotherapists to develop their own complex interventions, targeting behaviours that are relevant to their patients in their own areas of clinical practice.
目的:描述一种物理治疗师领导的群体行为改变干预的系统发展,针对接受减肥手术的个体的身体活动和久坐行为。研究设计:采用2008年MRC复杂干预框架,制定干预措施,包括证据综合、定性研究和干预成分制图。方法:我们进行了一项系统综述,以确定有希望的干预措施和成分的证据,以增加减肥手术后的身体活动和减少久坐行为。我们还对三个关键利益相关者群体(患者、临床医生和专员)进行了初步定性研究,探讨了这些行为。我们选择了两个当代行为改变框架,为干预措施的发展提供信息,并制定了一个概念矩阵,其中定义了干预目标,为选择适当的行为改变技术、拟议的行动机制和交付模式提供信息。我们还为参与者和辅导员编写了两本干预手册,以支持干预措施的交付和接收。结果:我们开发了一种针对减肥手术后患者身体活动和久坐行为的行为改变干预措施。定义了八个干预目标,并将其映射到行为改变轮和理论领域框架。我们确定了干预必须能够做什么(干预功能),可以用来实现这一目标的行为改变技术,建议的行动机制和交付模式。这项干预措施将受到可行性研究的影响,在过去五年内接受过减肥手术的参与者在网上进行为期六周的干预。论文贡献。
{"title":"Systematic development of a complex intervention: a theory and evidence-based physiotherapist led group intervention to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour following bariatric surgery (PARIS)","authors":"Jennifer James ,&nbsp;Wendy Hardeman ,&nbsp;Mark Goodall ,&nbsp;Helen Eborall ,&nbsp;John P.H. Wilding","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101451","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101451","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To describe the systematic development of a physiotherapist led group behaviour change intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour in individuals who have undergone bariatric surgery.</div></div><div><h3>Study design</h3><div>Intervention development including evidence synthesis, qualitative research and mapping of intervention components, using the 2008 MRC framework for complex interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review to identify the evidence for promising interventions and components to increase physical activity and reduce sedentary behaviour following bariatric surgery. We also conducted primary qualitative research exploring these behaviours with three key stakeholder groups: patients, clinicians and commissioners. We selected two contemporary behaviour change frameworks to inform intervention development and developed a conceptual matrix in which intervention objectives were defined to inform selection of appropriate behaviour change techniques, proposed mechanisms of action(s), and mode of delivery. We also developed two intervention handbooks for participants and facilitators to support delivery and receipt of the intervention.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We have developed a behaviour change intervention targeting physical activity and sedentary behaviour in patients following bariatric surgery. Eight intervention objectives were defined and mapped to the Behaviour Change Wheel and Theoretical Domains Framework. We identified what the intervention must be able to do (intervention functions), behaviour change techniques that could be used to achieve this, the proposed mechanism of action, and mode of delivery. This intervention will be subject to a feasibility study, with the intervention delivered online over a six-week period to participants who have had bariatric surgery within the previous five years.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>This paper clearly explains the process involved in developing a theory and evidence-based physiotherapy-led complex behaviour change intervention.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>The full specification of the intervention including proposed mechanism of effect has been provided, which should facilitate faithful intervention delivery and allow it to be comprehensively evaluated in a planned feasibility study.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>This paper aims to enable physiotherapists to develop their own complex interventions, targeting behaviours that are relevant to their patients in their own areas of clinical practice.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101451"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142824104","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review 在物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别仍然存在问题:一项系统综述。
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-10-31 DOI: 10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450
Emre Ilhan, Kathleen Solis, Cindy Liu, Jamal Khawaja, Tran Dang Khoa Chau, Kelly Gray

Background

Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.

Objectives

To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.

Data sources

Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.

Study selection or eligibility criteria

Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.

Synthesis methods

Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.

Results

Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.

Limitations

Only 5 journals were surveyed.

Conclusions and implications of key findings

The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.

PROSPERO Registration

CRD42022383976.

Contribution of the Paper

  • Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.
  • Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.
背景:在物理治疗干预试验中,性别和/或性别是如何报告的,我们知之甚少。目的:确定物理治疗干预的随机对照试验中报告性别和/或性别信息的性质和程度。数据来源:物理治疗,《物理治疗杂志》,《物理治疗》,《巴西物理治疗杂志》和《骨科与运动物理治疗杂志》。研究选择或资格标准:2018年至2024年间发表的物理治疗干预措施的随机对照试验由两名审稿人在标题/摘要和全文阶段独立筛选,然后从符合条件的全文中提取数据。提取关于是否以及如何收集、报告和定义性别和/或性别数据的信息。综合方法:使用频率和百分比对数据进行描述性分析。结果:在纳入的182项研究中,153项研究没有进行性别和/或性别排斥的招募。其中,136项研究(89%)在报告人口统计特征时使用了“性别”或“性别”这一术语。三项研究使用了“出生时性别分配”这一术语。在报告性和/或性别时,82/139(59%)的研究提供了两种性和/或性别描述符(例如,男性和女性;男性和女性),39/139(28%)的研究提供了一个描述符(例如,女性),尽管不是性别和/或性别排斥。四项研究提供了2个以上的描述符(例如,变性女性)。在所有的研究中,性别和/或社会性别的定义都不清楚。除三项研究外,所有研究都不清楚如何收集性别和/或性别,以及数据收集方法是否允许选择性别多样化选项(例如,非二元)。局限性:仅调查了5家期刊。主要发现的结论和含义:缺乏对性别和/或性特征的包容性报告,限制了物理治疗研究的范围和适用性,限制了人类经验的全部范围。普洛斯彼罗注册:CRD42022383976。论文贡献。
{"title":"Reporting of sex and/or gender in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions remains problematic: a systematic review","authors":"Emre Ilhan,&nbsp;Kathleen Solis,&nbsp;Cindy Liu,&nbsp;Jamal Khawaja,&nbsp;Tran Dang Khoa Chau,&nbsp;Kelly Gray","doi":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450","DOIUrl":"10.1016/j.physio.2024.101450","url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Little is known about how sex and/or gender is reported in trials on physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine the nature and extent of reporting sex and/or gender information in randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions.</div></div><div><h3>Data sources</h3><div>Physiotherapy, Journal of Physiotherapy, Physical Therapy, Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, and Journal of Orthopaedics and Sports Physical Therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Study selection or eligibility criteria</h3><div>Randomised controlled trials of physiotherapy interventions published between 2018 and 2024 were independently screened by two reviewers throughout title/abstract and full-text stages, then data were extracted from eligible full texts. Information on whether and how sex and/or gender data were collected, reported, and defined were extracted.</div></div><div><h3>Synthesis methods</h3><div>Data were analysed descriptively using frequencies and percentages.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 182 studies included in the review, 153 studies did not have sex and/or gender exclusive recruitment. Of these, 136 studies (89%) used the terms “sex” or “gender” when reporting demographic characteristics. Three studies used the term “sex assigned at birth”. When reporting sex and/or gender, 82/139 (59%) studies provided two descriptors for sex and/or gender (e.g., male and female; men and women), 39/139 (28%) studies provided one descriptor (e.g., female) despite not being sex and/or gender exclusive. Four studies provided more than 2 descriptors (e.g., transgender women). In all studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was defined. In all but three studies, it was unclear how sex and/or gender was collected and whether data collection methods allowed for gender diverse options (e.g., non-binary) to be selected.</div></div><div><h3>Limitations</h3><div>Only 5 journals were surveyed.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and implications of key findings</h3><div>The lack of inclusive reporting of gender and/or sex characteristics limits the scope and applicability of research in physiotherapy to the full spectrum of human experiences.</div></div><div><h3>PROSPERO Registration</h3><div>CRD42022383976.</div></div><div><h3>Contribution of the Paper</h3><div><ul><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should refer to up-to-date reporting guidelines when designing, collecting, and reporting sex and/or gender-based analyses.</div></span></li><li><span>•</span><span><div>Researchers should engage in sex and gender inclusive research practices when conducting and reporting physiotherapy research.</div></span></li></ul></div></div>","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"126 ","pages":"Article 101450"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142848430","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Editors 编辑
IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Pub Date : 2024-10-30 DOI: 10.1016/S0031-9406(24)00442-5
{"title":"Editors","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/S0031-9406(24)00442-5","DOIUrl":"10.1016/S0031-9406(24)00442-5","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":54608,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy","volume":"125 ","pages":"Article 101433"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142552387","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Physiotherapy
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1