Depression and anxiety among pregnant women during COVID 19 pandemic in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.3 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Frontiers in global women's health Pub Date : 2024-12-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fgwh.2024.1453157
Temesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh, Mohhamed Wogris
{"title":"Depression and anxiety among pregnant women during COVID 19 pandemic in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Temesgen Gebeyehu Wondmeneh, Mohhamed Wogris","doi":"10.3389/fgwh.2024.1453157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on the mental health of the public worldwide, but the problem is worst among pregnant women due to social distancing policies and mandatory lockdown, including prenatal care services. As a result, the prevalence of depression and anxiety could increase during the pandemic, particularly among pregnant women. Thus, the purpose of this review is to determine the magnitude of depression and anxiety and contributing factors among pregnant women during the pandemic in Ethiopia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Web of Science, Since Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online were the electronic databases searched, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed in this review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A predefined data extraction sheet developed in Excel was used to extract the data. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was determined by a random effect model meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>4,269 and 1,672 pregnant women were involved in depression and anxiety studies, respectively. The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was 24.7% (95% CI: 18.52-30.87) and 35.19% (95% CI: 26.83-43.55), respectively. Single marital status (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-3.37), poor social support (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.06-4.35), unplanned pregnancies (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34-3.0), and unsatisfied marital status (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.14) were risk factors for depression. Violence against intimate partners (AOR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-3.77) and poor social support (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.24-2.71) were risk factors for anxiety.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>One-fourth and nearly one-third of pregnant women had depression and anxiety, respectively, during COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia. Single or unsatisfied marital status and unplanned pregnancies were risk factors for depression. Poor social support was significantly associated with depression and anxiety. Pregnant women who experienced violence against intimate partners had higher anxiety. After COVID-19 pandemic, mental health interventions are essential for reducing depression and anxiety.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=527148, PROSPERO (CRD42024527148).</p>","PeriodicalId":73087,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in global women's health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1453157"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11649664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in global women's health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fgwh.2024.1453157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Coronavirus Disease-19 pandemic had an adverse impact on the mental health of the public worldwide, but the problem is worst among pregnant women due to social distancing policies and mandatory lockdown, including prenatal care services. As a result, the prevalence of depression and anxiety could increase during the pandemic, particularly among pregnant women. Thus, the purpose of this review is to determine the magnitude of depression and anxiety and contributing factors among pregnant women during the pandemic in Ethiopia.

Methods: Web of Science, Since Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, and African Journals Online were the electronic databases searched, the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed in this review. The Newcastle-Ottawa Critical Appraisal Checklist was used to assess the quality of the included studies. A predefined data extraction sheet developed in Excel was used to extract the data. The pooled prevalence of anxiety and depression was determined by a random effect model meta-analysis.

Results: 4,269 and 1,672 pregnant women were involved in depression and anxiety studies, respectively. The pooled prevalence of depression and anxiety among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia was 24.7% (95% CI: 18.52-30.87) and 35.19% (95% CI: 26.83-43.55), respectively. Single marital status (AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-3.37), poor social support (AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.06-4.35), unplanned pregnancies (AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34-3.0), and unsatisfied marital status (AOR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.14) were risk factors for depression. Violence against intimate partners (AOR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-3.77) and poor social support (AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.24-2.71) were risk factors for anxiety.

Conclusion: One-fourth and nearly one-third of pregnant women had depression and anxiety, respectively, during COVID-19 pandemic in Ethiopia. Single or unsatisfied marital status and unplanned pregnancies were risk factors for depression. Poor social support was significantly associated with depression and anxiety. Pregnant women who experienced violence against intimate partners had higher anxiety. After COVID-19 pandemic, mental health interventions are essential for reducing depression and anxiety.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=527148, PROSPERO (CRD42024527148).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
埃塞俄比亚COVID - 19大流行期间孕妇的抑郁和焦虑:一项系统综述和荟萃分析
背景:冠状病毒病-19大流行对全球公众的心理健康产生了不利影响,但由于社会距离政策和包括产前护理服务在内的强制性封锁,孕妇的问题最为严重。因此,在大流行期间,抑郁和焦虑的患病率可能会增加,特别是在孕妇中。因此,本次审查的目的是确定埃塞俄比亚大流行期间孕妇的抑郁和焦虑程度及其影响因素。方法:Web of Science,由于Direct、PubMed、谷歌Scholar和African Journals Online是电子数据库,因此本综述遵循了系统评价和元分析(PRISMA)报告指南的首选报告项目。纽卡斯尔-渥太华关键评估清单用于评估纳入研究的质量。使用Excel开发的预定义数据提取表提取数据。焦虑和抑郁的总患病率由随机效应模型荟萃分析确定。结果:分别有4269名和1672名孕妇参与了抑郁和焦虑的研究。埃塞俄比亚2019冠状病毒病大流行期间孕妇抑郁和焦虑的总患病率分别为24.7% (95% CI: 18.52-30.87)和35.19% (95% CI: 26.83-43.55)。单身婚姻状况(AOR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.07-3.37)、社会支持差(AOR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.06-4.35)、意外怀孕(AOR = 2.17, 95% CI: 1.34-3.0)、婚姻状况不满意(AOR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.17-3.14)是抑郁症的危险因素。对亲密伴侣的暴力(AOR = 2.87, 95% CI: 1.97-3.77)和社会支持差(AOR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.24-2.71)是焦虑的危险因素。结论:在埃塞俄比亚,COVID-19大流行期间,分别有四分之一和近三分之一的孕妇患有抑郁症和焦虑症。单身或不满意的婚姻状况和意外怀孕是抑郁症的危险因素。缺乏社会支持与抑郁和焦虑显著相关。遭受过亲密伴侣暴力的孕妇焦虑程度更高。在2019冠状病毒病大流行之后,精神卫生干预措施对于减少抑郁和焦虑至关重要。系统评价注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=527148, PROSPERO (CRD42024527148)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cervical cancer screening utilization among healthcare professionals in Ethiopia: systematic review and meta-analysis. Male partner involvement in postnatal care service utilization and its associated factors in Wolaita Sodo, southern Ethiopia, 2023. Exploration of the relationship between primary dysmenorrhea, pain perception, and menstruation-related quality of life in young women: a cross-sectional observational study. Predicting pregnancy loss and its determinants among reproductive-aged women using supervised machine learning algorithms in Sub-Saharan Africa. Editorial: Quality of sexual and reproductive health care: strengths, gaps, and challenges for midwifery care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1