Fluctuation of physical function during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy during rehabilitation intervention: Real-world data and risk factor analyses

EJHaem Pub Date : 2024-11-04 DOI:10.1002/jha2.1043
Ryota Hamada, Yasuyuki Arai, Toshio Kitawaki, Naokazu Nakamura, Masanobu Murao, Michiko Matsushita, Junsuke Miyasaka, Tsugumi Asano, Tomoyasu Jo, Momoko Nishikori, Junya Kanda, Chisaki Mizumoto, Kouhei Yamashita, Ryosuke Ikeguchi, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo
{"title":"Fluctuation of physical function during chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy during rehabilitation intervention: Real-world data and risk factor analyses","authors":"Ryota Hamada,&nbsp;Yasuyuki Arai,&nbsp;Toshio Kitawaki,&nbsp;Naokazu Nakamura,&nbsp;Masanobu Murao,&nbsp;Michiko Matsushita,&nbsp;Junsuke Miyasaka,&nbsp;Tsugumi Asano,&nbsp;Tomoyasu Jo,&nbsp;Momoko Nishikori,&nbsp;Junya Kanda,&nbsp;Chisaki Mizumoto,&nbsp;Kouhei Yamashita,&nbsp;Ryosuke Ikeguchi,&nbsp;Akifumi Takaori-Kondo","doi":"10.1002/jha2.1043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy face prolonged treatment timelines and are prone to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after infusion. Disabilities in physical function and the importance of rehabilitation during CAR-T-cell therapy to maintain physical function have been poorly documented.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess changes in exercise tolerance via differences in a 6-min-walking distance (Δ6MWD) and factors influencing it.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 77 patients who underwent rehabilitation during CAR-T-cell therapy were enrolled, and their 6MWD was 450 m (median, range 180–705 m) before and 450.5 m (107.0–735.0 m) 30 days after CAR-T treatment. No significant alteration in Δ6MWD was observed overall (11.0 m, 95% confidence interval, −56.1 to 88.2 m). Multiple regression analyses indicated that age (over vs. under 65 years) revealed no notable differences in Δ6MWD (20 vs. 10 m), while ΔHb (<i>β</i> = 0.24, <i>p</i> = 0.03), moderate/severe CRS (grade 1 with continuous fever or grade ≥2; <i>β</i> = −0.25, <i>p</i> = 0.03), and ICANS (any grade; <i>β</i> = −0.22, <i>p</i> = 0.04) were significantly associated with lower Δ6MWD.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This real-world study indicated that CAR-T-cell therapy is less likely to reduce physical function even in older patients if rehabilitation is properly performed, whereas CRS and ICANS can be risk factors to deprive exercise tolerance.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":72883,"journal":{"name":"EJHaem","volume":"5 6","pages":"1252-1259"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11647737/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJHaem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jha2.1043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Patients undergoing chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy face prolonged treatment timelines and are prone to cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) after infusion. Disabilities in physical function and the importance of rehabilitation during CAR-T-cell therapy to maintain physical function have been poorly documented.

Method

We performed a retrospective cohort study to assess changes in exercise tolerance via differences in a 6-min-walking distance (Δ6MWD) and factors influencing it.

Results

A total of 77 patients who underwent rehabilitation during CAR-T-cell therapy were enrolled, and their 6MWD was 450 m (median, range 180–705 m) before and 450.5 m (107.0–735.0 m) 30 days after CAR-T treatment. No significant alteration in Δ6MWD was observed overall (11.0 m, 95% confidence interval, −56.1 to 88.2 m). Multiple regression analyses indicated that age (over vs. under 65 years) revealed no notable differences in Δ6MWD (20 vs. 10 m), while ΔHb (β = 0.24, p = 0.03), moderate/severe CRS (grade 1 with continuous fever or grade ≥2; β = −0.25, p = 0.03), and ICANS (any grade; β = −0.22, p = 0.04) were significantly associated with lower Δ6MWD.

Conclusion

This real-world study indicated that CAR-T-cell therapy is less likely to reduce physical function even in older patients if rehabilitation is properly performed, whereas CRS and ICANS can be risk factors to deprive exercise tolerance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康复干预期间嵌合抗原受体t细胞治疗期间身体功能的波动:真实世界数据和危险因素分析。
导语:接受CAR - t细胞治疗的患者面临治疗时间延长,输注后容易发生细胞因子释放综合征(CRS)和免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征(ICANS)。身体功能障碍和car - t细胞治疗期间康复对维持身体功能的重要性文献很少。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,通过6分钟步行距离(Δ6MWD)的差异评估运动耐量的变化及其影响因素。结果:共纳入77例CAR-T细胞治疗期间康复的患者,其6MWD在CAR-T治疗前为450 m(中位数,180-705 m),在CAR-T治疗后30天为450.5 m (107.0-735.0 m)。总体上Δ6MWD无显著变化(11.0 m, 95%可信区间,-56.1 ~ 88.2 m)。多元回归分析显示年龄(65岁以上vs. 65岁以下)Δ6MWD无显著差异(20 vs. 10 m),而ΔHb (β = 0.24, p = 0.03),中/重度CRS(1级持续发烧或≥2级;β = -0.25, p = 0.03), ICANS(任何分级;β = -0.22, p = 0.04)与较低的Δ6MWD显著相关。结论:这项现实世界的研究表明,如果康复治疗得当,即使在老年患者中,car - t细胞治疗也不太可能降低身体功能,而CRS和ICANS可能是剥夺运动耐量的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Central nervous system relapse of primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma: A case report Extramedullary Relapse of Acute Promyelocytic Leukaemia (APL) at an Unusual Site (External Auditory Canal) Overall and Cause-Specific Mortality Among Patients With Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma in the United States Haploidentical Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation as a Superior Alternative for Patients With Mismatch Donors—A Single Center Experience in 152 Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1