[RIGHT HEART FAILURE PRESENTATION OF IDIOPATHIC MASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM - CASE REPORT].

Harefuah Pub Date : 2024-12-01
Doron Menachemi, Margarita Fraimovitch, Roberto Ainbinder, Miriam Judith Ginzburg
{"title":"[RIGHT HEART FAILURE PRESENTATION OF IDIOPATHIC MASSIVE PULMONARY EMBOLISM - CASE REPORT].","authors":"Doron Menachemi, Margarita Fraimovitch, Roberto Ainbinder, Miriam Judith Ginzburg","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life threatening condition with age-related escalation in prevalence. Acute PE is a common and sometimes fatal disease. The approach to the evaluation should be efficient while simultaneously avoiding the risks of unnecessary testing so that therapy can be promptly initiated and potential morbidity and mortality avoided. The imminent condition might lead to obstructive shock with acute right heart failure and eventually to rapid hemodynamic deterioration and death. At a younger age, massive PE causes death very rapidly in one third of the cases. During one year, follow-up of death in the presence of right heart failure is three times higher than those without it. About half of PE cases, are idiopathic and occur without acquired risk factors such as antecedent trauma, surgery, immobilization, or diagnosis of cancer. Unlike provoked PE (pPE) with acquired risk factors, idiopathic PE (iPE) is less likely to be predicted or prevented. Failure to accurately and promptly diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE can result in excess morbidity and mortality due to post thrombotic syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, and recurrent thrombosis. Chest pain and shortness of breath are chief complaints frequently evaluated in the emergency department. Younger patients tend to have benign presentations, and often leave with diagnoses of self-limiting diseases or etiologies that are easily treated in the emergency department. The presenting clinical signs and symptoms should illuminate the primary physician to this life-threatening condition leading to fast diagnosis and prompt lifesaving treatment. At the end of the primary treatment, we need to assess and address each patient for the likelihood of thromboembolism recurrence, which will be highest among those patients with idiopathic events or those with cancer-associated thrombosis. We favor prolonged anticoagulation in these scenarios. In addition, we strongly advocate periodic scheduled follow-up of patients on long-term anticoagulation for secondary prophylaxis to re-evaluate their bleeding and recurrence risk. In practice, initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism should be based on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients without renal failure. Thrombolytic agents may be useful in case of massive pulmonary embolism, but more evaluation is needed. Bleeding and heparin thrombocytopenia are the main adverse effects of these treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":101459,"journal":{"name":"Harefuah","volume":"163 11","pages":"695-698"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harefuah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Massive pulmonary embolism (PE) is a life threatening condition with age-related escalation in prevalence. Acute PE is a common and sometimes fatal disease. The approach to the evaluation should be efficient while simultaneously avoiding the risks of unnecessary testing so that therapy can be promptly initiated and potential morbidity and mortality avoided. The imminent condition might lead to obstructive shock with acute right heart failure and eventually to rapid hemodynamic deterioration and death. At a younger age, massive PE causes death very rapidly in one third of the cases. During one year, follow-up of death in the presence of right heart failure is three times higher than those without it. About half of PE cases, are idiopathic and occur without acquired risk factors such as antecedent trauma, surgery, immobilization, or diagnosis of cancer. Unlike provoked PE (pPE) with acquired risk factors, idiopathic PE (iPE) is less likely to be predicted or prevented. Failure to accurately and promptly diagnose and treat deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and PE can result in excess morbidity and mortality due to post thrombotic syndrome, pulmonary hypertension, and recurrent thrombosis. Chest pain and shortness of breath are chief complaints frequently evaluated in the emergency department. Younger patients tend to have benign presentations, and often leave with diagnoses of self-limiting diseases or etiologies that are easily treated in the emergency department. The presenting clinical signs and symptoms should illuminate the primary physician to this life-threatening condition leading to fast diagnosis and prompt lifesaving treatment. At the end of the primary treatment, we need to assess and address each patient for the likelihood of thromboembolism recurrence, which will be highest among those patients with idiopathic events or those with cancer-associated thrombosis. We favor prolonged anticoagulation in these scenarios. In addition, we strongly advocate periodic scheduled follow-up of patients on long-term anticoagulation for secondary prophylaxis to re-evaluate their bleeding and recurrence risk. In practice, initial treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism should be based on low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) in patients without renal failure. Thrombolytic agents may be useful in case of massive pulmonary embolism, but more evaluation is needed. Bleeding and heparin thrombocytopenia are the main adverse effects of these treatments.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[特发性大面积肺栓塞的右心衰竭表现--病例报告]。
大规模肺栓塞(PE)是一种危及生命的疾病,其患病率与年龄相关。急性肺心病是一种常见且有时致命的疾病。评估的方法应该是有效的,同时避免不必要的检测风险,以便及时开始治疗,避免潜在的发病率和死亡率。这种迫在眉睫的状况可能导致阻塞性休克并急性右心衰,最终导致血液动力学迅速恶化和死亡。在年轻的时候,三分之一的病例中,大量PE会导致死亡。在一年的随访中,右心衰患者的死亡率是无右心衰患者的三倍。大约一半的PE病例是特发性的,没有获得性危险因素,如先前的创伤、手术、固定或癌症诊断。与具有获得性风险因素的诱发性PE (pPE)不同,特发性PE (iPE)不太可能被预测或预防。如果不能准确、及时地诊断和治疗深静脉血栓形成(DVT)和PE,可能会导致血栓形成后综合征、肺动脉高压和复发性血栓形成所导致的过高的发病率和死亡率。胸痛和呼吸短促是急诊科经常评估的主诉。年轻的患者往往有良性的表现,往往离开诊断自限性疾病或病因,很容易在急诊室治疗。呈现的临床体征和症状应该使主治医生了解这种危及生命的疾病,从而快速诊断和及时治疗。在初级治疗结束时,我们需要评估和处理每个患者的血栓栓塞复发的可能性,这在特发性事件或癌症相关血栓形成的患者中是最高的。在这种情况下,我们倾向于延长抗凝时间。此外,我们强烈建议定期随访长期抗凝二级预防患者,以重新评估其出血和复发风险。在实践中,对于没有肾功能衰竭的患者,深静脉血栓和肺栓塞的初始治疗应以低分子肝素(LMWH)为基础。溶栓剂在大面积肺栓塞的情况下可能有用,但需要更多的评估。出血和肝素性血小板减少症是这些治疗的主要副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[LISTENING FOR SAFETY]. [POST-ORGASMIC ILLNESS SYNDROME]. [RAPID GENOMIC HUMAN IDENTIFICATION BY "LAB-ON-A-CHIP" TECHNOLOGIES DURING "IRON SWORDS" WAR]. [SEX AND GENDER DIFFERENCES IN EXPOSURE TO CHILDHOOD VIOLENCE AND ITS EFFECT IN ADULTHOOD ON CHRONIC PHYSICAL MORBIDITY]. [TRAUMA-INFORMED CARE IN THE PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEM: CLINICAL IMPORTANCE, PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS AND GUIDING PRINCIPLES].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1