Mortality after high‐risk myocardial infarction over the last 20 years: Insights from the VALIANT and PARADISE‐MI trials

IF 16.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Journal of Heart Failure Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1002/ejhf.3557
Alberto Foà, Maria A. Pabon, Eugene Braunwald, Karola Jering, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L. Claggett, Lars Køber, Eldrin F. Lewis, Christopher B. Granger, Peter van der Meer, Jean L. Rouleau, Aldo P. Maggioni, John J.V. McMurray, Scott D. Solomon, Marc A. Pfeffer
{"title":"Mortality after high‐risk myocardial infarction over the last 20 years: Insights from the VALIANT and PARADISE‐MI trials","authors":"Alberto Foà, Maria A. Pabon, Eugene Braunwald, Karola Jering, Muthiah Vaduganathan, Brian L. Claggett, Lars Køber, Eldrin F. Lewis, Christopher B. Granger, Peter van der Meer, Jean L. Rouleau, Aldo P. Maggioni, John J.V. McMurray, Scott D. Solomon, Marc A. Pfeffer","doi":"10.1002/ejhf.3557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimsThe temporal changes in clinical profiles and outcomes of high‐risk myocardial infarction survivors enrolled in clinical trials are poorly described. This study compares mortality rates, baseline characteristics, and the prognostic impact of therapies among participants of the VALIANT and PARADISE‐MI trials.Methods and resultsExclusively VALIANT participants who matched the inclusion criteria of the PARADISE‐MI trial were included in the analysis. Risk of death was compared between trials using Cox regression models. The impact of baseline characteristics and therapies on mortality was estimated by the magnitude reduction of β coefficients using Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 9617 VALIANT participants matched the inclusion criteria of the PARADISE‐MI trial (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 5661). All‐cause mortality in PARADISE‐MI was less than half that in VALIANT (4.2 vs 9.9 per 100 patient‐years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.46). This difference was reduced after adjustment for clinical variables but remained substantial (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80). The most important mediator of this reduction related to covariate adjustment was the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), accounting for almost half of the attenuation observed. Similar results were found for cardiovascular (CV) death, while no between‐trial significant differences were found in the non‐CV mortality risk.ConclusionsCardiovascular mortality following high‐risk myocardial infarction has significantly declined over time, while the risk for non‐CV death has remained unchanged. This improvement is partially attributable to advancements in CV care, particularly the use of PCI. Continued efforts to implement guidelines and standardize the quality of care are needed to sustain this positive trend.","PeriodicalId":164,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Heart Failure","volume":"83 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":16.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3557","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AimsThe temporal changes in clinical profiles and outcomes of high‐risk myocardial infarction survivors enrolled in clinical trials are poorly described. This study compares mortality rates, baseline characteristics, and the prognostic impact of therapies among participants of the VALIANT and PARADISE‐MI trials.Methods and resultsExclusively VALIANT participants who matched the inclusion criteria of the PARADISE‐MI trial were included in the analysis. Risk of death was compared between trials using Cox regression models. The impact of baseline characteristics and therapies on mortality was estimated by the magnitude reduction of β coefficients using Cox proportional hazards regression models. A total of 9617 VALIANT participants matched the inclusion criteria of the PARADISE‐MI trial (n = 5661). All‐cause mortality in PARADISE‐MI was less than half that in VALIANT (4.2 vs 9.9 per 100 patient‐years; hazard ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37–0.46). This difference was reduced after adjustment for clinical variables but remained substantial (adjusted HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58–0.80). The most important mediator of this reduction related to covariate adjustment was the use of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), accounting for almost half of the attenuation observed. Similar results were found for cardiovascular (CV) death, while no between‐trial significant differences were found in the non‐CV mortality risk.ConclusionsCardiovascular mortality following high‐risk myocardial infarction has significantly declined over time, while the risk for non‐CV death has remained unchanged. This improvement is partially attributable to advancements in CV care, particularly the use of PCI. Continued efforts to implement guidelines and standardize the quality of care are needed to sustain this positive trend.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过去20年高风险心肌梗死后的死亡率:来自VALIANT和PARADISE试验的见解
目的:临床试验中高危心肌梗死幸存者的临床概况和预后的时间变化描述甚少。本研究比较了VALIANT和PARADISE - MI试验参与者的死亡率、基线特征和治疗对预后的影响。方法和结果符合PARADISE - MI试验纳入标准的VALIANT受试者被纳入分析。使用Cox回归模型比较试验之间的死亡风险。采用Cox比例风险回归模型,通过β系数的减小幅度来估计基线特征和治疗对死亡率的影响。共有9617名VALIANT参与者符合PARADISE - MI试验的纳入标准(n = 5661)。PARADISE - MI的全因死亡率不到VALIANT的一半(4.2 vs 9.9 / 100患者年;风险比[HR] 0.41, 95%可信区间[CI] 0.37-0.46)。调整临床变量后,这种差异减小,但仍然很大(调整后HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.80)。与协变量调整相关的这种降低最重要的中介是经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的使用,几乎占观察到的衰减的一半。在心血管(CV)死亡风险方面也发现了类似的结果,而在非CV死亡风险方面没有发现试验间的显著差异。结论:随着时间的推移,高危心肌梗死后的心血管死亡率显著下降,而非心血管疾病死亡的风险保持不变。这种改善部分归因于心血管护理的进步,特别是PCI的使用。为了维持这一积极趋势,需要继续努力执行指导方针并使护理质量标准化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Heart Failure
European Journal of Heart Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
11.50%
发文量
365
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Heart Failure is an international journal dedicated to advancing knowledge in the field of heart failure management. The journal publishes reviews and editorials aimed at improving understanding, prevention, investigation, and treatment of heart failure. It covers various disciplines such as molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, clinical sciences, social sciences, and population sciences. The journal welcomes submissions of manuscripts on basic, clinical, and population sciences, as well as original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics, and other related specialist fields. It is published monthly and has a readership that includes cardiologists, emergency room physicians, intensivists, internists, general physicians, cardiac nurses, diabetologists, epidemiologists, basic scientists focusing on cardiovascular research, and those working in rehabilitation. The journal is abstracted and indexed in various databases such as Academic Search, Embase, MEDLINE/PubMed, and Science Citation Index.
期刊最新文献
Hierarchical composite outcomes are here to stay, despite the limitations of the win ratio Canagliflozin reduces oral loop diuretic intensification in patients with type 2 diabetes: A participant-level pooled analysis of the CANVAS and CREDENCE trials Utility of loop diuretics as a marker of risk in clinical trials of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Analysis from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry Circulating growth differentiation factor-15 levels are associated with early echocardiographic signs of diastolic function impairment in the STANISLAS cohort: A 20-year follow-up study Beta-blockers and heart failure with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction. A personalized approach beyond the heart failure syndrome phenotypes is needed
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1