Comparative effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of perinatal depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 3.8 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Asian journal of psychiatry Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104316
Robert David Smith, Wen Dang, Shuyuan Shen, Sze Chai Hung, Ip Hoi Lam, Jojo Y Y Kwok, Edmond P H Choi, Daniel Y T Fong, Shehzad Ali, Claire A Wilson, Kris Y W Lok
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of interventions for the prevention and treatment of perinatal depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Robert David Smith, Wen Dang, Shuyuan Shen, Sze Chai Hung, Ip Hoi Lam, Jojo Y Y Kwok, Edmond P H Choi, Daniel Y T Fong, Shehzad Ali, Claire A Wilson, Kris Y W Lok","doi":"10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several interventions have been investigated addressing perinatal depression; however, interventions have not been compared using both direct and indirect evidence. This study compared the relative effectiveness of all interventions that prevent depression (objective 1) or treat depression symptoms (objective 2) in perinatal women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eight databases searched from their inception to March 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials in perinatal women participants evaluating any interventions that addressed prevention or treatment of depression. Two random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted using studies with perinatal women participants reporting frequency of depression or reporting depression severity. For objective 1 odds ratios (OR) and objective 2 standardised mean differences (SMD) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 177 articles were included (n = 76 objective 1, n = 101 objective 2). For objective 1; mindfulness was the highest-ranking intervention (SCURA=88), with significant OR compared to treatment as usual (TAU) (OR=0.21; 0.06, 0.71 95 %CrI). Other interventions with significant OR, compared to TAU included: pharmacological treatments, CBT, physical activities, education, and collaborative care. For objective 2; interpersonal therapy plus massage was the highest-ranking intervention (SCURA=89) with significant SMD compared to TAU (SMD=-1.38; -2.54, -0.21). Other interventions with significant SMD compared to TAU: IPT, alternative therapies, physical activities, mindfulness, CBT, collaborative care, education, and enhanced TAU. Pharmacological treatments were effective compared to sham/placebo.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBT, mindfulness, physical activity, collaborative care, education, and pharmacological interventions were effective in addressing prevention and treatment of perinatal depression symptoms compared to control arms. Healthcare providers may consider offering these interventions to perinatal women.</p>","PeriodicalId":8543,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of psychiatry","volume":"103 ","pages":"104316"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2024.104316","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several interventions have been investigated addressing perinatal depression; however, interventions have not been compared using both direct and indirect evidence. This study compared the relative effectiveness of all interventions that prevent depression (objective 1) or treat depression symptoms (objective 2) in perinatal women.

Methods: Eight databases searched from their inception to March 2024. Inclusion criteria were randomised controlled trials in perinatal women participants evaluating any interventions that addressed prevention or treatment of depression. Two random-effects Bayesian network meta-analyses were conducted using studies with perinatal women participants reporting frequency of depression or reporting depression severity. For objective 1 odds ratios (OR) and objective 2 standardised mean differences (SMD) were used.

Results: A total of 177 articles were included (n = 76 objective 1, n = 101 objective 2). For objective 1; mindfulness was the highest-ranking intervention (SCURA=88), with significant OR compared to treatment as usual (TAU) (OR=0.21; 0.06, 0.71 95 %CrI). Other interventions with significant OR, compared to TAU included: pharmacological treatments, CBT, physical activities, education, and collaborative care. For objective 2; interpersonal therapy plus massage was the highest-ranking intervention (SCURA=89) with significant SMD compared to TAU (SMD=-1.38; -2.54, -0.21). Other interventions with significant SMD compared to TAU: IPT, alternative therapies, physical activities, mindfulness, CBT, collaborative care, education, and enhanced TAU. Pharmacological treatments were effective compared to sham/placebo.

Conclusion: CBT, mindfulness, physical activity, collaborative care, education, and pharmacological interventions were effective in addressing prevention and treatment of perinatal depression symptoms compared to control arms. Healthcare providers may consider offering these interventions to perinatal women.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
围产期抑郁症预防和治疗干预措施的比较效果:系统综述和网络荟萃分析。
背景:一些干预措施已经研究解决围产期抑郁症;然而,还没有使用直接和间接证据对干预措施进行比较。本研究比较了围产期妇女预防抑郁(目标1)或治疗抑郁症状(目标2)的所有干预措施的相对有效性。方法:检索自建库至2024年3月的8个数据库。纳入标准是围产期妇女参与者的随机对照试验,评估任何预防或治疗抑郁症的干预措施。两项随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析使用围产期妇女参与者报告抑郁频率或报告抑郁严重程度的研究进行。目标1采用优势比(OR),目标2采用标准化平均差异(SMD)。结果:共纳入177篇文献(n = 目标1 76篇,n = 目标2 101篇)。正念是排名最高的干预措施(SCURA=88),与常规治疗(TAU)相比具有显著的OR (OR=0.21;0.06, 0.71 95 %CrI)。与TAU相比,其他具有显著OR的干预措施包括:药物治疗、CBT、体育活动、教育和协作护理。对于目标2;人际治疗加按摩是最高级别的干预(SCURA=89),与TAU (SMD=-1.38;-2.54, -0.21)。与TAU相比,其他具有显著SMD的干预措施包括:IPT、替代疗法、体育活动、正念、CBT、协作护理、教育和增强TAU。与假药/安慰剂相比,药物治疗有效。结论:与对照组相比,CBT、正念、体育活动、协同护理、教育和药物干预在预防和治疗围产期抑郁症状方面是有效的。医疗保健提供者可考虑向围产期妇女提供这些干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asian journal of psychiatry
Asian journal of psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
297
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The Asian Journal of Psychiatry serves as a comprehensive resource for psychiatrists, mental health clinicians, neurologists, physicians, mental health students, and policymakers. Its goal is to facilitate the exchange of research findings and clinical practices between Asia and the global community. The journal focuses on psychiatric research relevant to Asia, covering preclinical, clinical, service system, and policy development topics. It also highlights the socio-cultural diversity of the region in relation to mental health.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the cognitive vulnerabilities in traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study conducted in an urban south India cohort. Methylphenidate augmentation for electroconvulsive therapy-resistant major depressive disorder. Considering early adversities in the personalized treatment of addiction. Dyce Sombre's 'Lunacy'. Development of a suicide early warning system for Hong Kong using statistical process control and nowcasting based on media reported suicide deaths.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1