Women's perspectives of molecular breast imaging: a qualitative study.

IF 6.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY British Journal of Cancer Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1
Helen Elliott, A Joy Allen, Nerys D Forester, Sara Graziadio, W S Jones, Beverley Clare Lendrem, Mark S Pearce, Timothy Powell, Jason Scott, Alison Bray
{"title":"Women's perspectives of molecular breast imaging: a qualitative study.","authors":"Helen Elliott, A Joy Allen, Nerys D Forester, Sara Graziadio, W S Jones, Beverley Clare Lendrem, Mark S Pearce, Timothy Powell, Jason Scott, Alison Bray","doi":"10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mammography has poor sensitivity in dense breast tissue. Retrospective studies suggest that Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI), has superior diagnostic accuracy to mammography in women with very dense breast tissue. Women's perspectives of MBI are unknown, but are crucial to understanding the feasibility of, and routes to, adoption into practice.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Semi-structured interviews with screened and unscreened women explored acceptability of MBI. Data were analysed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were generated from nineteen interviews: (1) presumed negative aspects of MBI are acceptable (2) convenience of access, (3) comfort in familiarity and (4) need for shared decisions relating to risk. Presumed negative aspects of MBI, such as radiation dose and forty-minute scan time, were acceptable provided there are benefits. Some participants were concerned about equitable access, such as parking. Participants expressed comfort in existing and familiar screening processes. Participants acknowledged that informing women of their breast density may result in increased anxiety, but it was still felt to be important to ensure women are fully informed of the risks and harms of screening.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Women consider MBI to be an acceptable breast imaging modality. High-quality information enabling informed decision-making is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-024-02930-1","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mammography has poor sensitivity in dense breast tissue. Retrospective studies suggest that Molecular Breast Imaging (MBI), has superior diagnostic accuracy to mammography in women with very dense breast tissue. Women's perspectives of MBI are unknown, but are crucial to understanding the feasibility of, and routes to, adoption into practice.

Method: Semi-structured interviews with screened and unscreened women explored acceptability of MBI. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Four themes were generated from nineteen interviews: (1) presumed negative aspects of MBI are acceptable (2) convenience of access, (3) comfort in familiarity and (4) need for shared decisions relating to risk. Presumed negative aspects of MBI, such as radiation dose and forty-minute scan time, were acceptable provided there are benefits. Some participants were concerned about equitable access, such as parking. Participants expressed comfort in existing and familiar screening processes. Participants acknowledged that informing women of their breast density may result in increased anxiety, but it was still felt to be important to ensure women are fully informed of the risks and harms of screening.

Conclusions: Women consider MBI to be an acceptable breast imaging modality. High-quality information enabling informed decision-making is essential.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British Journal of Cancer
British Journal of Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
383
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.
期刊最新文献
The accuracy of fluorine 18-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT and MRI for diagnosis of prostate cancer in PSA grey zone. Women's perspectives of molecular breast imaging: a qualitative study. Commentary to: Cancer and treatment specific incidence rates of immune related adverse events induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review. Dietary intake of isoflavones and coumestrol and risk of pancreatic cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial. Identification of diagnostic biomarkers in prostate cancer-related fatigue by construction of predictive models and experimental validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1