An explainable analysis of diabetes mellitus using statistical and artificial intelligence techniques.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02810-x
William Hoyos, Kenia Hoyos, Rander Ruiz, Jose Aguilar
{"title":"An explainable analysis of diabetes mellitus using statistical and artificial intelligence techniques.","authors":"William Hoyos, Kenia Hoyos, Rander Ruiz, Jose Aguilar","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02810-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease prevalent worldwide, requiring a multifaceted analytical approach to improve early detection and subsequent mitigation of morbidity and mortality rates. This research aimed to develop an explainable analysis of DM by combining sociodemographic and clinical data with statistical and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Leveraging a small dataset that includes sociodemographic and clinical profiles of diabetic and non-diabetic individuals, we employed a diverse set of statistical and AI models for predictive purposes and assessment of DM risk factors. The statistical tests used were Student's t-test and Chi-square, while the AI techniques were fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and XGBoost.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our statistical models facilitated an in-depth exploration of variable associations, while the resulting AI models demonstrated exceptional efficacy in DM classification. In particular, the XGBoost model showed superior performance in accuracy, sensitivity and specificity with values of 1 for each of these metrics. On the other hand, the FCM stood out for its explainability capabilities by allowing an analysis of the variables involved in the prediction using scenario-based simulations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>An integrated analysis of DM using a variety of methodologies is critical for timely detection of the disease and informed clinical decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":"24 1","pages":"383"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654128/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02810-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a chronic disease prevalent worldwide, requiring a multifaceted analytical approach to improve early detection and subsequent mitigation of morbidity and mortality rates. This research aimed to develop an explainable analysis of DM by combining sociodemographic and clinical data with statistical and artificial intelligence (AI) techniques.

Methods: Leveraging a small dataset that includes sociodemographic and clinical profiles of diabetic and non-diabetic individuals, we employed a diverse set of statistical and AI models for predictive purposes and assessment of DM risk factors. The statistical tests used were Student's t-test and Chi-square, while the AI techniques were fuzzy cognitive maps (FCM), artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machines (SVM), and XGBoost.

Results: Our statistical models facilitated an in-depth exploration of variable associations, while the resulting AI models demonstrated exceptional efficacy in DM classification. In particular, the XGBoost model showed superior performance in accuracy, sensitivity and specificity with values of 1 for each of these metrics. On the other hand, the FCM stood out for its explainability capabilities by allowing an analysis of the variables involved in the prediction using scenario-based simulations.

Conclusions: An integrated analysis of DM using a variety of methodologies is critical for timely detection of the disease and informed clinical decision-making.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用统计和人工智能技术对糖尿病进行可解释的分析。
背景:糖尿病(DM)是一种世界范围内普遍存在的慢性疾病,需要多方面的分析方法来改善早期发现和随后降低发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在通过将社会人口学和临床数据与统计和人工智能(AI)技术相结合,对糖尿病进行可解释的分析。方法:利用一个小数据集,包括糖尿病和非糖尿病个体的社会人口学和临床资料,我们采用了一套不同的统计和人工智能模型来预测和评估糖尿病的危险因素。使用的统计检验是学生t检验和卡方检验,而人工智能技术是模糊认知图(FCM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、支持向量机(SVM)和XGBoost。结果:我们的统计模型促进了对变量关联的深入探索,而由此产生的人工智能模型在糖尿病分类中表现出卓越的功效。特别是,XGBoost模型在准确性、灵敏度和特异性方面表现出优异的性能,这些指标的每个值都为1。另一方面,FCM通过使用基于场景的模拟来分析预测中涉及的变量,从而使其可解释性能力脱颖而出。结论:使用多种方法对糖尿病进行综合分析对于及时发现疾病和知情的临床决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of the optimal deep learning model for english-Japanese machine translation of medical device adverse event terminology. Causal machine learning models for predicting low birth weight in midwife-led continuity care intervention in North Shoa Zone, Ethiopia. Improving stroke risk prediction by integrating XGBoost, optimized principal component analysis, and explainable artificial intelligence. Tough choices: the experience of family members of critically ill patients participating in ECMO treatment decision-making: a descriptive qualitative study. Patients' and plastic surgeons' experiences with an online patient decision aid for breast reconstruction: considerations for nationwide implementation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1