Joey Junarta, Muhammad U. Siddiqui, Ehab Abaza, Peter Zhang, Anjani Patel, David S. Park, Anthony Aizer, Louai Razzouk, Sunil V. Rao
{"title":"The Utility of Coronary Revascularization to Reduce Ventricular Arrhythmias in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Systematic Review","authors":"Joey Junarta, Muhammad U. Siddiqui, Ehab Abaza, Peter Zhang, Anjani Patel, David S. Park, Anthony Aizer, Louai Razzouk, Sunil V. Rao","doi":"10.1002/ccd.31361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Current guidelines recommend revascularization of significant CAD to improve survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF), polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or those who are post-cardiac arrest. However, revascularization is not recommended for CAD patients with suspected scar-mediated monomorphic VT. There is a paucity of data detailing the utility of revascularization in reducing VA in CAD patients who do not present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and are not immediately post-cardiac arrest, which is the focus of this review. Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies addressing this question. Studies that included patients presenting with ACS or those who were immediately post-cardiac arrest at the time of revascularization were excluded. In total, five studies comprising 2663 patients were reviewed.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":9650,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":"105 3","pages":"605-612"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.31361","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Current guidelines recommend revascularization of significant CAD to improve survival in patients with ventricular fibrillation (VF), polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), or those who are post-cardiac arrest. However, revascularization is not recommended for CAD patients with suspected scar-mediated monomorphic VT. There is a paucity of data detailing the utility of revascularization in reducing VA in CAD patients who do not present with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and are not immediately post-cardiac arrest, which is the focus of this review. Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies addressing this question. Studies that included patients presenting with ACS or those who were immediately post-cardiac arrest at the time of revascularization were excluded. In total, five studies comprising 2663 patients were reviewed.
室性心律失常(VA)是冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者发病和死亡的主要原因。目前的指南建议对有心室颤动(VF)、多态性室性心动过速(VT)或心脏骤停的患者进行重要CAD的血运重建术以提高生存率。然而,对于疑似有疤痕介导的单形态室速的CAD患者,不建议进行血运重建术。对于没有急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)且没有立即发生心脏骤停的CAD患者,血运重建术在降低室速方面的作用缺乏详细的数据,这是本综述的重点。我们系统地检索了Medline、Scopus和Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials,以确定解决这个问题的相关研究。包括ACS患者或在血运重建时立即发生心脏骤停的患者的研究被排除在外。总共回顾了5项研究,包括2663名患者。
期刊介绍:
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions is an international journal covering the broad field of cardiovascular diseases. Subject material includes basic and clinical information that is derived from or related to invasive and interventional coronary or peripheral vascular techniques. The journal focuses on material that will be of immediate practical value to physicians providing patient care in the clinical laboratory setting. To accomplish this, the journal publishes Preliminary Reports and Work In Progress articles that complement the traditional Original Studies, Case Reports, and Comprehensive Reviews. Perspective and insight concerning controversial subjects and evolving technologies are provided regularly through Editorial Commentaries furnished by members of the Editorial Board and other experts. Articles are subject to double-blind peer review and complete editorial evaluation prior to any decision regarding acceptability.