Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets for Eosinophilic Esophagitis up to 3 Years: an Open-Label Extension Study.

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.034
Luc Biedermann, Christoph Schlag, Alex Straumann, Alfredo J Lucendo, Stephan Miehlke, Michael Vieth, Cecilio Santander, Constanza Ciriza de Los Rios, Christoph Schmöcker, Ahmed Madisch, Petr Hruz, Jamal Hayat, Ulrike von Arnim, Albert Jan Bredenoord, Stefan Schubert, Mike Halstead, Sabrina Pfurr, Ralph Mueller, Alain M Schoepfer, Stephen Attwood
{"title":"Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Orodispersible Tablets for Eosinophilic Esophagitis up to 3 Years: an Open-Label Extension Study.","authors":"Luc Biedermann, Christoph Schlag, Alex Straumann, Alfredo J Lucendo, Stephan Miehlke, Michael Vieth, Cecilio Santander, Constanza Ciriza de Los Rios, Christoph Schmöcker, Ahmed Madisch, Petr Hruz, Jamal Hayat, Ulrike von Arnim, Albert Jan Bredenoord, Stefan Schubert, Mike Halstead, Sabrina Pfurr, Ralph Mueller, Alain M Schoepfer, Stephen Attwood","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been shown to be safe and effective in phase 3 double-blind trials of induction and 48-week maintenance therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We now analyzed the long-term efficacy and safety of BOT in a 96-week open-label extension (OLE) study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All EoE patients in the 48-week double-blind maintenance study were eligible to receive BOT treatment for up to 96 weeks. Dosage was 0.5 or 1.0 mg BOT, twice daily, at investigator's discretion. Clinical, histologic, endoscopic, quality of life, and safety measures were assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 186 patients participated in the OLE up to 96 weeks. At week 96, 81.9% of patients had clinical remission, defined as an EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI) score of ≤ 20, versus 77.7% at OLE baseline. A further 80.1% of patients were in histologic remission, defined as peak eosinophils per high-power field of <5, at week 96 versus 91.8% at OLE baseline. Mean EoE endoscopic reference scores (EREFS) were 1 at all time points measured. Mean EoE Quality of Life (EoE-QoL-A) Scale scores improved from 3.3 at OLE baseline to 3.5 at week 96. No new safety concerns were observed across 96 weeks of treatment. Suspected symptomatic candidiasis occurred at similar rates to prior BOT studies, and was predominantly mild and resolved with treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Clinical and histological remission of EoE could be maintained with BOT in a large majority of patients for up to 96 weeks, and for up to 144 weeks in patients with uninterrupted BOT therapy across all trials. No additional safety concerns were identified with long-term BOT treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02493335).</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.034","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Budesonide orodispersible tablets (BOT) have been shown to be safe and effective in phase 3 double-blind trials of induction and 48-week maintenance therapy of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). We now analyzed the long-term efficacy and safety of BOT in a 96-week open-label extension (OLE) study.

Methods: All EoE patients in the 48-week double-blind maintenance study were eligible to receive BOT treatment for up to 96 weeks. Dosage was 0.5 or 1.0 mg BOT, twice daily, at investigator's discretion. Clinical, histologic, endoscopic, quality of life, and safety measures were assessed.

Results: A total of 186 patients participated in the OLE up to 96 weeks. At week 96, 81.9% of patients had clinical remission, defined as an EoE Symptom Activity Index (EEsAI) score of ≤ 20, versus 77.7% at OLE baseline. A further 80.1% of patients were in histologic remission, defined as peak eosinophils per high-power field of <5, at week 96 versus 91.8% at OLE baseline. Mean EoE endoscopic reference scores (EREFS) were 1 at all time points measured. Mean EoE Quality of Life (EoE-QoL-A) Scale scores improved from 3.3 at OLE baseline to 3.5 at week 96. No new safety concerns were observed across 96 weeks of treatment. Suspected symptomatic candidiasis occurred at similar rates to prior BOT studies, and was predominantly mild and resolved with treatment.

Conclusions: Clinical and histological remission of EoE could be maintained with BOT in a large majority of patients for up to 96 weeks, and for up to 144 weeks in patients with uninterrupted BOT therapy across all trials. No additional safety concerns were identified with long-term BOT treatment. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02493335).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Blue Notes. Antibiotic Exposure and Risk of New-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Combination With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients With NASH/MASH and Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Phase 2 Study. Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Levels in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Infants Exposed In Utero. Complexity of Trials on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: An Ongoing Challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1