Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty plus lifestyle intervention in patients with MASH: a multicentre, sham-controlled, randomized trial.

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.027
Javier Abad, Elba Llop, María Teresa Arias-Loste, Diego Burgos-Santamaría, José Luis Martínez Porras, Paula Iruzubieta, Javier Graus, Belén Ruiz-Antoran, María Rosario Sánchez Yuste, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Agustin Albillos, Javier Crespo, José Luis Calleja
{"title":"Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty plus lifestyle intervention in patients with MASH: a multicentre, sham-controlled, randomized trial.","authors":"Javier Abad, Elba Llop, María Teresa Arias-Loste, Diego Burgos-Santamaría, José Luis Martínez Porras, Paula Iruzubieta, Javier Graus, Belén Ruiz-Antoran, María Rosario Sánchez Yuste, Manuel Romero-Gómez, Agustin Albillos, Javier Crespo, José Luis Calleja","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis(MASH) is commonly seen in biopsy proven steatotic liver disease(SLD). Life-style intervention reaching a weight loss higher than 10% promotes MASH resolution, but this goal is only achieved by a small number of patients. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty(ESG) has recently emerged as a safe and effective option to promote weight loss in obese population. We report the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled and double-blind study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESG in MASH patients METHODS: Forty patients were randomized 1:1 to ESG plus lifestyle modification vs. sham endoscopy (SE) plus lifestyle intervention. Inclusion criteria included biopsy proven MASH with NAS≥3 and fibrosis stage F0-F3. Eighteen patients from the ESG group and 19 from the ESI group completed follow-up during 72 weeks. Baseline to end of follow-up changes in body weight, liver tests, liver stiffness(VCTE) and liver histology were recorded RESULTS: Total Body weight loss(TBWL) was 9.47%(±9.38) in ESG group vs 3.91%(±5.43) in ESI group(p<0.05). Liver stiffness decreased 5.63(±7.17) KPa in ESG group vs 0.2(±5.38) KPa in ESI group(p<0.05). Steatosis was significantly reduced in ESG group(-0.94±0.87) vs ESI group(-0.26±0.99)[p= 0.033]. No differences on NAS(-1.89±2.11 vs -1.47±2.01) score neither fibrosis(-0.1±0.91 vs -0.84±1.21) was seen. In patients achieving weight loss>10% we found a significant improvement on NAS score(-4±0.94 vs. -0.81±1.62, p<0.01), but not in fibrosis stage(-0.3±1.06 vs -0.59±1.25). Only 2 patients of ESG group had adverse events that required admission that resolved conservatively in 72 hours CONCLUSION: ESG is an effective and safe method to promote weight reduction associated with significant improvement in patients with MASH and obesity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2024.10.027","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis(MASH) is commonly seen in biopsy proven steatotic liver disease(SLD). Life-style intervention reaching a weight loss higher than 10% promotes MASH resolution, but this goal is only achieved by a small number of patients. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty(ESG) has recently emerged as a safe and effective option to promote weight loss in obese population. We report the results of a multicenter, randomized, controlled and double-blind study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ESG in MASH patients METHODS: Forty patients were randomized 1:1 to ESG plus lifestyle modification vs. sham endoscopy (SE) plus lifestyle intervention. Inclusion criteria included biopsy proven MASH with NAS≥3 and fibrosis stage F0-F3. Eighteen patients from the ESG group and 19 from the ESI group completed follow-up during 72 weeks. Baseline to end of follow-up changes in body weight, liver tests, liver stiffness(VCTE) and liver histology were recorded RESULTS: Total Body weight loss(TBWL) was 9.47%(±9.38) in ESG group vs 3.91%(±5.43) in ESI group(p<0.05). Liver stiffness decreased 5.63(±7.17) KPa in ESG group vs 0.2(±5.38) KPa in ESI group(p<0.05). Steatosis was significantly reduced in ESG group(-0.94±0.87) vs ESI group(-0.26±0.99)[p= 0.033]. No differences on NAS(-1.89±2.11 vs -1.47±2.01) score neither fibrosis(-0.1±0.91 vs -0.84±1.21) was seen. In patients achieving weight loss>10% we found a significant improvement on NAS score(-4±0.94 vs. -0.81±1.62, p<0.01), but not in fibrosis stage(-0.3±1.06 vs -0.59±1.25). Only 2 patients of ESG group had adverse events that required admission that resolved conservatively in 72 hours CONCLUSION: ESG is an effective and safe method to promote weight reduction associated with significant improvement in patients with MASH and obesity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Blue Notes. Antibiotic Exposure and Risk of New-Onset Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis. Safety and Efficacy of Efruxifermin in Combination With a GLP-1 Receptor Agonist in Patients With NASH/MASH and Type 2 Diabetes in a Randomized Phase 2 Study. Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Levels in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Infants Exposed In Utero. Complexity of Trials on Pain Management in Acute Pancreatitis: An Ongoing Challenge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1