Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib.

IF 10.4 1区 生物学 Q1 GENETICS & HEREDITY Genome Medicine Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5
Alan Barnicle, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Etienne Rouleau, Karen Cadoo, Fiona Simpkins, Carol Aghajanian, Alexandra Leary, Andrés Poveda, Stephanie Lheureux, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Benoit You, Jonathan Ledermann, Ursula Matulonis, Charlie Gourley, Kirsten M Timms, Zhongwu Lai, Darren R Hodgson, Cathy E Elks, Simon Dearden, Coumaran Egile, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Elizabeth A Harrington, Jessica S Brown
{"title":"Patterns of genomic instability in > 2000 patients with ovarian cancer across six clinical trials evaluating olaparib.","authors":"Alan Barnicle, Isabelle Ray-Coquard, Etienne Rouleau, Karen Cadoo, Fiona Simpkins, Carol Aghajanian, Alexandra Leary, Andrés Poveda, Stephanie Lheureux, Eric Pujade-Lauraine, Benoit You, Jonathan Ledermann, Ursula Matulonis, Charlie Gourley, Kirsten M Timms, Zhongwu Lai, Darren R Hodgson, Cathy E Elks, Simon Dearden, Coumaran Egile, Pierre Lao-Sirieix, Elizabeth A Harrington, Jessica S Brown","doi":"10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29-58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20-55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41-58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48-66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54-69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58-74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25-60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30-71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18-29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14-52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.</p>","PeriodicalId":12645,"journal":{"name":"Genome Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"145"},"PeriodicalIF":10.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11657106/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Genome Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13073-024-01413-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The introduction of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors represented a paradigm shift in the treatment of ovarian cancer. Genomic data from patients with high-grade ovarian cancer in six phase II/III trials involving the PARP inhibitor olaparib were analyzed to better understand patterns and potential causes of genomic instability.

Patients and methods: Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) was assessed in 2147 tumor samples from SOLO1, PAOLA-1, Study 19, SOLO2, OPINION, and LIGHT using next-generation sequencing technology. Genomic instability scores (GIS) were assessed in BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 (BRCA)-mutated (BRCAm), non-BRCA homologous recombination repair-mutated (non-BRCA HRRm), and non-HRRm tumors.

Results: BRCAm was identified in 1021/2147 (47.6%) tumors. BRCAm tumors had significantly higher GIS than non-BRCAm tumors (P < 0.001) and high biallelic loss (815/838; 97.3%) regardless of germline (658/672; 97.9%) or somatic (101/108; 93.5%) BRCAm status. In non-BRCA HRRm tumors (n = 121) a similar proportion were HRD-positive (GIS ≥ 42: 55/121; 45.5%) relative to HRD-negative (GIS < 42: 52/121; 43.0%). GIS was highly variable in non-BRCA HRRm (median 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 29-58]) and non-HRRm (n = 1005; median 32 [IQR 20-55]) tumors. Gene mutations with high GIS included HRR genes BRIP1 (median 46 [IQR 41-58]), RAD51C (median 58 [IQR 48-66]), RAD51D (median 62 [IQR 54-69]), and PALB2 (median 64 [IQR 58-74]), and non-HRR genes NF1 (median 49 [IQR 25-60]) and RB1 (median 55 [IQR 30-71]). CCNE1-amplified and PIK3CA-mutated tumors had low GIS (CCNE1-amplified: median 24 [IQR 18-29]; PIK3CA-mutated: median 32 [IQR 14-52]) and were predominantly non-BRCAm.

Conclusions: These analyses provide valuable insight into patterns of genomic instability and potential drivers of HRD, besides BRCAm, in ovarian cancer and will help guide future research into the potential clinical effectiveness of anti-cancer treatments in ovarian cancer, including PARP inhibitors as well as other precision oncology agents.

Trial registration: The SOLO1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986) on April 30, 2013; the PAOLA-1 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644) on June 18, 2015 (retrospectively registered); Study 19 was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545) on September 12, 2008 (retrospectively registered); the SOLO2 trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01874353) on June 7, 2013; the OPINION trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03402841) on January 3, 2018; the LIGHT trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799) on November 4, 2016.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在6个评估奥拉帕尼的临床试验中,bbb2000例卵巢癌患者的基因组不稳定性模式
背景:引入聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂代表了卵巢癌治疗的范式转变。研究人员分析了6项涉及PARP抑制剂奥拉帕尼(olaparib)的II/III期试验中来自高级别卵巢癌患者的基因组数据,以更好地了解基因组不稳定的模式和潜在原因。患者和方法:采用新一代测序技术对来自SOLO1、PAOLA-1、Study 19、SOLO2、OPINION和LIGHT的2147份肿瘤样本进行同源重组缺陷(HRD)评估。在BRCA1和/或BRCA2 (BRCA)突变(BRCAm)、非BRCA同源重组修复突变(非BRCA HRRm)和非HRRm肿瘤中评估基因组不稳定性评分(GIS)。结果:在1021/2147例(47.6%)肿瘤中检出BRCAm。结论:这些分析为卵巢癌基因组不稳定性模式和BRCAm之外HRD的潜在驱动因素提供了有价值的见解,并将有助于指导未来卵巢癌抗癌治疗的潜在临床有效性研究,包括PARP抑制剂和其他精确肿瘤药物。试验注册:SOLO1试验于2013年4月30日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01844986)注册;PAOLA-1试验于2015年6月18日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02477644)注册(回顾性注册);研究19于2008年9月12日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00753545)注册(回顾性注册);SOLO2试验于2013年6月7日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT01874353);OPINION试验于2018年1月3日在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT03402841);LIGHT试验于2016年11月4日在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02983799)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Genome Medicine
Genome Medicine GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
20.80
自引率
0.80%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Genome Medicine is an open access journal that publishes outstanding research applying genetics, genomics, and multi-omics to understand, diagnose, and treat disease. Bridging basic science and clinical research, it covers areas such as cancer genomics, immuno-oncology, immunogenomics, infectious disease, microbiome, neurogenomics, systems medicine, clinical genomics, gene therapies, precision medicine, and clinical trials. The journal publishes original research, methods, software, and reviews to serve authors and promote broad interest and importance in the field.
期刊最新文献
Intricate interplay of CRISPR-Cas systems, anti-CRISPR proteins, and antimicrobial resistance genes in a globally successful multi-drug resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae clone. A new method for detecting mixed Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and reconstructing constituent strains provides insights into transmission. Integrating pharmacogenomics and cheminformatics with diverse disease phenotypes for cell type-guided drug discovery. Nanopore-based random genomic sampling for intraoperative molecular diagnosis. Meta-analyses of mouse and human prostate single-cell transcriptomes reveal widespread epithelial plasticity in tissue regression, regeneration, and cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1