Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning.

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY Modern Pathology Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686
Matthew Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Brian Jackson, Octavia Palmer, Shyam Visweswaran, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mustafa Deebajah, Hooman Rashidi
{"title":"Ethical and Bias Considerations in Artificial Intelligence (AI)/Machine Learning.","authors":"Matthew Hanna, Liron Pantanowitz, Brian Jackson, Octavia Palmer, Shyam Visweswaran, Joshua Pantanowitz, Mustafa Deebajah, Hooman Rashidi","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As artificial intelligence (AI) gains prominence in pathology and medicine, the ethical implications and potential biases within such integrated AI models will require careful scrutiny. Ethics and bias are important considerations in our practice settings, especially as increased number of machine learning (ML) systems are being integrated within our various medical domains. Such machine learning based systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in specified tasks such as but not limited to image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. However, the potential bias that may exist within such AI-ML models can also inadvertently lead to unfair and potentially detrimental outcomes. The source of bias within such machine learning models can be due to numerous factors but can be typically put in three main buckets (data bias, development bias and interaction bias). These could be due to the training data, algorithmic bias, feature engineering and selection issues, clinical and institutional bias (i.e. practice variability), reporting bias, and temporal bias (i.e. changes in technology, clinical practice or disease patterns). Therefore despite the potential of these AI-ML applications, their deployment in our day to day practice also raises noteworthy ethical concerns. To address ethics and bias in medicine, a comprehensive evaluation process is required which will encompass all aspects such systems, from model development through clinical deployment. Addressing these biases is crucial to ensure that AI-ML systems remain fair, transparent, and beneficial to all. This review will discuss the relevant ethical and bias considerations in AI-ML specifically within the pathology and medical domain.</p>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":" ","pages":"100686"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100686","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As artificial intelligence (AI) gains prominence in pathology and medicine, the ethical implications and potential biases within such integrated AI models will require careful scrutiny. Ethics and bias are important considerations in our practice settings, especially as increased number of machine learning (ML) systems are being integrated within our various medical domains. Such machine learning based systems, have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in specified tasks such as but not limited to image recognition, natural language processing, and predictive analytics. However, the potential bias that may exist within such AI-ML models can also inadvertently lead to unfair and potentially detrimental outcomes. The source of bias within such machine learning models can be due to numerous factors but can be typically put in three main buckets (data bias, development bias and interaction bias). These could be due to the training data, algorithmic bias, feature engineering and selection issues, clinical and institutional bias (i.e. practice variability), reporting bias, and temporal bias (i.e. changes in technology, clinical practice or disease patterns). Therefore despite the potential of these AI-ML applications, their deployment in our day to day practice also raises noteworthy ethical concerns. To address ethics and bias in medicine, a comprehensive evaluation process is required which will encompass all aspects such systems, from model development through clinical deployment. Addressing these biases is crucial to ensure that AI-ML systems remain fair, transparent, and beneficial to all. This review will discuss the relevant ethical and bias considerations in AI-ML specifically within the pathology and medical domain.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能(AI)/机器学习中的伦理和偏见考虑。
随着人工智能(AI)在病理学和医学领域的突出地位,这种集成人工智能模型中的伦理影响和潜在偏见将需要仔细审查。在我们的实践环境中,伦理和偏见是重要的考虑因素,特别是随着越来越多的机器学习(ML)系统被集成到我们的各个医疗领域。这种基于机器学习的系统在特定任务中表现出了非凡的能力,例如但不限于图像识别、自然语言处理和预测分析。然而,这种AI-ML模型中可能存在的潜在偏见也可能无意中导致不公平和潜在有害的结果。这种机器学习模型中的偏差来源可能是由于许多因素造成的,但通常可以分为三大类(数据偏差、发展偏差和交互偏差)。这可能是由于训练数据、算法偏差、特征工程和选择问题、临床和机构偏差(即实践可变性)、报告偏差和时间偏差(即技术、临床实践或疾病模式的变化)。因此,尽管这些AI-ML应用程序具有潜力,但它们在我们日常实践中的部署也引起了值得注意的伦理问题。为了解决医学中的伦理和偏见问题,需要一个全面的评估过程,该过程将涵盖这类系统从模型开发到临床部署的所有方面。解决这些偏见对于确保AI-ML系统保持公平、透明和对所有人有益至关重要。这篇综述将讨论AI-ML中相关的伦理和偏见考虑,特别是在病理学和医学领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
期刊最新文献
Classification of Fibro-osseous Tumors in the Craniofacial Bones using DNA Methylation and Copy Number Alterations. Diffuse Cyclin D1 and SPINK1 Expression in Gastric Oxyntic Gland Neoplasms: Promising Diagnostic Markers Identified by Spatial Transcriptome Analysis. Ex Vivo Fluorescence Confocal Microscopy for intraoperative evaluations of staple lines and surgical margins in specimens of the lung - a proof-of-concept study. Digital Profiling of Immune Biomarkers in Breast Cancer: Relation to Anthracycline Benefit. TP53 Wild-type, HPV-independent Anal Growth/(intra)Epithelial Lesion (ANGEL): a Potential Precursor of Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1