Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241
Siobhan Manners, Lynn B Meuleners, Jonathon Q Ng, Joanne Wood, William Morgan, Nigel Morlet
{"title":"Binocular Visual Field Loss and Crash Risk: An eFOVID Population-Based Study.","authors":"Siobhan Manners, Lynn B Meuleners, Jonathon Q Ng, Joanne Wood, William Morgan, Nigel Morlet","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Visual field loss poses a high personal cost to those affected, significantly impacting activities of daily living, including driving. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between visual field loss and crash risk. This study examined the association between severity and location of binocular visual field loss and motor vehicle crashes in older adults aged 50+, using linked population data over a 29-year study period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a database of visual field tests obtained from ophthalmologists in Western Australia (WA) between 1990 and 2019, deficits in field sensitivity were identified and classified into three severities across five regions. This was linked to other government administrative databases including crash data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 31,296 people, 4,307 (13.76%) older drivers were involved in 5,537 vehicle crashes. Binocular visual field loss (regardless of severity and location) significantly increased the odds of a crash by 84% (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.97). Severe visual field loss significantly increased the odds of a crash by 98% in the upper left quadrant (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.06), 97% in the lower left (OR 1.97; CI 1.80-2.16), 89% in the lower right (OR 1.89; CI 1.72-2.06) and 95% in the upper right quadrant (OR 1.95; CI 1.78-2.14).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The large population-based study provided robust estimates on the degree of severity and specific locations of visual field loss that threaten safe driving and objective evidence on the usefulness of linking large customised ophthalmic databases to crash records for developing 'fitness to drive' guidelines for older drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2434241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Visual field loss poses a high personal cost to those affected, significantly impacting activities of daily living, including driving. However, there is conflicting evidence on the association between visual field loss and crash risk. This study examined the association between severity and location of binocular visual field loss and motor vehicle crashes in older adults aged 50+, using linked population data over a 29-year study period.

Methods: Using a database of visual field tests obtained from ophthalmologists in Western Australia (WA) between 1990 and 2019, deficits in field sensitivity were identified and classified into three severities across five regions. This was linked to other government administrative databases including crash data.

Results: Of 31,296 people, 4,307 (13.76%) older drivers were involved in 5,537 vehicle crashes. Binocular visual field loss (regardless of severity and location) significantly increased the odds of a crash by 84% (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.71-1.97). Severe visual field loss significantly increased the odds of a crash by 98% in the upper left quadrant (OR 1.98; 95% CI 1.70-2.06), 97% in the lower left (OR 1.97; CI 1.80-2.16), 89% in the lower right (OR 1.89; CI 1.72-2.06) and 95% in the upper right quadrant (OR 1.95; CI 1.78-2.14).

Conclusion: The large population-based study provided robust estimates on the degree of severity and specific locations of visual field loss that threaten safe driving and objective evidence on the usefulness of linking large customised ophthalmic databases to crash records for developing 'fitness to drive' guidelines for older drivers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双眼视野丧失和碰撞风险:一项基于eFOVID人群的研究。
目的:视野丧失会给患者带来很高的个人成本,严重影响日常生活活动,包括驾驶。然而,关于视野丧失和撞车风险之间的关系,有相互矛盾的证据。本研究调查了50岁以上老年人双眼视野丧失的严重程度和位置与机动车碰撞之间的关系,使用了29年研究期间的相关人口数据。方法:使用西澳大利亚州眼科医生1990年至2019年的视野测试数据库,确定视野敏感性缺陷,并将其分为五个地区的三个严重程度。这与其他政府管理数据库相连,包括坠机数据。结果:在31296人中,有4307名(13.76%)老年司机参与了5537起交通事故。双眼视野丧失(无论严重程度和位置)使坠机几率显著增加84% (OR 1.84;95% ci 1.71-1.97)。严重的视野丧失显著增加了左上象限98%的撞车几率(OR 1.98;95% CI 1.70-2.06),左下角为97% (OR 1.97;CI 1.80-2.16),右下方89% (OR 1.89;CI 1.72-2.06),右上象限95% (OR 1.95;可信区间1.78 - -2.14)。结论:这项以人群为基础的大型研究提供了对威胁安全驾驶的视野丧失的严重程度和特定位置的可靠估计,并提供了客观证据,证明将大型定制眼科数据库与碰撞记录联系起来,有助于为老年司机制定“健康驾驶”指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
The Burden of Blindness and Vision Impairment in the Middle East and North Africa: A Global Burden of Disease 2019 Perspective. A Cross-Sectional Study of Demographic Representativeness of Glaucoma Patient Populations in Clinical Trials from 2006 to 2022. Exploring the Associations of Obesity and Glycemic Traits with Retinal Vein Occlusion: A Univariate and Multivariable Mendelian Randomization Study. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing Diversity and Representation in Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Trials in the U.S. Impact of Ambient Air Pollution on Reduced Visual Acuity Among Children and Adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1