Association of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status with outcomes of a smoking cessation intervention provided in the lung cancer screening setting.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Preventive medicine Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108207
Jaqueline C Avila, Efren J Flores, Yan-Jhu Su, Jennifer S Haas, Elyse R Park, Nancy A Rigotti
{"title":"Association of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status with outcomes of a smoking cessation intervention provided in the lung cancer screening setting.","authors":"Jaqueline C Avila, Efren J Flores, Yan-Jhu Su, Jennifer S Haas, Elyse R Park, Nancy A Rigotti","doi":"10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lung cancer screening (LCS) offers a teachable moment for smoking cessation. This study assesses whether individual- or neighborhood-level SES is associated with tobacco abstinence and completion of a smoking cessation intervention in the LCS context.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis of a clinical trial (NCT03611881) that tested the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment for smokers scheduled for LCS (N = 615) in eastern Massachusetts, USA from 2019 to 2024. Outcomes were self-reported 7-day smoking abstinence and study follow-up completion at 6-months. Independent variables were individual SES (high school or less [low SES] vs. post-high school education [high SES]); neighborhood SES (Area Deprivation Index [ADI], range: 0-100, categorized as: highest 15 % [low SES] vs. remaining 85 % scores [high SES]), and a combination of both measures. Logistic regression models tested the association between outcomes and SES measures, adjusted for covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>32 % of participants had low individual SES. The mean sample ADI was 19.9 (SD: 12.8). Smoking cessation was higher among those with high vs. low neighborhood SES (15.7 % vs. 7.4 %, p-value = 0.03). Study completion was marginally higher among those with high vs. low individual SES (84.5 % vs. 78.1 %, p = 0.05). In multivariable models, these associations were not significant, but individuals with high individual and low neighborhood SES were more likely to complete the study than those with both low individual and low neighborhood SES, (OR: 6.04, 95 %CI: 1.47-24.7).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Individual and neighborhood SES were not independently associated with the study outcomes in the multivariable analysis, but combinations of individual and neighborhood SES differentially affected treatment completion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20339,"journal":{"name":"Preventive medicine","volume":" ","pages":"108207"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Preventive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108207","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Lung cancer screening (LCS) offers a teachable moment for smoking cessation. This study assesses whether individual- or neighborhood-level SES is associated with tobacco abstinence and completion of a smoking cessation intervention in the LCS context.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a clinical trial (NCT03611881) that tested the effectiveness of smoking cessation treatment for smokers scheduled for LCS (N = 615) in eastern Massachusetts, USA from 2019 to 2024. Outcomes were self-reported 7-day smoking abstinence and study follow-up completion at 6-months. Independent variables were individual SES (high school or less [low SES] vs. post-high school education [high SES]); neighborhood SES (Area Deprivation Index [ADI], range: 0-100, categorized as: highest 15 % [low SES] vs. remaining 85 % scores [high SES]), and a combination of both measures. Logistic regression models tested the association between outcomes and SES measures, adjusted for covariates.

Results: 32 % of participants had low individual SES. The mean sample ADI was 19.9 (SD: 12.8). Smoking cessation was higher among those with high vs. low neighborhood SES (15.7 % vs. 7.4 %, p-value = 0.03). Study completion was marginally higher among those with high vs. low individual SES (84.5 % vs. 78.1 %, p = 0.05). In multivariable models, these associations were not significant, but individuals with high individual and low neighborhood SES were more likely to complete the study than those with both low individual and low neighborhood SES, (OR: 6.04, 95 %CI: 1.47-24.7).

Conclusion: Individual and neighborhood SES were not independently associated with the study outcomes in the multivariable analysis, but combinations of individual and neighborhood SES differentially affected treatment completion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
个人和社区社会经济地位与肺癌筛查中戒烟干预结果的关系
背景:肺癌筛查(LCS)为戒烟提供了一个教育时刻。本研究评估了个人或社区水平的SES是否与LCS背景下的戒烟和戒烟干预的完成有关。方法:对一项临床试验(NCT03611881)进行二次分析,该试验测试了2019年至2024年美国马萨诸塞州东部LCS吸烟者戒烟治疗的有效性(N = 615)。结果是自我报告戒烟7天,并在6个月时完成研究随访。自变量为个人社会经济地位(高中及以下学历[低社会经济地位]vs.高中后学历[高社会经济地位]);社区SES(区域剥夺指数[ADI],范围:0-100,分为:最高的15 %[低SES]与其余的85 %分数[高SES]),以及两种措施的组合。逻辑回归模型检验了结果与SES测量之间的关联,并对协变量进行了调整。结果:32% %的参与者有低个体社会地位。样本平均ADI为19.9 (SD: 12.8)。社区社会经济地位高低者戒烟率较高(15.7 % vs. 7.4 %,p值 = 0.03)。社会经济地位高与低个体的研究完成率略高(84.5 %对78.1 %,p = 0.05)。在多变量模型中,这些关联并不显著,但高个体和低社区SES的个体比低个体和低社区SES的个体更有可能完成研究(OR: 6.04, 95 %CI: 1.47-24.7)。结论:在多变量分析中,个体和社区经济地位与研究结果没有独立的相关性,但个体和社区经济地位的组合对治疗完成度有差异影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Preventive medicine
Preventive medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Founded in 1972 by Ernst Wynder, Preventive Medicine is an international scholarly journal that provides prompt publication of original articles on the science and practice of disease prevention, health promotion, and public health policymaking. Preventive Medicine aims to reward innovation. It will favor insightful observational studies, thoughtful explorations of health data, unsuspected new angles for existing hypotheses, robust randomized controlled trials, and impartial systematic reviews. Preventive Medicine''s ultimate goal is to publish research that will have an impact on the work of practitioners of disease prevention and health promotion, as well as of related disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Proximity to public transportation and incidence of depression risk among older adults: A three-year longitudinal analysis from the Japan Gerontological evaluation study. Trends in modifiable risk factors for dementia among midlife adults in the United States: The National Health and nutrition examination survey 1999-2018. Association of individual and neighborhood socioeconomic status with outcomes of a smoking cessation intervention provided in the lung cancer screening setting. Relationship between self-rated health, physical frailty, and incidence of disability among Japanese community-dwelling older adults: A longitudinal prospective cohort study. Association between physical activity-related metabolic signature and cardiometabolic diseases and multimorbidity: A cohort study from UK biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1