Interobserver agreement in Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics implementation.

IF 1.2 Q3 NURSING Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem Pub Date : 2024-12-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0361
Manuela Beatriz Velho, Luciana Santos Pimentel, Fernanda Amâncio Soares da Silva, Alberto Trapani Junior, Thayná Ventura, Adaiana Fátima Almeida, Roberta Costa, Roxana Knobel
{"title":"Interobserver agreement in Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics implementation.","authors":"Manuela Beatriz Velho, Luciana Santos Pimentel, Fernanda Amâncio Soares da Silva, Alberto Trapani Junior, Thayná Ventura, Adaiana Fátima Almeida, Roberta Costa, Roxana Knobel","doi":"10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>to analyze interobserver agreement in the Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics protocol implementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>a cross-sectional study carried out during Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics implementation, conducted in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil with 891 participants in January 2020. Descriptive and interobserver agreement analysis was carried out using the Kappa coefficient in the risk stratification assigned by the triage nurse and reviewed by the researcher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>around half of the calls (55.6%) were stratified as not very urgent (green), followed by urgent (yellow) (31.8%), very urgent (orange) (9.3%), not urgent (blue) (3.4%) and no emerging stratification (red). Agreement analysis of revised stratification found Kappa values of 0.20 (blue), 0.54 (green), 0.77 (yellow) and 0.80 (orange).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>most appointments were non-urgent. The agreement analysis between the revised and assigned risk stratification revealed greater interobserver agreement as the priority level increased.</p>","PeriodicalId":21200,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","volume":"77 5","pages":"e20230361"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11654229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira De Enfermagem","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2023-0361","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: to analyze interobserver agreement in the Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics protocol implementation.

Methods: a cross-sectional study carried out during Reception and Risk Stratification in Obstetrics implementation, conducted in a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil with 891 participants in January 2020. Descriptive and interobserver agreement analysis was carried out using the Kappa coefficient in the risk stratification assigned by the triage nurse and reviewed by the researcher.

Results: around half of the calls (55.6%) were stratified as not very urgent (green), followed by urgent (yellow) (31.8%), very urgent (orange) (9.3%), not urgent (blue) (3.4%) and no emerging stratification (red). Agreement analysis of revised stratification found Kappa values of 0.20 (blue), 0.54 (green), 0.77 (yellow) and 0.80 (orange).

Conclusions: most appointments were non-urgent. The agreement analysis between the revised and assigned risk stratification revealed greater interobserver agreement as the priority level increased.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产科实施中接受和风险分层的观察者间协议。
目的:分析产科协议执行中接受和风险分层的观察者间一致性。方法:2020年1月在巴西南部的一家三级医院进行了一项横断面研究,在产科实施的接收和风险分层期间进行了研究,共有891名参与者。描述性和观察者间的一致性分析使用Kappa系数进行风险分层,由分诊护士分配,并由研究人员审查。结果:大约一半(55.6%)的呼叫被分层为不太紧急(绿色),其次是紧急(黄色)(31.8%),非常紧急(橙色)(9.3%),不紧急(蓝色)(3.4%)和没有出现分层(红色)。修正分层的一致性分析发现Kappa值为0.20(蓝色)、0.54(绿色)、0.77(黄色)和0.80(橙色)。结论:大多数预约是非紧急的。修订后的风险分层和指定的风险分层之间的一致性分析显示,随着优先级的增加,观察者之间的一致性也越来越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
477
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem created in 1932, March 20 is the official publication of the Associação Brasileira de Enfermagem (Brazilian Nursing Association) has as purpose to disseminate the scientific production from different nursing interest areas of knowledge, including those which express the political project of the Association. The Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem is the oldest journal of the Brazilian nursing. Its first title was "Annaes de Enfermagem" from 1932 to 1941, being entitled Anais de Enfermagem" until 1955, when its title was changed to the current.
期刊最新文献
ERRATUM. ERRATUM. Individualization of implantable devices in Brazil. An overview of the implementation of the first doctorate program in nursing in the Northern region. Evaluation of care for people with HIV in Primary Health Care: construct validation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1