Integrating artificial intelligence in renal cell carcinoma: evaluating ChatGPT's performance in educating patients and trainees.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-05-21 DOI:10.21037/tcr-23-2234
J Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Keyan Salari, Richard S Matulewicz, Eric A Singer, Shawn Dason
{"title":"Integrating artificial intelligence in renal cell carcinoma: evaluating ChatGPT's performance in educating patients and trainees.","authors":"J Patrick Mershon, Tasha Posid, Keyan Salari, Richard S Matulewicz, Eric A Singer, Shawn Dason","doi":"10.21037/tcr-23-2234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>OpenAI's ChatGPT is a large language model-based artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot that can be used to answer unique, user-generated questions without direct training on specific content. Large language models have significant potential in urologic education. We reviewed the primary data surrounding the use of large language models in urology. We also reported findings of our primary study assessing the performance of ChatGPT in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For our primary study, we utilized three professional society guidelines addressing RCC to generate fifteen content questions. These questions were inputted into ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT responses along with pre- and post-content assessment questions regarding ChatGPT were then presented to evaluators. Evaluators consisted of four urologic oncologists and four non-clinical staff members. Medline was reviewed for additional studies pertaining to the use of ChatGPT in urologic education.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that all assessors rated ChatGPT highly on the accuracy and usefulness of information provided with overall mean scores of 3.64 [±0.62 standard deviation (SD)] and 3.58 (±0.75) out of 5, respectively. Clinicians and non-clinicians did not differ in their scoring of responses (P=0.37). Completing content assessment improved confidence in the accuracy of ChatGPT's information (P=0.01) and increased agreement that it should be used for medical education (P=0.007). Attitudes towards use for patient education did not change (P=0.30). We also review the current state of the literature regarding ChatGPT use for patient and trainee education and discuss future steps towards optimization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ChatGPT has significant potential utility in medical education if it can continue to provide accurate and useful information. We have found it to be a useful adjunct to expert human guidance both for medical trainee and, less so, for patient education. Further work is needed to validate ChatGPT before widespread adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"6246-6254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651803/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-23-2234","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: OpenAI's ChatGPT is a large language model-based artificial intelligence (AI) chatbot that can be used to answer unique, user-generated questions without direct training on specific content. Large language models have significant potential in urologic education. We reviewed the primary data surrounding the use of large language models in urology. We also reported findings of our primary study assessing the performance of ChatGPT in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) education.

Methods: For our primary study, we utilized three professional society guidelines addressing RCC to generate fifteen content questions. These questions were inputted into ChatGPT 3.5. ChatGPT responses along with pre- and post-content assessment questions regarding ChatGPT were then presented to evaluators. Evaluators consisted of four urologic oncologists and four non-clinical staff members. Medline was reviewed for additional studies pertaining to the use of ChatGPT in urologic education.

Results: We found that all assessors rated ChatGPT highly on the accuracy and usefulness of information provided with overall mean scores of 3.64 [±0.62 standard deviation (SD)] and 3.58 (±0.75) out of 5, respectively. Clinicians and non-clinicians did not differ in their scoring of responses (P=0.37). Completing content assessment improved confidence in the accuracy of ChatGPT's information (P=0.01) and increased agreement that it should be used for medical education (P=0.007). Attitudes towards use for patient education did not change (P=0.30). We also review the current state of the literature regarding ChatGPT use for patient and trainee education and discuss future steps towards optimization.

Conclusions: ChatGPT has significant potential utility in medical education if it can continue to provide accurate and useful information. We have found it to be a useful adjunct to expert human guidance both for medical trainee and, less so, for patient education. Further work is needed to validate ChatGPT before widespread adoption.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of mecapegfilgrastim in preventing neutropenia in patients with head and neck cancer: a multicenter, prospective, observational, real-world study. Slamming hepatocellular carcinoma: targeting immunosuppressive macrophages via SLAMF7 reprograms the tumor microenvironment. Targeting the EZH2-SLFN11 pathway-a lesson in developing molecularly-informed treatments for recurrent small cell lung cancer. The clinicopathological significance of BRI3BP in women with invasive breast cancer. Treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related colitis: a narrative review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1