Development of prediction models for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer based on machine learning: a population-level study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY Translational cancer research Pub Date : 2024-11-30 Epub Date: 2024-11-18 DOI:10.21037/tcr-24-1194
Yuncan Xing, Guanhua Yu, Zheng Jiang, Zheng Wang
{"title":"Development of prediction models for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer based on machine learning: a population-level study.","authors":"Yuncan Xing, Guanhua Yu, Zheng Jiang, Zheng Wang","doi":"10.21037/tcr-24-1194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Liver metastasis (LM) is of vital importance in making treatment-related decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to develop and validate prediction models for LM in CRC by making use of machine learning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We selected patients diagnosed with CRC from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Four machine-learning methods, eXtreme gradient boost (XGB), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM), were employed to develop a predictive model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves and calibration curves were adopted to evaluate the model performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) technique was chosen for visual analysis to enhance the interpretation of the outcomes of models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 51,632 patients suffering from CRC were selected from the SEER database. Excellent accuracy of machine learning models was showed from ROC curves. In both the training and validation cohorts, calibration curves for the likelihood of LM demonstrated a high degree of concordance between model prediction and actual observation. The DCA indicated that each machine learning model can yield net benefits for both treat-none and treat-all strategies. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and N stage were identified as the most significant risk factors for LM based on the SHAP summary plot of the RF and XGB models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The XGB and RF were the best machine learning models among the four algorithms, of which CEA and N stage were identified as the most important risk factors related to LM.</p>","PeriodicalId":23216,"journal":{"name":"Translational cancer research","volume":"13 11","pages":"5943-5952"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11651848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/tcr-24-1194","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Liver metastasis (LM) is of vital importance in making treatment-related decisions in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim of our study was to develop and validate prediction models for LM in CRC by making use of machine learning.

Methods: We selected patients diagnosed with CRC from 2010 to 2015 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Four machine-learning methods, eXtreme gradient boost (XGB), decision tree (DT), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM), were employed to develop a predictive model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, decision curve analysis (DCA) curves and calibration curves were adopted to evaluate the model performance. The SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) technique was chosen for visual analysis to enhance the interpretation of the outcomes of models.

Results: A total of 51,632 patients suffering from CRC were selected from the SEER database. Excellent accuracy of machine learning models was showed from ROC curves. In both the training and validation cohorts, calibration curves for the likelihood of LM demonstrated a high degree of concordance between model prediction and actual observation. The DCA indicated that each machine learning model can yield net benefits for both treat-none and treat-all strategies. Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and N stage were identified as the most significant risk factors for LM based on the SHAP summary plot of the RF and XGB models.

Conclusions: The XGB and RF were the best machine learning models among the four algorithms, of which CEA and N stage were identified as the most important risk factors related to LM.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于机器学习的结直肠癌肝转移预测模型的发展:一项人群水平的研究。
背景:肝转移(LM)对结直肠癌(CRC)患者的治疗相关决策至关重要。我们研究的目的是利用机器学习开发和验证CRC中LM的预测模型。方法:我们从监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库中选择2010年至2015年诊断为结直肠癌的患者。采用极端梯度增强(eXtreme gradient boost, XGB)、决策树(decision tree, DT)、随机森林(random forest, RF)和支持向量机(support vector machine, SVM)四种机器学习方法建立预测模型。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线、决策曲线分析(DCA)曲线和标定曲线评价模型的性能。选择SHapley加性解释(SHAP)技术进行可视化分析,以增强对模型结果的解释。结果:从SEER数据库中共筛选出51632例结直肠癌患者。ROC曲线显示了机器学习模型的良好准确性。在训练队列和验证队列中,LM似然的校准曲线在模型预测和实际观测之间表现出高度的一致性。DCA表明,每种机器学习模型都可以为“不治疗”和“所有治疗”策略产生净收益。根据RF和XGB模型的SHAP总结图,癌胚抗原(CEA)和N分期是LM最重要的危险因素。结论:在4种算法中,XGB和RF是最好的机器学习模型,其中CEA和N分期是与LM相关的最重要的危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
252
期刊介绍: Translational Cancer Research (Transl Cancer Res TCR; Print ISSN: 2218-676X; Online ISSN 2219-6803; http://tcr.amegroups.com/) is an Open Access, peer-reviewed journal, indexed in Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE). TCR publishes laboratory studies of novel therapeutic interventions as well as clinical trials which evaluate new treatment paradigms for cancer; results of novel research investigations which bridge the laboratory and clinical settings including risk assessment, cellular and molecular characterization, prevention, detection, diagnosis and treatment of human cancers with the overall goal of improving the clinical care of cancer patients. The focus of TCR is original, peer-reviewed, science-based research that successfully advances clinical medicine toward the goal of improving patients'' quality of life. The editors and an international advisory group of scientists and clinician-scientists as well as other experts will hold TCR articles to the high-quality standards. We accept Original Articles as well as Review Articles, Editorials and Brief Articles.
期刊最新文献
Exploration of key pathogenic mechanisms and potential intervention targets of the traditional Chinese medicine Coptis chinensis in the treatment of cervical cancer based on network pharmacology and molecular docking techniques. FTO-mediated m6A demethylation of SERPINE1 mRNA promotes tumor progression in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. How to select between osimertinib or afatinib in P-loop and αC-helix compressing (G719X, S768I) or classical-like (L861Q) EGFR mutations: what preclinical models and clinical data have taught us in the early 2020s. Identification and validation of LINC02381 as a biomarker associated with lymph node metastasis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors plus paclitaxel-based chemotherapy vs. oxaliplatin-based therapy as first-line treatment for patients with HER2-negative unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer: results of a multicenter retrospective study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1