What about the donor site morbidity - how invasive is the free latissimus dorsi flap?

IF 2.8 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Bone & Joint Open Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0058.R1
Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Marc Hellweg, Maximilian Hirschmann, Constanze Kuhlmann, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl
{"title":"What about the donor site morbidity - how invasive is the free latissimus dorsi flap?","authors":"Nikolaus Wachtel, Riccardo E Giunta, Marc Hellweg, Maximilian Hirschmann, Constanze Kuhlmann, Nicholas Moellhoff, Denis Ehrl","doi":"10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0058.R1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The free latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flap represents a workhorse procedure in the field of trauma and plastic surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients with regard to the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of a free LDM flap.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A control group (n = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess the differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder joint with regard to handedness of patients. Additionally, in 40 patients with free LDM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We measured higher values for all parameters assessing force in the shoulder joint on the dominant side of patients in the control group. Moreover, LDM flap harvest caused a significant reduction in strength in the glenohumeral joint in all functions of the LDM that were assessed, ranging from 9.0% to 13.8%. Equally, we found a significantly reduced ROM in the shoulder at the side of the flap harvest. For both parameters, this effect was diminished, when the flap harvest took place on the dominant side of the patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LDM flap surgery leads to a significant impairment of the strength and ROM in the shoulder joint. Moreover, the donor morbidity must be differentiated with regard to handedness: harvest on the non-dominant side potentiates the already existing difference in strength and ROM. Conversely, if the harvest takes place on the dominant side of the patient, this difference is diminished.</p>","PeriodicalId":34103,"journal":{"name":"Bone & Joint Open","volume":"5 12","pages":"1114-1119"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11655141/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bone & Joint Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.512.BJO-2024-0058.R1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The free latissimus dorsi muscle (LDM) flap represents a workhorse procedure in the field of trauma and plastic surgery. However, only a small number of studies have examined this large group of patients with regard to the morbidity of flap harvest. The aim of this prospective study was therefore to objectively investigate the morbidity of a free LDM flap.

Methods: A control group (n = 100) without surgery was recruited to assess the differences in strength and range of motion (ROM) in the shoulder joint with regard to handedness of patients. Additionally, in 40 patients with free LDM flap surgery, these parameters were assessed in an identical manner.

Results: We measured higher values for all parameters assessing force in the shoulder joint on the dominant side of patients in the control group. Moreover, LDM flap harvest caused a significant reduction in strength in the glenohumeral joint in all functions of the LDM that were assessed, ranging from 9.0% to 13.8%. Equally, we found a significantly reduced ROM in the shoulder at the side of the flap harvest. For both parameters, this effect was diminished, when the flap harvest took place on the dominant side of the patient.

Conclusion: LDM flap surgery leads to a significant impairment of the strength and ROM in the shoulder joint. Moreover, the donor morbidity must be differentiated with regard to handedness: harvest on the non-dominant side potentiates the already existing difference in strength and ROM. Conversely, if the harvest takes place on the dominant side of the patient, this difference is diminished.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供体部位的发病率如何?游离背阔肌瓣的侵入性如何?
目的:游离背阔肌(LDM)皮瓣是创伤和整形外科领域的主力手术。然而,只有少数研究检查了这一大群患者关于皮瓣摘取的发病率。因此,这项前瞻性研究的目的是客观地调查游离LDM皮瓣的发病率。方法:招募未手术的对照组(n = 100),评估患者的利手性在肩关节力量和活动范围(ROM)方面的差异。此外,在40例游离LDM皮瓣手术患者中,以相同的方式评估这些参数。结果:在对照组中,我们测量到的所有评估患者优势侧肩关节受力的参数值都更高。此外,LDM皮瓣切除导致LDM所有功能的盂肱关节强度显著降低,幅度从9.0%到13.8%不等。同样,我们发现皮瓣侧肩部的ROM明显减少。对于这两个参数,当皮瓣在患者的优势侧进行时,这种影响减弱。结论:LDM皮瓣手术对肩关节的力量和活动度有明显的损害。此外,供体发病率必须根据手性进行区分:非优势侧的收获增强了已经存在的力量和ROM差异。相反,如果患者的优势侧收获,这种差异就会减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bone & Joint Open
Bone & Joint Open ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Prioritizing orthopaedic evidence uncertainties : expert consensus based on a modified DELPHI study and a focus group. Outcomes of conversion total hip arthroplasty following previous hip fracture surgery. The Zweymüller primary stem is a reliable, effective, and less invasive implant in revision hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type I and II defects. Risk factors for valgus subsidence in uncemented medial unicompartimental knee arthroplasty. Total versus robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee replacement (TRAKER) for medial compartment osteorthritis: a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1