An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5
Jingjing Cheng, Xianming Kuang, Ping Zhou, Weiran Sha
{"title":"An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China.","authors":"Jingjing Cheng, Xianming Kuang, Ping Zhou, Weiran Sha","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China's primary healthcare (PHC) system, together with rural healthcare services, remains the Achilles' heel in the national healthcare system. Healthcare workers, specifically village doctors, are an integral part of the healthcare system. Using the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression analysis, this study aims to investigate the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on medical resources and services in China, as well as determine how different types of healthcare work influence efficiency. Compared with other types of healthcare workers, village doctors exerted a prominent impact on provincial and rural efficiency at all stages and played a key role in augmenting the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on health outcomes. Besides, township health centers (THCs) and village clinics (VCs) faced administrative overstaffing, mainly involving pharmacists, other nonmedical technologists, and health administrators, which adversely affected the efficiency of healthcare expenditures. This study suggests that the higher the proportion of these non-village doctor positions (e.g., pharmacists, health administrators, and nonmedical technologists) in THCs and VCs, the lower the efficiency of China's PHC system. Overall, the priority should be enhancing the training and remuneration of village doctors and other healthcare workers in rural areas to further enhance their performance and increase the overall efficiency of China's healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660505/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's primary healthcare (PHC) system, together with rural healthcare services, remains the Achilles' heel in the national healthcare system. Healthcare workers, specifically village doctors, are an integral part of the healthcare system. Using the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression analysis, this study aims to investigate the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on medical resources and services in China, as well as determine how different types of healthcare work influence efficiency. Compared with other types of healthcare workers, village doctors exerted a prominent impact on provincial and rural efficiency at all stages and played a key role in augmenting the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on health outcomes. Besides, township health centers (THCs) and village clinics (VCs) faced administrative overstaffing, mainly involving pharmacists, other nonmedical technologists, and health administrators, which adversely affected the efficiency of healthcare expenditures. This study suggests that the higher the proportion of these non-village doctor positions (e.g., pharmacists, health administrators, and nonmedical technologists) in THCs and VCs, the lower the efficiency of China's PHC system. Overall, the priority should be enhancing the training and remuneration of village doctors and other healthcare workers in rural areas to further enhance their performance and increase the overall efficiency of China's healthcare system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国卫生支出技术效率的影响因素分析。
中国的初级卫生保健(PHC)体系以及农村卫生保健服务仍然是国家卫生保健体系中的阿喀琉斯之踵。卫生保健工作者,特别是乡村医生,是卫生保健系统的一个组成部分。本研究采用两阶段数据包络分析(DEA)和Tobit回归分析,旨在探讨中国医疗卫生支出对医疗资源和服务的效率,并确定不同类型医疗卫生工作对效率的影响。与其他类型的卫生保健工作者相比,乡村医生对省级和农村各阶段的效率影响显著,在提高卫生保健支出对健康结果的效率方面发挥着关键作用。此外,乡镇卫生院和村卫生室面临行政人员过多的问题,主要涉及药剂师、其他非医疗技术人员和卫生管理人员,这对医疗支出的效率产生了不利影响。本研究表明,在thc和vc中,非村医职位(如药剂师、卫生管理人员和非医疗技术人员)的比例越高,中国PHC系统的效率越低。总的来说,当务之急应该是加强对乡村医生和其他农村卫生工作者的培训和薪酬,以进一步提高他们的绩效,提高中国卫生保健系统的整体效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
Impact of pilot public hospital reform on efficiencies: a DEA analysis of county hospitals in East China, 2009-2015. What can we learn about the impact of cancelled planned operations on waiting times? A case study using the 2017/18 winter flu postponement policy in England. Catastrophic and impoverishing out-of-pocket health expenditure in Ethiopia: evidence from the Ethiopia socioeconomic survey. Modelling epidemiological and economics processes - the case of cervical cancer. The heterogeneous association between education and the adoption of safe food handling practices in Ethiopia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1