An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China.

IF 2.7 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Health Economics Review Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5
Jingjing Cheng, Xianming Kuang, Ping Zhou, Weiran Sha
{"title":"An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China.","authors":"Jingjing Cheng, Xianming Kuang, Ping Zhou, Weiran Sha","doi":"10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>China's primary healthcare (PHC) system, together with rural healthcare services, remains the Achilles' heel in the national healthcare system. Healthcare workers, specifically village doctors, are an integral part of the healthcare system. Using the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression analysis, this study aims to investigate the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on medical resources and services in China, as well as determine how different types of healthcare work influence efficiency. Compared with other types of healthcare workers, village doctors exerted a prominent impact on provincial and rural efficiency at all stages and played a key role in augmenting the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on health outcomes. Besides, township health centers (THCs) and village clinics (VCs) faced administrative overstaffing, mainly involving pharmacists, other nonmedical technologists, and health administrators, which adversely affected the efficiency of healthcare expenditures. This study suggests that the higher the proportion of these non-village doctor positions (e.g., pharmacists, health administrators, and nonmedical technologists) in THCs and VCs, the lower the efficiency of China's PHC system. Overall, the priority should be enhancing the training and remuneration of village doctors and other healthcare workers in rural areas to further enhance their performance and increase the overall efficiency of China's healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":46936,"journal":{"name":"Health Economics Review","volume":"14 1","pages":"105"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Economics Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-024-00585-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

China's primary healthcare (PHC) system, together with rural healthcare services, remains the Achilles' heel in the national healthcare system. Healthcare workers, specifically village doctors, are an integral part of the healthcare system. Using the two-stage data envelopment analysis (DEA) and Tobit regression analysis, this study aims to investigate the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on medical resources and services in China, as well as determine how different types of healthcare work influence efficiency. Compared with other types of healthcare workers, village doctors exerted a prominent impact on provincial and rural efficiency at all stages and played a key role in augmenting the efficiency of healthcare expenditures on health outcomes. Besides, township health centers (THCs) and village clinics (VCs) faced administrative overstaffing, mainly involving pharmacists, other nonmedical technologists, and health administrators, which adversely affected the efficiency of healthcare expenditures. This study suggests that the higher the proportion of these non-village doctor positions (e.g., pharmacists, health administrators, and nonmedical technologists) in THCs and VCs, the lower the efficiency of China's PHC system. Overall, the priority should be enhancing the training and remuneration of village doctors and other healthcare workers in rural areas to further enhance their performance and increase the overall efficiency of China's healthcare system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
4.20%
发文量
59
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Economics Review is an international high-quality journal covering all fields of Health Economics. A broad range of theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy with a health economic focus will be considered for publication. Its scope includes macro- and microeconomics of health care financing, health insurance and reimbursement as well as health economic evaluation, health services research and health policy analysis. Further research topics are the individual and institutional aspects of health care management and the growing importance of health care in developing countries.
期刊最新文献
A scoping review of COVID-19 economic response policies in the MENA countries: lessons learned for Iran for future pandemics. Determinants of the economic burden of ART on the Italian NHS: insights from the Lombardy region. An analysis of factors influencing technical efficiency of health expenditures in China. Contracting with sequential care providers. Effect of health shocks on the absenteeism magnitude at work in Togo: is health insurance a mitigating factor?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1