Dexterity assessment of hospital workers: prospective comparative study

The BMJ Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1136/bmj-2024-081814
Tobin Joseph, Oliver I Brown, Sara Khalid, Marilena Giannoudi, Rebecca C Sagar, Elena Bunola-Hadfield, Stephen J Chapman, Thomas A Slater, Sam Straw, Michael Drozd
{"title":"Dexterity assessment of hospital workers: prospective comparative study","authors":"Tobin Joseph, Oliver I Brown, Sara Khalid, Marilena Giannoudi, Rebecca C Sagar, Elena Bunola-Hadfield, Stephen J Chapman, Thomas A Slater, Sam Straw, Michael Drozd","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-081814","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives To compare the manual dexterity and composure under pressure of people in different hospital staff roles using a buzz wire game. Design Prospective, observational, comparative study (Tremor study). Setting Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK, during a three week period in 2024. Participants 254 hospital staff members comprising of 60 physicians, 64 surgeons, 69 nurses, and 61 non-clinical staff. Main outcome measures Successful completion of the buzz wire game within five minutes and occurrence of swearing and audible noises of frustration. Results Of the 254 hospital staff that participated, surgeons had significantly higher success rates in completing the buzz wire game within five minutes (84%, n=54) compared with physicians (57%, n=34), nurses (54%, n=37), and non-clinical staff (51%, n=31) (P<0.001). Time-to-event analysis showed that surgeons were quicker to successfully complete the game, independent of age and gender. Surgeons exhibited the highest rate of swearing during the game (50%, n=32), followed by nurses (30%, n=21), physicians (25%, n=60), and non-clinical staff (23%, n=14) (P=0.004). Non-clinical staff showed the highest use of frustration noises (75%), followed by nurses (68%), surgeons (58%), and physicians (52%) (P=0.03). Conclusions Surgeons showed greater dexterity, but higher levels of swearing compared with other hospital staff roles, while nurses and non-clinical staff showed the highest rates of audible noises of frustration. The study highlights the diverse skill sets across hospital staff roles. Implementation of a surgical swear jar initiative should be considered for future fundraising events. The study data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":22388,"journal":{"name":"The BMJ","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The BMJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2024-081814","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives To compare the manual dexterity and composure under pressure of people in different hospital staff roles using a buzz wire game. Design Prospective, observational, comparative study (Tremor study). Setting Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK, during a three week period in 2024. Participants 254 hospital staff members comprising of 60 physicians, 64 surgeons, 69 nurses, and 61 non-clinical staff. Main outcome measures Successful completion of the buzz wire game within five minutes and occurrence of swearing and audible noises of frustration. Results Of the 254 hospital staff that participated, surgeons had significantly higher success rates in completing the buzz wire game within five minutes (84%, n=54) compared with physicians (57%, n=34), nurses (54%, n=37), and non-clinical staff (51%, n=31) (P<0.001). Time-to-event analysis showed that surgeons were quicker to successfully complete the game, independent of age and gender. Surgeons exhibited the highest rate of swearing during the game (50%, n=32), followed by nurses (30%, n=21), physicians (25%, n=60), and non-clinical staff (23%, n=14) (P=0.004). Non-clinical staff showed the highest use of frustration noises (75%), followed by nurses (68%), surgeons (58%), and physicians (52%) (P=0.03). Conclusions Surgeons showed greater dexterity, but higher levels of swearing compared with other hospital staff roles, while nurses and non-clinical staff showed the highest rates of audible noises of frustration. The study highlights the diverse skill sets across hospital staff roles. Implementation of a surgical swear jar initiative should be considered for future fundraising events. The study data are available on reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医院工作人员灵活性评估:前瞻性比较研究
目的通过buzz wire游戏比较不同医院工作人员角色在压力下的手灵活性和镇静能力。前瞻性、观察性、比较研究(震颤研究)。设置利兹教学医院NHS信托,利兹,英国,在2024年的三周期间。参与者是254名医院工作人员,包括60名医生、64名外科医生、69名护士和61名非临床工作人员。主要结果测量:在5分钟内完成buzz wire游戏,出现骂人和沮丧的声音。结果在254名医院工作人员中,外科医生在5分钟内完成buzz wire游戏的成功率(84%,n=54)明显高于内科医生(57%,n=34)、护士(54%,n=37)和非临床工作人员(51%,n=31) (P<0.001)。时间对事件的分析表明,外科医生能够更快地完成游戏,与年龄和性别无关。外科医生在比赛中骂人的比例最高(50%,n=32),其次是护士(30%,n=21),内科医生(25%,n=60)和非临床工作人员(23%,n=14) (P=0.004)。非临床工作人员使用挫折噪声最多(75%),其次是护士(68%)、外科医生(58%)和内科医生(52%)(P=0.03)。结论:与其他医院工作人员相比,外科医生表现出更大的灵活性,但咒骂的水平更高,而护士和非临床工作人员表现出最高的沮丧声音率。该研究强调了医院工作人员角色的不同技能组合。在未来的募款活动中,应考虑实施手术誓言罐倡议。如有合理要求,可提供研究数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Regulating invasive cosmetic procedures to reduce harm. TB surge: Is England about to lose its low incidence status? Chronic heart failure in adults: diagnosis and management-summary of updated NICE guidance. EPA throws out science in favour of anti-regulatory ideology. Prenatal antiseizure drug exposure and risk of neurodevelopmental disorders in children: population based cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1