Assessing the accuracy of various statistical models for forecasting PM\(_{2.5}\): a case study from diverse regions of Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s10661-024-13550-w
Sajeed I. Ghanchi, Dishant M. Pandya, Manan Shah
{"title":"Assessing the accuracy of various statistical models for forecasting PM\\(_{2.5}\\): a case study from diverse regions of Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad","authors":"Sajeed I. Ghanchi,&nbsp;Dishant M. Pandya,&nbsp;Manan Shah","doi":"10.1007/s10661-024-13550-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>PM<span>\\(_{2.5}\\)</span> is the most hazardous air pollutant due to its smaller size, which allows deeper bodily penetration. Three diverse regions from Gujarat, India, namely Sector 10, Maninagar, and Vatva, which have green space, high population concentration, and industries, respectively, were chosen to forecast PM<span>\\(_{2.5}\\)</span> concentration for the next day. Four statistical models, including Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES), and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), were chosen to forecast PM<span>\\(_{2.5}\\)</span> levels. For this study, data of various pollutants and meteorological parameters were collected from February 2019 to September 2023. Analysis of the seasonal patterns of PM<span>\\(_{2.5}\\)</span> revealed elevated concentrations during post-monsoon and winter, in contrast to reduced levels during summer and monsoon. Statistical analysis revealed that the concentration of PM<span>\\(_{2.5}\\)</span> in Sector 10 is much lower than in the other two regions. The analysis of the test results, utilising various accuracy measures like RMSE, MAE, MAPE, IA, and others, indicated that Sector 10 achieved the highest precision in its results. While assessing the models’ accuracy on the test data, the ARIMA model demonstrated the highest level of precision. The average RMSE, MAE, and MAPE values for the ARIMA model were 12.63, 8.59, and 0.24, respectively. In the comparison of the performance between these statistical models and the neural network-based Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model, it was observed that the statistical model demonstrated superior performance over the MLP model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":544,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","volume":"197 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Monitoring and Assessment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10661-024-13550-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PM\(_{2.5}\) is the most hazardous air pollutant due to its smaller size, which allows deeper bodily penetration. Three diverse regions from Gujarat, India, namely Sector 10, Maninagar, and Vatva, which have green space, high population concentration, and industries, respectively, were chosen to forecast PM\(_{2.5}\) concentration for the next day. Four statistical models, including Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), Principal Component Regression (PCR), Simple Exponential Smoothing (SES), and Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), were chosen to forecast PM\(_{2.5}\) levels. For this study, data of various pollutants and meteorological parameters were collected from February 2019 to September 2023. Analysis of the seasonal patterns of PM\(_{2.5}\) revealed elevated concentrations during post-monsoon and winter, in contrast to reduced levels during summer and monsoon. Statistical analysis revealed that the concentration of PM\(_{2.5}\) in Sector 10 is much lower than in the other two regions. The analysis of the test results, utilising various accuracy measures like RMSE, MAE, MAPE, IA, and others, indicated that Sector 10 achieved the highest precision in its results. While assessing the models’ accuracy on the test data, the ARIMA model demonstrated the highest level of precision. The average RMSE, MAE, and MAPE values for the ARIMA model were 12.63, 8.59, and 0.24, respectively. In the comparison of the performance between these statistical models and the neural network-based Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) model, it was observed that the statistical model demonstrated superior performance over the MLP model.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1000
审稿时长
7.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment emphasizes technical developments and data arising from environmental monitoring and assessment, the use of scientific principles in the design of monitoring systems at the local, regional and global scales, and the use of monitoring data in assessing the consequences of natural resource management actions and pollution risks to man and the environment.
期刊最新文献
Study on the synergistic mechanism of proline in the treatment of high-salt phenolic wastewater by short-time aerobic digestion process Determination of noise levels and effects in noise sensitive areas case study: Sakarya province Serdivan district of Turkey Assessing the accuracy of various statistical models for forecasting PM\(_{2.5}\): a case study from diverse regions of Gandhinagar and Ahmedabad Identification and quantification of localized urban heat island intensity and footprint for Chennai Metropolitan Area during 1988–2023 The older, the better: a comprehensive survey of soil organic carbon under commercial oil palm plantations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1